Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was


Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...


hey, I said I'm waiting with bated breath to hear the credible reasons for the raid. If it's there, I'll be 100% on the FBI's side. Surprising to me though that Trump is the one advocating most loudly for release of the warrant.



Garland prefers not to say, but probably what happened is that there was a recent realization, perhaps due to a tip-off, that ultra-sensitive nuclear docs were held at Mar-a-lago. That set off an urgent process to recover them before any more harm could be done - harm, meaning our most secret nuclear tech info (US or foreign) used by enemies or potential enemies of the state. You understand that the first entity Trump shares or sells it to can then turn around and sell it to someone else. Once it's out, it's out. Even though Trump had this since he left the WH, the DOJ cannot say "oh it's been so long, what's another few months!". No, as soon as they know, it's the topmost national security priority to recover the docs. They have no choice.

You've got to accept that the LAST thing DOJ wants to do is piss off the MAGA set and set off a political firestorm before the mid terms. DOJ HAD NO CHOICE WHEN THEY REALIZED THE DANGER.

This isn't a little game of owning the right, or owning the left. It's gone beyond the political domestic sphere. We are now at DEFCON 1 in terms of global threat, if all this is indeed true and very sensitive nuclear information has fallen into the wrong hands.

I want to point out here that the public may perhaps never have the full picture, given the sensitive nature of the information. Perhaps a foreign country already has the info, but the American public will never know. Our current and future presidents will have to deal with the fallout of the cursed Trump presidency and post-presidency. Trump himself, if this is really what happened, must be neutralized at all costs. He is a clear and present danger to the USA, our allies (whose nuclear info may have been stolen), and indeed the whole world order.

Again, the public is not the best judge of all of this for now. It's difficult to trust our institutions given the political climate, but I am convinced they are working to defend us.


Anonymous


The Federal Bureau of Investigation agents took around 20 boxes of items, binders of photos, a handwritten note and the executive grant of clemency for Mr. Trump’s ally Roger Stone, a list of items removed from the property shows. Also included in the list was information about the “President of France,” according to the three-page list. The list is contained in a seven-page document that also includes the warrant to search the premises which was granted by a federal magistrate judge in Florida.

The list includes references to one set of documents marked as “Various classified/TS/SCI documents,” an abbreviation that refers to top-secret/sensitive compartmented information. It also says agents collected four sets of top secret documents, three sets of secret documents, and three sets of confidential documents. The list didn’t provide any more details about the substance of the documents.
Anonymous
FBI Recovered Eleven Sets of Classified Documents in Trump Search, Inventory Shows

“FBI agents who searched former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home Monday removed 11 sets of classified documents, including some marked as top secret and meant to be only available in special government facilities, according to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation agents took around 20 boxes of items, binders of photos, a handwritten note and the executive grant of clemency for Mr. Trump’s ally Roger Stone, a list of items removed from the property shows. Also included in the list was information about the President of France.”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fbi-recovered-eleven-sets-of-classified-documents-in-trump-search-inventory-shows-11660324501

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was


Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...


hey, I said I'm waiting with bated breath to hear the credible reasons for the raid. If it's there, I'll be 100% on the FBI's side. Surprising to me though that Trump is the one advocating most loudly for release of the warrant.



Come on - you’re still giving trump the benefit of the doubt? After he yanked your chain so long over his taxes? He’s not going to agree to release the warrant, even if he says the opposite on social media. Stop being so gullible/partisan.


you too.


DP here, you can't just "nuh-uh" your way out of this one. Trump could release the warrant today. He hasn't. It is not gullible or partisan to conclude that he does not plan to do so willingly, and it is not gullible or partisan to conclude - upon a thorough consideration of his past actions - that he is lying.


ok. Perhaps I'm ill-informed but I thought I read that Trump wants the search warrant documents unsealed, and a judge gave the DOJ After a federal judge gave the DOJ a deadline to determine whether Trump wants them to do that? Weird because Trump has said he clearly wants the documents unsealed. I'm just waiting along with everybody else to hear what the reasons were.


What part of TRUMP CAN POST A JPEG OF THE WARRANT ANY TIME HE WANTS TO?!!

He has it and refuses to produce a copy even while saying that he wants it released. He is full of shit and here you are falling for it.[/quote

fine. I'm falling for it. At the risk of angering you further, aren't there underlying documents that need to support the warrant itself?


You're talking about the affidavit (as you well know).

It has to stay confidential, because it lays out who tipped off DOJ/FBI, and they need to protect their sources.

Your next question is "why do they need to protect the sources?"

Why don't you exercise your two remaining neurons and piece together an answer

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was


Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...


hey, I said I'm waiting with bated breath to hear the credible reasons for the raid. If it's there, I'll be 100% on the FBI's side. Surprising to me though that Trump is the one advocating most loudly for release of the warrant.



Come on - you’re still giving trump the benefit of the doubt? After he yanked your chain so long over his taxes? He’s not going to agree to release the warrant, even if he says the opposite on social media. Stop being so gullible/partisan.


you too.


DP here, you can't just "nuh-uh" your way out of this one. Trump could release the warrant today. He hasn't. It is not gullible or partisan to conclude that he does not plan to do so willingly, and it is not gullible or partisan to conclude - upon a thorough consideration of his past actions - that he is lying.


ok. Perhaps I'm ill-informed but I thought I read that Trump wants the search warrant documents unsealed, and a judge gave the DOJ After a federal judge gave the DOJ a deadline to determine whether Trump wants them to do that? Weird because Trump has said he clearly wants the documents unsealed. I'm just waiting along with everybody else to hear what the reasons were.


What part of TRUMP CAN POST A JPEG OF THE WARRANT ANY TIME HE WANTS TO?!!

He has it and refuses to produce a copy even while saying that he wants it released. He is full of shit and here you are falling for it.


fine. I'm falling for it. At the risk of angering you further, aren't there underlying documents that need to support the warrant itself?

Why aren’t you interested in seeing the warrant anymore now that you know Trump could show it to you?
Anonymous
Anything Trump does is legal - Republicans
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:New Trump statement - under the "Trump projection" rubric this totally means that there were classified nuclear documents at MAL, right?



Is this libel?


So Trump knew Obama stole 30,000 classified documents, including nuclear secrets, and then did nothing about for his entire term? That does seem bad.


So, put them both in jail and call it a day. Next!


Nope, the law is clear you can’t prosecute a two-term president. One termers are fair game though. Sorry!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was


Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...


hey, I said I'm waiting with bated breath to hear the credible reasons for the raid. If it's there, I'll be 100% on the FBI's side. Surprising to me though that Trump is the one advocating most loudly for release of the warrant.



We won’t get the affidavit of probable cause and therefore won’t get to know all the reasons for applying for the warrant, which remains sealed until an indictment is issued. What we will learn is a general description of the materials to be siezed and the areas where the search is to be conducted. We also will learn the legal authority under which the search is being conducted, such as 18 USC sec. 793 (Espionage Act). If the court releases the inventory then subject to classification restrictions we will learn about the materials siezed and removed. I will be looking for any indication of documents classified as Special Access Program or Sensitve Compartmented Information.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was


Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...


hey, I said I'm waiting with bated breath to hear the credible reasons for the raid. If it's there, I'll be 100% on the FBI's side. Surprising to me though that Trump is the one advocating most loudly for release of the warrant.



Garland prefers not to say, but probably what happened is that there was a recent realization, perhaps due to a tip-off, that ultra-sensitive nuclear docs were held at Mar-a-lago. That set off an urgent process to recover them before any more harm could be done - harm, meaning our most secret nuclear tech info (US or foreign) used by enemies or potential enemies of the state. You understand that the first entity Trump shares or sells it to can then turn around and sell it to someone else. Once it's out, it's out. Even though Trump had this since he left the WH, the DOJ cannot say "oh it's been so long, what's another few months!". No, as soon as they know, it's the topmost national security priority to recover the docs. They have no choice.

You've got to accept that the LAST thing DOJ wants to do is piss off the MAGA set and set off a political firestorm before the mid terms. DOJ HAD NO CHOICE WHEN THEY REALIZED THE DANGER.

This isn't a little game of owning the right, or owning the left. It's gone beyond the political domestic sphere. We are now at DEFCON 1 in terms of global threat, if all this is indeed true and very sensitive nuclear information has fallen into the wrong hands.

I want to point out here that the public may perhaps never have the full picture, given the sensitive nature of the information. Perhaps a foreign country already has the info, but the American public will never know. Our current and future presidents will have to deal with the fallout of the cursed Trump presidency and post-presidency. Trump himself, if this is really what happened, must be neutralized at all costs. He is a clear and present danger to the USA, our allies (whose nuclear info may have been stolen), and indeed the whole world order.

Again, the public is not the best judge of all of this for now. It's difficult to trust our institutions given the political climate, but I am convinced they are working to defend us.




But let’s not forget, this is why he was elected in 2016. People were tired of the “Washington elite” talking down to them. They wanted to send someone in to burn it all down. Remember bannon et al who wanted to destroy the administrative state. Well. This is part of that destruction.

Trump probably figured he could get a lot of money for this info. Unclear how he thought he could get away with it though. He’s an increasingly desperate man.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:New Trump statement - under the "Trump projection" rubric this totally means that there were classified nuclear documents at MAL, right?



Is this libel?


So Trump knew Obama stole 30,000 classified documents, including nuclear secrets, and then did nothing about for his entire term? That does seem bad.


So, put them both in jail and call it a day. Next!


Nope, the law is clear you can’t prosecute a two-term president. One termers are fair game though. Sorry!


But I was told Trump is still lawfully president and will return to the White House when Jesus removes Biden in October. How will that work?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was


Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...


hey, I said I'm waiting with bated breath to hear the credible reasons for the raid. If it's there, I'll be 100% on the FBI's side. Surprising to me though that Trump is the one advocating most loudly for release of the warrant.



Come on - you’re still giving trump the benefit of the doubt? After he yanked your chain so long over his taxes? He’s not going to agree to release the warrant, even if he says the opposite on social media. Stop being so gullible/partisan.


you too.


DP here, you can't just "nuh-uh" your way out of this one. Trump could release the warrant today. He hasn't. It is not gullible or partisan to conclude that he does not plan to do so willingly, and it is not gullible or partisan to conclude - upon a thorough consideration of his past actions - that he is lying.


ok. Perhaps I'm ill-informed but I thought I read that Trump wants the search warrant documents unsealed, and a judge gave the DOJ After a federal judge gave the DOJ a deadline to determine whether Trump wants them to do that? Weird because Trump has said he clearly wants the documents unsealed. I'm just waiting along with everybody else to hear what the reasons were.


What part of TRUMP CAN POST A JPEG OF THE WARRANT ANY TIME HE WANTS TO?!!

He has it and refuses to produce a copy even while saying that he wants it released. He is full of shit and here you are falling for it.[/quote

fine. I'm falling for it. At the risk of angering you further, aren't there underlying documents that need to support the warrant itself?


You're talking about the affidavit (as you well know).

It has to stay confidential, because it lays out who tipped off DOJ/FBI, and they need to protect their sources.

Your next question is "why do they need to protect the sources?"

Why don't you exercise your two remaining neurons and piece together an answer



The affidavit typically will refer to confidential sources as “CI-1” etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:New Trump statement - under the "Trump projection" rubric this totally means that there were classified nuclear documents at MAL, right?



Is this libel?


No. Let’s just put both Trump and Obama in a cell together and call it a day.


Why?


2 for 1 discount if they both took home nuclear secrets.


This really is libel, and if some armed vigilante shows up at Obama's house likat guy did at Comet Ping Pong, it could get dangerous.


It may be dumb, but it’s certainly not libel.


Why not? It's a published statement. It's false. It's damaging to Obama's reputation. It sounds like libel to me.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was


Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...


hey, I said I'm waiting with bated breath to hear the credible reasons for the raid. If it's there, I'll be 100% on the FBI's side. Surprising to me though that Trump is the one advocating most loudly for release of the warrant.



Come on - you’re still giving trump the benefit of the doubt? After he yanked your chain so long over his taxes? He’s not going to agree to release the warrant, even if he says the opposite on social media. Stop being so gullible/partisan.


you too.


DP here, you can't just "nuh-uh" your way out of this one. Trump could release the warrant today. He hasn't. It is not gullible or partisan to conclude that he does not plan to do so willingly, and it is not gullible or partisan to conclude - upon a thorough consideration of his past actions - that he is lying.


ok. Perhaps I'm ill-informed but I thought I read that Trump wants the search warrant documents unsealed, and a judge gave the DOJ After a federal judge gave the DOJ a deadline to determine whether Trump wants them to do that? Weird because Trump has said he clearly wants the documents unsealed. I'm just waiting along with everybody else to hear what the reasons were.


What part of TRUMP CAN POST A JPEG OF THE WARRANT ANY TIME HE WANTS TO?!!

He has it and refuses to produce a copy even while saying that he wants it released. He is full of shit and here you are falling for it.[/quote

fine. I'm falling for it. At the risk of angering you further, aren't there underlying documents that need to support the warrant itself?


You're talking about the affidavit (as you well know).

It has to stay confidential, because it lays out who tipped off DOJ/FBI, and they need to protect their sources.

Your next question is "why do they need to protect the sources?"

Why don't you exercise your two remaining neurons and piece together an answer



The affidavit typically will refer to confidential sources as “CI-1” etc.


“WITNESS 1” is another.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:New Trump statement - under the "Trump projection" rubric this totally means that there were classified nuclear documents at MAL, right?



Is this libel?


So Trump knew Obama stole 30,000 classified documents, including nuclear secrets, and then did nothing about for his entire term? That does seem bad.


So, put them both in jail and call it a day. Next!


Nope, the law is clear you can’t prosecute a two-term president. One termers are fair game though. Sorry!


But I was told Trump is still lawfully president and will return to the White House when Jesus removes Biden in October. How will that work?


You're all confused. Q told us JFK Jr would come back, oust Biden and enthrone Trump as permanent Prez (PP for short).
He's a little late, but we believe this is what'll happen. In the meantime, Trump is our martyr fighting to MAGA, and he can do no wrong. He wanted to launch nuclear weapons at pizza basements where pedophile communists are meeting in secret, plotting to brainwash our kids.

Or something like that.

Anonymous
Initial reports of inventory indicated 11 sets of classified documents were siezed, with several classified as SCI, one of the highest levels. Holy smokes.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: