GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I don’t know where you guys get this shit. Did you ever consider actually reading about his legal career, or do you repost things you saw in truth tweets and Facebook memes?

I don't read Facebook or truth social.

You can't find anything about Nathan Wade's qualifications. Even his own firm's bio resorts to using platitudes to describe his experience. It doesnt even say where he went to law school. https://wadeandcampbell.com/nathan-j-wade/


Lots of people have questions about why he was selected. Including WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/14/nathan-wade-fani-willis-georgia-trump/

His background quite obviously is more than dealing with parking tickets. This is why you guys can’t be taken seriously.

Sounds like he’s more qualified than Alina Habba.

It looks like he graduated from the bottom 10% law school.

You know what they call people who graduate from the bottom 10% law school? Hunt: same as what they call people who graduate from T17.

Lawyer.

Yeah but they normally don't make 600k and prosecute the former president as their very first trial.

Don't forget that $600K (closer to 700) is TAX PAYER MONEY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Proof that she received gifts and vacations from him? Even if she went on vacation with him, she probably paid her own way.

I am sure the attorney for the person bringing the claim has the receipts.
Interesting that she has not denied anything.

She could spend all day denying anything y'all come up with - or just respond appropriately to the motion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I don’t know where you guys get this shit. Did you ever consider actually reading about his legal career, or do you repost things you saw in truth tweets and Facebook memes?

I don't read Facebook or truth social.

You can't find anything about Nathan Wade's qualifications. Even his own firm's bio resorts to using platitudes to describe his experience. It doesnt even say where he went to law school. https://wadeandcampbell.com/nathan-j-wade/


Lots of people have questions about why he was selected. Including WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/14/nathan-wade-fani-willis-georgia-trump/

His background quite obviously is more than dealing with parking tickets. This is why you guys can’t be taken seriously.

Sounds like he’s more qualified than Alina Habba.

It looks like he graduated from the bottom 10% law school.

Evidence?

Good point. We are just assuming he graduated.

So you’re just making shit up. As I suspected. No reason to believe anything you people say.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I don’t know where you guys get this shit. Did you ever consider actually reading about his legal career, or do you repost things you saw in truth tweets and Facebook memes?

I don't read Facebook or truth social.

You can't find anything about Nathan Wade's qualifications. Even his own firm's bio resorts to using platitudes to describe his experience. It doesnt even say where he went to law school. https://wadeandcampbell.com/nathan-j-wade/


Lots of people have questions about why he was selected. Including WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/14/nathan-wade-fani-willis-georgia-trump/

His background quite obviously is more than dealing with parking tickets. This is why you guys can’t be taken seriously.

Sounds like he’s more qualified than Alina Habba.

It looks like he graduated from the bottom 10% law school.

You know what they call people who graduate from the bottom 10% law school? Hunt: same as what they call people who graduate from T17.

Lawyer.

Yeah but they normally don't make 600k and prosecute the former president as their very first trial.

I graduated from T17 and will never make $600k or prosecute anyone. So?

I find your comment strange. There's only one attorney that has been selected as the special prosecutor. It's Willis's bf.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Proof that she received gifts and vacations from him? Even if she went on vacation with him, she probably paid her own way.

I am sure the attorney for the person bringing the claim has the receipts.
Interesting that she has not denied anything.

The attorney filed the motion without any evidence at all. The burden of proof is on the party making the motion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I don’t know where you guys get this shit. Did you ever consider actually reading about his legal career, or do you repost things you saw in truth tweets and Facebook memes?

I don't read Facebook or truth social.

You can't find anything about Nathan Wade's qualifications. Even his own firm's bio resorts to using platitudes to describe his experience. It doesnt even say where he went to law school. https://wadeandcampbell.com/nathan-j-wade/


Lots of people have questions about why he was selected. Including WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/14/nathan-wade-fani-willis-georgia-trump/

His background quite obviously is more than dealing with parking tickets. This is why you guys can’t be taken seriously.

Sounds like he’s more qualified than Alina Habba.

It looks like he graduated from the bottom 10% law school.

You know what they call people who graduate from the bottom 10% law school? Hunt: same as what they call people who graduate from T17.

Lawyer.

Yeah but they normally don't make 600k and prosecute the former president as their very first trial.

I graduated from T17 and will never make $600k or prosecute anyone. So?

I find your comment strange. There's only one attorney that has been selected as the special prosecutor. It's Willis's bf.

Yet another lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I don’t know where you guys get this shit. Did you ever consider actually reading about his legal career, or do you repost things you saw in truth tweets and Facebook memes?

I don't read Facebook or truth social.

You can't find anything about Nathan Wade's qualifications. Even his own firm's bio resorts to using platitudes to describe his experience. It doesnt even say where he went to law school. https://wadeandcampbell.com/nathan-j-wade/


Lots of people have questions about why he was selected. Including WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/14/nathan-wade-fani-willis-georgia-trump/

His background quite obviously is more than dealing with parking tickets. This is why you guys can’t be taken seriously.

Sounds like he’s more qualified than Alina Habba.

It looks like he graduated from the bottom 10% law school.

You know what they call people who graduate from the bottom 10% law school? Hunt: same as what they call people who graduate from T17.

Lawyer.

Yeah but they normally don't make 600k and prosecute the former president as their very first trial.

I graduated from T17 and will never make $600k or prosecute anyone. So?

I find your comment strange. There's only one attorney that has been selected as the special prosecutor. It's Willis's bf.

...And those other attorneys that are also special prosecutors too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I don’t know where you guys get this shit. Did you ever consider actually reading about his legal career, or do you repost things you saw in truth tweets and Facebook memes?

I don't read Facebook or truth social.

You can't find anything about Nathan Wade's qualifications. Even his own firm's bio resorts to using platitudes to describe his experience. It doesnt even say where he went to law school. https://wadeandcampbell.com/nathan-j-wade/


Lots of people have questions about why he was selected. Including WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/14/nathan-wade-fani-willis-georgia-trump/

His background quite obviously is more than dealing with parking tickets. This is why you guys can’t be taken seriously.

Sounds like he’s more qualified than Alina Habba.

It looks like he graduated from the bottom 10% law school.

Evidence?

Good point. We are just assuming he graduated.

So you’re just making shit up. As I suspected. No reason to believe anything you people say.

You can go look up the college rankings. This isn't difficult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Proof that she received gifts and vacations from him? Even if she went on vacation with him, she probably paid her own way.

I am sure the attorney for the person bringing the claim has the receipts.
Interesting that she has not denied anything.

So you’re saying we should automatically believe any allegation made in a legal filing because “the attorney for the person bringing the claim has the receipts,” even when no evidence is presented?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Proof that she received gifts and vacations from him? Even if she went on vacation with him, she probably paid her own way.

I am sure the attorney for the person bringing the claim has the receipts.
Interesting that she has not denied anything.

The attorney filed the motion without any evidence at all. The burden of proof is on the party making the motion.

This is untrue. The evidence was already submitted in a previous court proceeding-- Willis's divorce case.

You're in total denial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Omg going on a vacay with your bf isn't a felony. Is it ethically questionable? Sometimes. Illegal? Nope.

DP
SHE approved his compensation.
SHE hired him without approval.

Yeah. His compensation is his and he can spend it however he wants, including on his gf.

Prior to being hired to prosecute a historic and unprecedented case, her boyfriend was a judge who mostly handled parking tickets. I think it's fair for anyone to question whether she hired the person best suited to the job, or if she hired her bf for 600k per year and benefitted from that compensation.

I don’t know where you guys get this shit. Did you ever consider actually reading about his legal career, or do you repost things you saw in truth tweets and Facebook memes?

I don't read Facebook or truth social.

You can't find anything about Nathan Wade's qualifications. Even his own firm's bio resorts to using platitudes to describe his experience. It doesnt even say where he went to law school. https://wadeandcampbell.com/nathan-j-wade/


Lots of people have questions about why he was selected. Including WaPo.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/01/14/nathan-wade-fani-willis-georgia-trump/

His background quite obviously is more than dealing with parking tickets. This is why you guys can’t be taken seriously.

Sounds like he’s more qualified than Alina Habba.

It looks like he graduated from the bottom 10% law school.

Evidence?

Good point. We are just assuming he graduated.

So you’re just making shit up. As I suspected. No reason to believe anything you people say.

You can go look up the college rankings. This isn't difficult.

You can look up where a person graduated in their law school class on a college ranking website?

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Proof that she received gifts and vacations from him? Even if she went on vacation with him, she probably paid her own way.

I am sure the attorney for the person bringing the claim has the receipts.
Interesting that she has not denied anything.

The attorney filed the motion without any evidence at all. The burden of proof is on the party making the motion.

This is untrue. The evidence was already submitted in a previous court proceeding-- Willis's divorce case.

You're in total denial.

Link to it then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Proof that she received gifts and vacations from him? Even if she went on vacation with him, she probably paid her own way.

I am sure the attorney for the person bringing the claim has the receipts.
Interesting that she has not denied anything.

The attorney filed the motion without any evidence at all. The burden of proof is on the party making the motion.

This is untrue. The evidence was already submitted in a previous court proceeding-- Willis's divorce case.

You're in total denial.

The sealed evidence? Have you seen it? I haven't.

Neither has anyone else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Proof that she received gifts and vacations from him? Even if she went on vacation with him, she probably paid her own way.

I am sure the attorney for the person bringing the claim has the receipts.
Interesting that she has not denied anything.

The attorney filed the motion without any evidence at all. The burden of proof is on the party making the motion.

This is untrue. The evidence was already submitted in a previous court proceeding-- Willis's divorce case.

You're in total denial.

The sealed evidence? Have you seen it? I haven't.

Neither has anyone else.

I see. So you have no evidence. Got it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. She's guilty as sin.

Could someone explain how this is a viable defense?

It would seem reasonable for Fani Willis to transfer the case to another prosecutor to avoid further fallout. However, I assume that would derail her political ambitions, as well as cut off the gravy train to her specially appointed prosecutor? Unfortunately, both of those ships have sailed - and even if she rushes the case to trial and conviction, she's creating grounds for appeal. Then again, she might not care about that if she gets the conviction, any more than Letitia James or Alvin Bragg in NY.

Defense? There's no crime.

Is this a violation of ethics rules? Possibly, I don't know GA that well but it doesn't seem like it. Are the optics bad, yes, but if no rules are broken then it's not illegal or a problem.

+1. All the MAGAs up in arms over an (alleged) workplace romance. So what? Pretty sure sex isn’t illegal.

Nobody cares who she has sex with.

The issues are that:

- she hired her unqualified, secret boyfriend—who had never tried a felony case—to prosecute the unprecedented RICO felony case against the leading opposing presidential candidate

- the appointment of this prosecutor was not approved by the Fulton board of commissioners as required by law

- Fani Willis is the person who authorizes his compensation.

- she paid her secret boyfriend over $600,000, including for secret collusion with the Biden White House before her indictment of Trump

- she took illegal kickbacks from her secret boyfriend and special prosecutor in the form of lavish domestic and international vacations

These are not rea issues, sorry not sorry.

The fact that she received gifts and vacations from the person she appointed and assigned a state compensation to, bypassing state hiring practices, is in fact a federal felony. So, yes, it is a "real issue".

Proof that she received gifts and vacations from him? Even if she went on vacation with him, she probably paid her own way.

I am sure the attorney for the person bringing the claim has the receipts.
Interesting that she has not denied anything.

The attorney filed the motion without any evidence at all. The burden of proof is on the party making the motion.

Except 'somebody' sealed Fannie's boyfriend's divorce proceedings which contains evidence. A motion has been filed to unseal this domestic case. Highly unusual for a routine divorce case to be sealed.