The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This definitely doesn't look up to par for Givenchy. The puckering is everywhere and the embroidery design is cartoonish instead of jacobean like the original.

To much white space because Ivanka has breasts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love Melania's dress, sorry, I should stay off this forum.

She looked beautiful and the gown was custom. It was daring (for American fashion tbh, Americans are less daring, esp first ladies) and unusual for an inaugural gown. It’s hard to pull off a choker and Melania did. She trended less colonial and more continental today, and it’s disconcerting to some of the hayseeds.

Ivanka followed suit. They both looked fantastic.

Oooh, this is beautiful… another +1 for Ivanka! Finally the woman leverages her best asset… her beautiful figure, in a normal way. -OP

That is GORGEOUS. The fit, the line, the all of it.

+100
Absolutely stunning.

It looks like a dress from David’s Bridal.

https://www.davidsbridal.com/product/sheer-lace-and-tulle-ball-gown-wedding-dress-wg3861?defining_color=1759&defining_size_family=126&defining_size_dress=75&defining_extra_length=1&gclsrc=aw.ds&gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAAqAEId5htWRkaD_ZBteY9ae4dl7Kc&gclid=Cj0KCQiAqL28BhCrARIsACYJvkeifMf_3x1fdJCe1wNBY9POn3vYWFZEiddrRCPTTdrLMFQPeFY1YFEaAq-QEALw_wcB

Nailed it! Just tacky. So many amazing designers out there and this is the best she can do? Looks like something my 8 year old DD might have picked out for princess dress up.

DP. You know it’s a redesign by Givenchy, right? It’s absolutely gorgeous.

Yes absolutely. And it may have been lovely in the ‘50s on a 25 year old in a movie. Totally ridiculous princess fantasy today.

Disagree. It was beautiful. DP.

In the end, for me, she does cheapen it, even though it is a beautiful dress.

First I find the length a little bit awkward on her. It’s hitting at her… calves? Instead of taking advantage of her height and wearing something flowy there’s this weird hard stop at her calves.

Then the pattern. This is a dress that is so iconic and was worn by such a petite person and while Ivanka is not fat, she is really tall and the negative space of the pattern is off on her larger (ha!) body. It seems like there’s more white and less pattern and it looks off.

The dress is so perfect, and was so perfect, and on Ivanka it’s not the same.

I sort of blame Givenchy the fashion house for indulging Ivanka on this. There are so many ways to do an homage without producing a carbon copy. A dress with a different pattern, different cut, color…

The length seems off to me also.

Yes. It looks like a high-low hemline, which is dated and definitely ups the David's Bridal vibes.

White is NOT a great color for Ivanka, her hair is making her look incredibly harsh, which also throws off the delicate feel of the dress, and it's actually kind of "too young" for her. BAD.

Oh, wow - I completely disagree. I think she looks absolutely spectacular in this dress! The only thing I would have changed is removing the necklace. And the high/low hemline was original to the dress. Love it.

On Audrey it wasn’t a high low-it was tea length with a train over skirt. (Tea length was considered the appropriate length in the 1950s if it was not an evening event. ). I can’t remember the plot of the movie well enough but in the photos her costar is wearing a white jacket which also suggests it was an afternoon party, not evening wear. It would be consisted tacky to wear a full length to an afternoon party, hence tea length with the overslkirt for drama.

At any rate, The PP is right that the designer got the proportions a little wrong for Ivanka so it looks too short. PP is also right that the embroidery is not sized right in this dress. I still like the dress but it’s hard to wear a copy without inviting “who wore it best?” And you’re never going to beat the original here. It’s a nice dress but she’s no Audrey. I think something with a similar cut but maybe in an ice blue or lavender with navy or black embroidery would have been better on Ivanka.

Pp you are referring to and you actually read my mind! Blue would have been lovely, changing up the embroidery as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This definitely doesn't look up to par for Givenchy. The puckering is everywhere and the embroidery design is cartoonish instead of jacobean like the original.

Right? Why all the puckering? They could have picked another fabric. I wonder if what that fashion blogger said is true- intentional insult OR that cannot reproduce a garment with the same quality level

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This definitely doesn't look up to par for Givenchy. The puckering is everywhere and the embroidery design is cartoonish instead of jacobean like the original.

To much white space because Ivanka has breasts.

Additional white space to give the illusion of larger breasts, you mean? Her rack isn't exactly stacked, and the positioning of this embroidery is tighter than the original, with thinner lines. Maybe by request, as it does give the illusion of a bigger bustline.

But the fit is horrid; like something you'd get off-the-rack.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This definitely doesn't look up to par for Givenchy. The puckering is everywhere and the embroidery design is cartoonish instead of jacobean like the original.

To much white space because Ivanka has breasts.

This is a really stupid dress to try to copy and wear yourself when you have breasts. Lots of other fashion icons are easier to emulate than Audrey Hepburn when you have breasts.
- Someone with breasts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This definitely doesn't look up to par for Givenchy. The puckering is everywhere and the embroidery design is cartoonish instead of jacobean like the original.

Right? Why all the puckering? They could have picked another fabric. I wonder if what that fashion blogger said is true- intentional insult OR that cannot reproduce a garment with the same quality level

Or was it a rush job? They saved time if the design is screen printed with a little machine embroidery on top, but was the fabric and sewing lesser in quality because they didn't have as much time to make it?

Then again, how long do they get to make a gown for a movie?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember red corona virus/COVID red patterned dress that she wore to India right at the beginning of the pandemic? It’s hard to find a pic of that dress on the internet now.

I think so. Did she wear it in front of the Taj?

What do you think the reason is for it being so hard to find? Was the design really a virus pattern?

Not this one, is it?
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/11/30/fashion/29otr-D/29otr-D-superJumbo.jpg

I think it was this one:
https://c.ndtvimg.com/2020-02/sphmaj5k_ivanka-trump-in-india_625x300_24_February_20.jpg

OMG

Trump looks like such a weirdo in this picture. He isn't leaning forward to kiss his daughter. He just stands there and puckers. Weird.

https://c.ndtvimg.com/2020-02/sphmaj5k_ivanka...0_24_February_20.jpg

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On Vanky’s Audrey Hepburn dress.


“Even the most generous interpretation of her decision to recreate this iconic piece of Hollywood history—as an homage to the late Audrey—is exhausting in its unoriginality.

It’s probably pointless to speculate what Hepburn, a member of the Dutch resistance that sheltered Jews amid the Holocaust, would’ve thought of the Trump administration and the neo-Nazis he just pardoned.

If Ivanka’s intention was to honor Hepburn’s legacy, she could’ve done so in countless other ways—none of which involve her father’s administration.”

https://www.glamour.com/story/ivanka-trump-can-recreate-audrey-hepburns-gown-but-shes-not-fooling-anyone

The Hepburns were friends with Marla and her bio mother, Ivana. Hepburn’s son applauded it and her wearing it.

"Applauded" is not quite the word I would use

"In an interview with the Daily Mail, Sean Hepburn Ferrer graciously said he’s not surprised that Ivanka Trump would want to pay tribute to his mother. But Ferrer also indicated that his mother’s views wouldn’t align with Trump’s draconian policies and harsh rhetoric. Indeed, the Daily Mail reported that Ferrer “suggested” that his mother, a longtime UNICEF ambassador who survived Nazi occupation during World War II, would be sympathetic to criticism expressed by Right Rev. Mariann Budde, the Episcopal bishop of Washington"


https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/01/23/ivanka-trumps-icon-audrey-hepburn-would-share-bishops-criticism-of-trump-son-says/


Just because he is gracious enough not to call out Ivanka on her tackies, doesn't mean he's applauding. Let me guess, you only read the Fox News post about this?

Bravo for calling out the Fox News watcher who took Hepburn's son's quote waaay out of context. Thank you for taking the time to provide the context. I could not imagine at all that Hepburn's son would be cool with Trump's white supremacism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I finally figured out how to post image.I love the pattern on the dress but the saggy cleavage. . . .depressing.

Agree. That much cleavage looks cheap on younger women and depressing on older women. Who’s the woman on the left?

[Anonymous]

OMG now I can't unsee the "cartoonish" look of the embroidery.

[Anonymous]

There is an IG account vogue_cafe that compares Ivanka’s looks to ‘royals’ wearing the same thing. In every instance the ‘royal’, even MM, looked better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Kimberly on Sunday at a reception for the Greek-American community in DC.

This is really NOT the outfit to be wearing around an (celibate) Orthodox bishop, for Pete’s sake. What is this woman thinking? That the huge diamond cross would draw the eye away from her sad cleavage?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG now I can't unsee the "cartoonish" look of the embroidery.

Right? I also can’t unsee it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember red corona virus/COVID red patterned dress that she wore to India right at the beginning of the pandemic? It’s hard to find a pic of that dress on the internet now.

I think so. Did she wear it in front of the Taj?

What do you think the reason is for it being so hard to find? Was the design really a virus pattern?

Not this one, is it?
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/11/30/fashion/29otr-D/29otr-D-superJumbo.jpg

I think it was this one:
https://c.ndtvimg.com/2020-02/sphmaj5k_ivanka-trump-in-india_625x300_24_February_20.jpg

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This definitely doesn't look up to par for Givenchy. The puckering is everywhere and the embroidery design is cartoonish instead of jacobean like the original.

If, like me, checking this thread is your new religion, make sure to open up this post on your laptop so that you can get a real close up view of how terrible this dress is.

This was 100% done on purpose. The construction of the dress- awful. A home seamstress could have done better. Even if the embroidery was done by a machine and not by hand, it should have been better that this. Machine embroidery can do incredible things. This had to have been done to make Ivanka look bad.