Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Wow. Just read up on this. Wasn’t really a fan of either but this is a REALLY bad look for Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds. Like holy hell, she was sexting this guy and he basically rejected her.

And she also wants control of these films so she claimed he harassed her and tried to metoo him. When the guy seems to just be a random guy who likes acting and loves his wife and family.

What a disgusting tool Blake Lively is. Usually I side with the women in these situations, but cmon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow. Just read up on this. Wasn’t really a fan of either but this is a REALLY bad look for Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds. Like holy hell, she was sexting this guy and he basically rejected her.

And she also wants control of these films so she claimed he harassed her and tried to metoo him. When the guy seems to just be a random guy who likes acting and loves his wife and family.

What a disgusting tool Blake Lively is. Usually I side with the women in these situations, but cmon.

What was the sexting part? I think I missed that!

[Anonymous]

There was no sexting. Carry on…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow. Just read up on this. Wasn’t really a fan of either but this is a REALLY bad look for Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds. Like holy hell, she was sexting this guy and he basically rejected her.

And she also wants control of these films so she claimed he harassed her and tried to metoo him. When the guy seems to just be a random guy who likes acting and loves his wife and family.

What a disgusting tool Blake Lively is. Usually I side with the women in these situations, but cmon.

What was the sexting part? I think I missed that!

[Anonymous]

Also

[Anonymous]

Her language is very much word salad. WTH is she talking about? It sounds like she is describing a full bodied wine or something. That text from her is gross.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her language is very much word salad. WTH is she talking about? It sounds like she is describing a full bodied wine or something. That text from her is gross.

I would NEVER send a coworker a text about my love language and the “without teeth” comment is just gross.

It seems like she put herself out there to Justin and he wasn’t feeling her and kept it professional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her language is very much word salad. WTH is she talking about? It sounds like she is describing a full bodied wine or something. That text from her is gross.

I would NEVER send a coworker a text about my love language and the “without teeth” comment is just gross.

It seems like she put herself out there to Justin and he wasn’t feeling her and kept it professional.

Yes, based on this text, she was SH Justin. She didn’t realize they were supposed to be acting. He was playing a role and so was she supposedly. She’s delusional. It’s sad but maybe she had some postpartum psychosis going on.

[Anonymous]

I want to talk about the retaliation claim. I still think Blake's PR mistakes were largely self-inflicted. But reading Blake's complaint, there are some texts confirming Jed Wallace did do work, and if you read Justin's lawsuit, the only thing I get out of that is that they didn't use bots -- which still doesn't mean they couldn't have planted stories.

For example, in a text from Jennifer Abel, according to Blake Lively’s complaint, she says this: “We've also started to see a shift on social, due largely to Jed and his team's
efforts to shift the narrative towards shining a spotlight on Blake and Ryan.”

What do lawyers have to say to that? Is that problematic for you, or does it still fail to pass muster given that it seems Justin was doing this to protect his reputation and it wasn't in retaliation to the SH claims?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, it sounds like Jed Wallace is one of the defendant(s) who's going to be added to Lively's lawsuit:

https://deadline.com/2025/02/blake-lively-trial-strategy-justin-baldoni-1236278393/

So BL allegation is that Wallace/his company was hired by JB and others she is suing to do the social media takedown? Yes I read article linked, but honestly got confused by how written since don’t know all the names to know who is on which side.

Yes. Wallace is known for his unmoral pr tactics.

It's really unclear to me what's immoral and particularly, illegal here. It seems sort of sleezy and dirty to use bots but...is that sanctionable? At the end of the day, even that effort would not have been successful if they didn't have the underlying footage of Lively being absolutely heinous on multiple occasions. To me, whatever they did to boost those views is sort of secondary to the fact that the worst offense is those tapes were available in the first place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, it sounds like Jed Wallace is one of the defendant(s) who's going to be added to Lively's lawsuit:

https://deadline.com/2025/02/blake-lively-trial-strategy-justin-baldoni-1236278393/

So BL allegation is that Wallace/his company was hired by JB and others she is suing to do the social media takedown? Yes I read article linked, but honestly got confused by how written since don’t know all the names to know who is on which side.

Yes. Wallace is known for his unmoral pr tactics.

It's really unclear to me what's immoral and particularly, illegal here. It seems sort of sleezy and dirty to use bots but...is that sanctionable? At the end of the day, even that effort would not have been successful if they didn't have the underlying footage of Lively being absolutely heinous on multiple occasions. To me, whatever they did to boost those views is sort of secondary to the fact that the worst offense is those tapes were available in the first place.

Not to detract from your underlying point, but I think Jed's team may have planted stories, not used bots. TAG denies the use of bots, but I don't see anything Justin's complaint denying the planting of negative stories by real humans. denial of bots, pg. 148: https://thelawsuitinfo.com/downloads/amended-complaint.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, it sounds like Jed Wallace is one of the defendant(s) who's going to be added to Lively's lawsuit:

https://deadline.com/2025/02/blake-lively-trial-strategy-justin-baldoni-1236278393/

So BL allegation is that Wallace/his company was hired by JB and others she is suing to do the social media takedown? Yes I read article linked, but honestly got confused by how written since don’t know all the names to know who is on which side.

Yes. Wallace is known for his unmoral pr tactics.

It's really unclear to me what's immoral and particularly, illegal here. It seems sort of sleezy and dirty to use bots but...is that sanctionable? At the end of the day, even that effort would not have been successful if they didn't have the underlying footage of Lively being absolutely heinous on multiple occasions. To me, whatever they did to boost those views is sort of secondary to the fact that the worst offense is those tapes were available in the first place.

Not to detract from your underlying point, but I think Jed's team may have planted stories, not used bots. TAG denies the use of bots, but I don't see anything Justin's complaint denying the planting of negative stories by real humans. denial of bots, pg. 148: https://thelawsuitinfo.com/downloads/amended-complaint.pdf

Planting stories, unless false, seems even less actionable to me! Maybe it's because I think celebrity PR is sort of inherently bereft of dignity, but something like re-introducing old (but verified) interviews seems...fine? Sure, it's a powerplay. But again, you couldn't do this without the underlying footage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, it sounds like Jed Wallace is one of the defendant(s) who's going to be added to Lively's lawsuit:

https://deadline.com/2025/02/blake-lively-trial-strategy-justin-baldoni-1236278393/

So BL allegation is that Wallace/his company was hired by JB and others she is suing to do the social media takedown? Yes I read article linked, but honestly got confused by how written since don’t know all the names to know who is on which side.

Yes. Wallace is known for his unmoral pr tactics.

It's really unclear to me what's immoral and particularly, illegal here. It seems sort of sleezy and dirty to use bots but...is that sanctionable? At the end of the day, even that effort would not have been successful if they didn't have the underlying footage of Lively being absolutely heinous on multiple occasions. To me, whatever they did to boost those views is sort of secondary to the fact that the worst offense is those tapes were available in the first place.

Not to detract from your underlying point, but I think Jed's team may have planted stories, not used bots. TAG denies the use of bots, but I don't see anything Justin's complaint denying the planting of negative stories by real humans. denial of bots, pg. 148: https://thelawsuitinfo.com/downloads/amended-complaint.pdf

Planting stories, unless false, seems even less actionable to me! Maybe it's because I think celebrity PR is sort of inherently bereft of dignity, but something like re-introducing old (but verified) interviews seems...fine? Sure, it's a powerplay. But again, you couldn't do this without the underlying footage.

I’m with u, seems less dirty in a way, but we don’t know what Jed posted. He very well could’ve posted some false nasty stuff about them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Her language is very much word salad. WTH is she talking about? It sounds like she is describing a full bodied wine or something. That text from her is gross.

I’m team Baldoni but in that text message she is trying to convey how she will act the scene, not flirt with him. I do find it weird how she proposes to basically … play herself instead of the character but 🤷 It also gives some insight into the creative differences since I am not sure that the interaction she imagines makes any sense at all with an abusive man. If anything that kind of “ball busting” in jest would result in abusive man getting very angry - in fact it would sort of be a classic red flag where he gets mad at being insulted and “teaches” her that by getting angry. She seems to be seeing the movie as a rom com which is very weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I want to talk about the retaliation claim. I still think Blake's PR mistakes were largely self-inflicted. But reading Blake's complaint, there are some texts confirming Jed Wallace did do work, and if you read Justin's lawsuit, the only thing I get out of that is that they didn't use bots -- which still doesn't mean they couldn't have planted stories.

For example, in a text from Jennifer Abel, according to Blake Lively’s complaint, she says this: “We've also started to see a shift on social, due largely to Jed and his team's
efforts to shift the narrative towards shining a spotlight on Blake and Ryan.”

What do lawyers have to say to that? Is that problematic for you, or does it still fail to pass muster given that it seems Justin was doing this to protect his reputation and it wasn't in retaliation to the SH claims?

I used to do sexual harassment/retaliation cases and you are totally right that this appears to be (1) retaliatory and (2) damaging. It has always been her strongest argument. But there’s a lot more she still has to prove - especially that the retaliation was due to her harassment complaint, which is not actually totally clear. She would also have to prove (for damages, not to prove the retaliation happened) that the damages to her brand sales and reputation are due to the retaliation and not other factors.

Too bad Justin didn’t consult with a lawyer who would have told him this was a dumb*ss move …