Brigid Schulte, the author of this article, posted a message here last week asking if anyone else had had their child kicked out of preschool as a result of accidents. The reaction from DCUM users was to question whether the child had, in fact, been potty-trained. This apparently upset the mother and Brigid asked me to remove the message thread. But, seeing the comments on the Post website, I think DCUM was largely restrained in comparison. If the DCUM comments gave the mother pause about the wisdom of the article, she probably should have followed her instincts.
I initially posted this question in another thread, but have not received a response.
Jeff - I take it you complied with that request - can I ask why? I don't believe any names were mentioned in the first thread, and the discussion, while not supportive of the mother, was not really that bad (what I saw of it, anyway). If an anonymous person being upset that she received criticism in a thread is grounds for removing that thread, aren't all threads subject to removal? It seems especially odd because the mother (and you) knew that an article would appear in the Post - it's not like removing the thread would put an end to the issue. Not trying to be confrontational, but I'm curious about your thought process.
|