Brookeville bypass wasn't needed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why aren't we building a bypass around Washington DC, yet we can build this useless crap around a village

If by "village" you mean a dozen or so houses, okay.

It's not a village. No businesses (beyond Silo Falls). A smattering of houses and a church.

[Anonymous]

Brookeville is literally a town. By law. The Town of Brookeville. Since 1808.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why aren't we building a bypass around Washington DC, yet we can build this useless crap around a village

The bypass around Washington DC was completed in 1964.

[Anonymous]

Love the bypass. It's great for local residents.

Could careless if it bother commuters or random people in the county. Brookeville is a great, historical town that deserves preservation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This was a waste of money

Complete and total waste of money spearheaded by a former state legislator who wanted to make it easier to back out of her driveway onto Georgia Ave.

This is a rumor and not true at all

Says who?

I live in Brookeville btw. It's a pretty small town and people talk.

Regardless, the bypass ripped through woodland to avoid roughly a dozen houses owned by people who knew what they were getting into when they bought their homes on Georgia Ave. Making the case that it was all of a sudden too busy in the small town was a bit much. It isn't a town; it's a dozen+ houses. We rerouted traffic for the benefit of a ridiculously small amount of people. Why? The speed limit is very low and traffic is controlled by a stop sign at the only intersection. What was the issue? Big trucks? Guess what? There are steps that could have been taken to ban tractor trailers on a portion of the road. They could have opted to reroute big trucks. Instead they opted to reroute all traffic...and that begs the question, "Why?"

Because a former state legislator wanted to back out of her driveway on Georgia Ave.

Many millions of dollars later, we have a completely unnecessary major road cut through woodland. The impact on the local community center and adjacent field is a tragedy. BTW, why does the community center have such limited hours and limited activities? Ridiculous.

Feel free to join your local government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I still maintain this wasn't needed and the fact its a one lane road and not two in each direction with interchanges is a travesty.

It's not an interstate it's a 2 lane highway south of this to Olney and a two lane road north of this all the way to Carroll county. Putting in interchanges would wipe out half the town it was meant to bypass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brookeville is literally a town. By law. The Town of Brookeville. Since 1808.

Except its not, its an unincorporated area

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why aren't we building a bypass around Washington DC, yet we can build this useless crap around a village

The bypass around Washington DC was completed in 1964.

We should have started on the OUter Beltway like Houston

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brookeville is literally a town. By law. The Town of Brookeville. Since 1808.

Except its not, its an unincorporated area

False

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brookeville is literally a town. By law. The Town of Brookeville. Since 1808.

Except its not, its an unincorporated area

Olney is unincorporated. Brookeville is a town.

https://townofbrookevillemd.org/town-government/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still maintain this wasn't needed and the fact its a one lane road and not two in each direction with interchanges is a travesty.

It's not an interstate it's a 2 lane highway south of this to Olney and a two lane road north of this all the way to Carroll county. Putting in interchanges would wipe out half the town it was meant to bypass.

Not true at all, you don't know civil engineering and it shows, Larla. You can build a folded diamond interchange and bridges compact enough to where it provides limited access to the bypass.

[Anonymous]

Ok but has anybody found a completion date for the bypass?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why aren't we building a bypass around Washington DC, yet we can build this useless crap around a village

The bypass around Washington DC was completed in 1964.

Yep.

This anti Brookville bypass troll isn't the sharpest tool in the shed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why aren't we building a bypass around Washington DC, yet we can build this useless crap around a village

The bypass around Washington DC was completed in 1964.

Yep.

This anti Brookville bypass troll isn't the sharpest tool in the shed.

They're also the interchange troll as well

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ok but has anybody found a completion date for the bypass?

It's been done for months