As I recall, the official plan was for Gerri to be CEO, but that was always assumed to be subject to a Logan making up his mind about which of his children might be able to fill the role. There would be no show if there was a well established plan, but I do think you’re partially right about the cost of hubris being the point of the show, along with the idea that Logan was successful *because* he was a brilliant malignant narcissist, and none of his children can fill his shoes (even though they all share his narcissism to varying degrees). |
There is no Collin. It’s Connor. |
It’s Connor. |
People, Connor = big brother who ran for President. Collin = Logan’s security guy. There are two people. |
Do you even watch the show? Colin was Logan’s body guy. Kendall pitched him to come work for him now that Logan is dead, hence the PPs reference to scooping up Collin. |
Re: the Living+ speech, you're forgetting how well his speech went after the cringey first moments you described. It was very well delivered - and well received, as we see from the audience's reaction and the backslapping he gets backstage. In addition, he adroitly and diplomatically addressed the audience member's awkward question about Mattson's inappropriate tweet. DP |
![]() So true. DP |
No, we're talking about Collin, Logan's personal driver and "friend." |
The actor who plays Tom was asked how people were going to feel about the ending -- satisfied or surprised, and he said both but that of course Armstrong wasn't going to do what people expected. So I have a bad feeling Greg winds up on top. |
Lukas Mattson (or somebody just like him) will end up in charge of all of it. That is where my money is.
It makes sense. This show is about a dying breed. You have some 60+ old white guys still in charge. But they aren't getting replaced by other old white guys and family members. They are getting replaced my young tech people with tons of new money. This show has been true to current times and they'll end on that note. |
Agree to disagree. I found the Living+ speech cringey and embarrassing, even if it winds up getting a good reception, whereas the eulogy was both beautifully written and smart in terms of positioning Kendall as a clear successor to his dad’s eulogy. |
It’s not unheard of. The show us at least partially based on Rupert Murdoch and his kids, who have definitely engaged in similar jockeying for control of Murdoch’s business (which is very similar to Waystar, of course). I also know the family that owns the Denver Broncos has similar drama, including with kids from multiple marriages competing to take over and one kid with substance abuse issues who I think got a DUI that impacted his chances of taking over? Can’t remember the details but it was similarly soap opera-y. Waystar is unique because while it’s publicly traded, it’s still a family company with the family owning controlling shares. So not as closely held as, say, Trump’s businesses (which are not public) but different from company’s where the founder died generations ago and ownership now lies with people unrelated to them, where decisions about executive management don’t involve family drama. |
This show is boring and reductive. There was so much hype I started watching it. I've only watched two seasons but it seems like the plot every episode is the same. BORING. |
You’re correct. It IS boring. Very little happens. If you were to remove the wealth from the plot, it would be unwatchable. This show appeals to vapid people who are easily impressed by money and visual effects. The plot isn’t interesting and the characters lack any depth. There are some funny remarks by the characters at times, but that is it. I wish I’d stopped when I did. Season one when an entire episode is about a helicopter ride is silly. Oh wow a helicopter!!! These people are so loaded….check out that helicopter!! Look at this rich family play baseball! How entertaining! BORING. |
np. actually, it was softball. and the unbelievable cruelty of some of the family members was on display. |