Donnie Dumptruck says Mar-A-Lago's been searched by the FBI

[Anonymous]

What is the FBI protocol for perp-walking a former president?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was

Enforcement t of the law isn’t gushed against the rank stupidity of the 34% of Americans who choose to deny reality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was

Enforcement t of the law isn’t gushed against the rank stupidity of the 34% of Americans who choose to deny reality.

^^^ gauged

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Republicans: This warrant is a farce! Show it to us!

DOJ: Okay.

Republicans: Wait, no, not like that!

You stole this from someone on Twitter. Just post the tweet like everyone else does.

Typical moocher.

I’m not the PP but they could have been the Twitter poster. I post both places and get retweeted a lot. Untwist your skirts. The real topic is that Trump is in big trouble for bad things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Trump statement - under the "Trump projection" rubric this totally means that there were classified nuclear documents at MAL, right?

Is this libel?

No. Let’s just put both Trump and Obama in a cell together and call it a day.

Why?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is the FBI protocol for perp-walking a former president?

I hope it’s like the one the Texas Rangers gave Oswald. Traitor.

[Anonymous]

Bigly Trouble in Little Gyna

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was

Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was

The only people who believe that are the dumbest of the dumb, and those people were already a solid Trump bloc.

[Anonymous]

Question for those who understand the classification stuff:

Does the rule exempting nuclear secrets from presidential declassification apply only to our own nuclear program, or also to that of other countries?

I would think that most countries pretty much know what we've got and where. But intel about what Iran has and where is more interesting, particularly to Israel, SA, Russia, etc. The WaPo leak didn't say it was our nukes, right?

(Not that I think the stupid "I declassified it by tweet" argument is legally defensible for any type of documents -- but just curious if there's a distinction here.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Question for those who understand the classification stuff:

Does the rule exempting nuclear secrets from presidential declassification apply only to our own nuclear program, or also to that of other countries?

I would think that most countries pretty much know what we've got and where. But intel about what Iran has and where is more interesting, particularly to Israel, SA, Russia, etc. The WaPo leak didn't say it was our nukes, right?

(Not that I think the stupid "I declassified it by tweet" argument is legally defensible for any type of documents -- but just curious if there's a distinction here.)

NP:
I can guarantee Israel has better intel on Iran’s nuke program than we do. Mossad has an entire on-the-ground spy program in Iran.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:New Trump statement - under the "Trump projection" rubric this totally means that there were classified nuclear documents at MAL, right?

Is this libel?

No. Let’s just put both Trump and Obama in a cell together and call it a day.

Why?

2 for 1 discount if they both took home nuclear secrets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was

Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...

hey, I said I'm waiting with bated breath to hear the credible reasons for the raid. If it's there, I'll be 100% on the FBI's side. Surprising to me though that Trump is the one advocating most loudly for release of the warrant.

He is not advocating for its release. He has it! He could have released it days ago. I can’t believe people are actually fooled by this stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was

Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...

hey, I said I'm waiting with bated breath to hear the credible reasons for the raid. If it's there, I'll be 100% on the FBI's side. Surprising to me though that Trump is the one advocating most loudly for release of the warrant.

Come on - you’re still giving trump the benefit of the doubt? After he yanked your chain so long over his taxes? He’s not going to agree to release the warrant, even if he says the opposite on social media. Stop being so gullible/partisan.

you too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Garland and the FBI didn't foresee the likelihood that Trump would claim they planted evidence and come out of this appealing to even more voters?
I sure hope they had a good and credible reasons for the raid. Waiting with bated breath to hear what it was

Please tell me you're a nitwit without using the word nitwit...

hey, I said I'm waiting with bated breath to hear the credible reasons for the raid. If it's there, I'll be 100% on the FBI's side. Surprising to me though that Trump is the one advocating most loudly for release of the warrant.

Come on - you’re still giving trump the benefit of the doubt? After he yanked your chain so long over his taxes? He’s not going to agree to release the warrant, even if he says the opposite on social media. Stop being so gullible/partisan.

you too.

Nope, I’m a straight shooter and calling it like I see it. Trump is a liar and bullsh#t artist, he’s going to fight the release of the warrant.

I can’t believe you’re falling for his crap - AGAIN.