I don't think that would be prudent. You are in really bad shape for retirement. You need to save everything possible. |
| Have you thought about community college and then having them transfer to a four year school for their degree? Who cares what their friends think? Who cares what your friends think? Your retirement is more important. |
No, but we have thought of in-state tuition, which of course would be quite a bit less than 40,000. |
|
You cannot pay full freight for your kids' college. It would be seriously unwise to fund that at the expense of your retirement. You can borrow for college, but not retirement. Time for a come to Jesus talk with your kids.
Best of luck. |
| I feel the urge to make more graphs. 100k a year at 6% minus deferred loans or low interest loans vs. Homelessness, but I can't figure out how to graph homelessness. |
First, even in that scenario, you need to dump everything into retirement savings. You've squandered 25-30 years of investment earnings, and now have 15 or so years to accumulate what typically takes people 40 years to save. If, as PP said, in 5 years you are in a good (or, I guess, better) position, you can pay off some loans. Second, and I mean no disrespect by this, the assumption that you are going to suddenly realize $100,000 in savings per year is overly optimistic, to say the least. You got where you are because of a lack of financial discipline and profligate spending. That's typically not something that goes away with a snap your fingers. For starters, you have to get everyone on board with this - what does your husband say? Is he OK with renting the $3000 house? Because you're going to be waving the Joneses goodbye. And every if everyone "agrees" to the plan, there are still going to be bumps along the road. If you commit to tuition you'll have to pay it, and then you won't be saving for retirement. Better to help them out later, if your circumstances permit. Good luck. |
|
Op is doomed to fail. If with an income like that they have jack shit saved, they aren't going to have the discipline to save $1k a year... forget $100k. They will end up with no money at 65, no home equity, be forced to work until they can't and then end up reliant on their children just as they enter their child bearing years.
|
+1 Holy crap, OP, do not even think about paying for your kids' college educations, or any more private school, for that matter. |
Wow...Sometimes I really do love this site aside from the nasty grammar gremlins. I am not the op, but you are so right about the deduction. This makes me want to do a spreadsheet
|
Studies show kids that pay for their own college do better. I had my first year paid for and fucked it up. My grandparents were like hell no! So I somehow made a way for the last three years. Since I graduated they paid off some of the loans, but I still owe $7K (15 years later - LOL). |
| why would you send kids to private school if you are in the BCC district? |
| No one really retires anymore |
| No one really retires anymore |
|
But surely, a $1.25 mil house will be worth a lot more by the time you are ready to retire, then you will most likely not even have a mortgage.
Then you can rent it out and live on the rent, or go for a reverse mortgage or sell it and get a small place and invest the rest then |
| You can rent out the basement to pay for college |