Biden Insiders Confess He Was Severely Cognitively Impaired

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Scott Bessent pointed out something this week:

Last year, more Americans went on trips to Europe than any other time in history.
Last year, more Americans than any time in history went to Food banks.

Haves and have nots.

When I was a child, we bought American. Mom looked for "made in the USA" and my family frequently struggled financially. Times have changed.

I would argue that we were sent right back to the 80’s and people are going to know what is made in the USA because it is the only affordable thing. We as consumers will have less choice and I know my family will be struggling financially. I don’t think we will be the only ones.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, no one give a f*ck. Seriously. Even if this is true, he is gone from politics and we now have a madman in office.

Get over it. There are much bigger issues to focus on right now.

Because no one gave a f*ck in the Democratic Party that’s why we now have a madman in office.

Fool me once with Hillary getting Trump elected, shame on you

Fool me twice with Biden getting Trump elected, she on me

You are responsible for the state of the country.

LOL, what?!?! So all the people who voted for Trump bear no responsibility for Trump winning the election? You have to be kidding.

They COULD have voted for Nikki Haley in the primary but they went for Trump because why????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No less than 4 books are coming out confirming everything that was alleged about Biden's deteriorating cognitive abilities and making it clear things were even worse.

So, what do we make of the fact that the Democrats flagrantly lied for over a year about Biden's mental degeneration, even going as far as to claiming it was Russian disinformation?

At this point, I think we can safely say that it is true that an unelected cabal took over Biden's presidency because he was not able to govern.

How do we square this kind of power-hungry betrayal of voters and America with the claim that Democrats are defending democracy?

Links:

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/apr/02/biden-ron-klain-trump-debate-prep-book-chris-whipple

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2025/04/06/books-biden-health-fight-uncharted/82791100007/

The books:

“Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again” by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson

“Fight: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House” by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes

“2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America” by Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf

“Uncharted: How Trump Beat Biden, Harris, and the Odds in the Wildest Campaign in History” by Chris

Revelations:

Vice President Kamala Harris' aides were so concerned about the president's health that they "strategized around the possibility that Biden might die in office." The authors report that Jamal Simmons, the vice president's communications director, drew up a “death-pool roster” of federal judges who could swear in Harris as president if Biden died.

Ron Klain, a longtime aide to Biden and his former White House chief of staff, helped the president prepare for his fateful debate with Trump last year. Klain told Whipple that Biden “didn’t know what Trump had been saying and couldn’t grasp what the back and forth was.”

Klain also described how Biden “didn’t really understand what his argument was on inflation” and “had nothing to say about a second term other than finish the job.”

Klain viewed Biden, then 81, as “out of it” and even “half-seriously” worried that Biden thought he was “president of NATO.”

I.Don't. Care.

Trump etc. lie on a daily -hourly- basis. And about Trump's very clear dementia. So F off with your fixation on Biden. Seriously. F all the way off.

[Anonymous]

Nice attempt to distract, troll. Yawn

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, no one give a f*ck. Seriously. Even if this is true, he is gone from politics and we now have a madman in office.

Get over it. There are much bigger issues to focus on right now.

Because no one gave a f*ck in the Democratic Party that’s why we now have a madman in office.

Fool me once with Hillary getting Trump elected, shame on you

Fool me twice with Biden getting Trump elected, she on me

You are responsible for the state of the country.

LOL, what?!?! So all the people who voted for Trump bear no responsibility for Trump winning the election? You have to be kidding.

They COULD have voted for Nikki Haley in the primary but they went for Trump because why????

+1 million
She was a great option

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No less than 4 books are coming out confirming everything that was alleged about Biden's deteriorating cognitive abilities and making it clear things were even worse.

So, what do we make of the fact that the Democrats flagrantly lied for over a year about Biden's mental degeneration, even going as far as to claiming it was Russian disinformation?

At this point, I think we can safely say that it is true that an unelected cabal took over Biden's presidency because he was not able to govern.

How do we square this kind of power-hungry betrayal of voters and America with the claim that Democrats are defending democracy?

Links:

https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/apr/02/biden-ron-klain-trump-debate-prep-book-chris-whipple

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2025/04/06/books-biden-health-fight-uncharted/82791100007/

The books:

“Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again” by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson

“Fight: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House” by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes

“2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America” by Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf

“Uncharted: How Trump Beat Biden, Harris, and the Odds in the Wildest Campaign in History” by Chris

Revelations:

Vice President Kamala Harris' aides were so concerned about the president's health that they "strategized around the possibility that Biden might die in office." The authors report that Jamal Simmons, the vice president's communications director, drew up a “death-pool roster” of federal judges who could swear in Harris as president if Biden died.

Ron Klain, a longtime aide to Biden and his former White House chief of staff, helped the president prepare for his fateful debate with Trump last year. Klain told Whipple that Biden “didn’t know what Trump had been saying and couldn’t grasp what the back and forth was.”

Klain also described how Biden “didn’t really understand what his argument was on inflation” and “had nothing to say about a second term other than finish the job.”

Klain viewed Biden, then 81, as “out of it” and even “half-seriously” worried that Biden thought he was “president of NATO.”

I.Don't. Care.

Trump etc. lie on a daily -hourly- basis. And about Trump's very clear dementia. So F off with your fixation on Biden. Seriously. F all the way off.

ooooh. Spicy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How about Donald? Are we going to wait until 2029 to hear about how severely cognitively impaired he was for the past 4 years?

Maybe we could speed up the process a bit? Don't the MAGA people love Vance? LFG

OrangeDon knew about Biden's state of condition. He wanted to win against him and thought he could win.

Jill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In any state of cognitive powers (which is totally Trumper bunk), Biden always upheld the Constitution and didn't act like the other 2 branches of government didn't exist.

You don't remember that he signed an order to forgive student loans--while admitting it was unconstitutional?

Also, Trump seems to be reclaiming Article II powers seized by the other branches. This has been done before by past presidents. That's upholding the Constitution. It will be up to the Supreme Court to decide if he's right or wrong. In the case of Biden claiming the power to forgive student loans, he never had it in the first place, but was casting about aimlessly to try and keep a campaign promise.

Tell us these great Presidents

I know you'll pull out some names but your side always leaves out something.

Try to keep it in the 20th century if you can

Certainly.

President Biden (successful) - Collins v. Yellen - The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 violated the separation of powers by creating a single director for the Federal Housing Finance Agency, removable by the President only “for cause.” On the day of the decision, President Joe Biden moved forward with replacing FHFA director, Mark A. Calabria, who had been appointed under Donald Trump, "with an appointee who reflects the Administration's values".

President Obama (successful) - Zivotofsky v. Kerry - Under the Reception Clause in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, only the President may grant formal recognition to a foreign sovereign, and Congress may not pass a law under its own authority to grant formal recognition or require the President to override a prior official determination of recognition. It was an improper act for Congress to “aggrandiz[e] its power at the expense of another branch” by requiring the President to contradict an earlier recognition determination in an official document issued by the Executive Branch. Freytag v. Commissioner, 501 U. S. 868, 878 (1991) . To allow Congress to control the President’s communication in the context of a formal recognition determination is to allow Congress to exercise that exclusive power itself. As a result, the statute is unconstitutional. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a concurring opinion.

President Obama (failed) - NLRB v. Canning - The Recess Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution empowers the President to fill any existing vacancy during any recess—intra-session or inter-session—of sufficient length, but three days is not sufficient length. Justice Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court, joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Breyer, writing for the Court, stated, "We hold that, for purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause, the Senate is in session when it says it is, provided that, under its own rules, it retains the capacity to transact Senate business."

President Reagan (successful) - Bowsher v. Synar - The court held that the Comptroller General's role in exercising executive functions under the Act's deficit reduction process violated the constitutionally imposed doctrine of separation of powers because the Comptroller General is removable only by a congressional joint resolution or by impeachment, and Congress may not retain the power of removal over an officer performing executive powers. To permit the execution of the laws to be vested in an officer answerable only to Congress would, in practical terms, reserve in Congress control of the execution of the laws. The structure of the Constitution does not permit Congress to execute the laws; it follows that Congress cannot grant to an officer under its control what it does not possess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Five months ago, the cover of The Economist, a conservative magazine, had a photo of a roll of money taking off like a rocket with the title: “American Economy: The Envy of the World”


Either you Biden bashers are stupid, or Russian and Chinese trolls.

He served honorably for his whole life. He got old. You will too. At least he had the integrity and professionalism to have good people around him who did their jobs well. Unlike our current criminal in chief.

Exactly. The People that try to equate Biden and Trump know there is no justification with this claim. Trump is trying to burn it all down and they know it.

[Anonymous]

At this point I'll take Dementia Joe over Destructive Dementia Donnie ant day of the week.

And, Republicans seriously need to stop lying, gaslighting and covering his dementia over. It is plain as day to see.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At this point I'll take Dementia Joe over Destructive Dementia Donnie ant day of the week.

And, Republicans seriously need to stop lying, gaslighting and covering his dementia over. It is plain as day to see.

Your idiotic progressive agendas are being crushed and you don't like it. Good.

[Anonymous]

Who cares? With Biden, we had a stable government, a economy that was the envy of the world, strong relations with our allies, infrastructure programs, and lower costs for insulin.

With Trump, we've had a unstable government with layoffs, our allies hating us, tariffs that will decimate our economy, and less freedoms. Not to mention, handing over our government to a billionaire.

What's funny is that we see Trump clearly cognitively impaired with his rambling speeches, wandering off during press events, and vacating in Mar a Lago. All the while, our country is experiencing severe crises, which Trump is woefully unprepared to take on, and i some cases, is completely responsible for creating this mess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In any state of cognitive powers (which is totally Trumper bunk), Biden always upheld the Constitution and didn't act like the other 2 branches of government didn't exist.

You don't remember that he signed an order to forgive student loans--while admitting it was unconstitutional?

Also, Trump seems to be reclaiming Article II powers seized by the other branches. This has been done before by past presidents. That's upholding the Constitution. It will be up to the Supreme Court to decide if he's right or wrong. In the case of Biden claiming the power to forgive student loans, he never had it in the first place, but was casting about aimlessly to try and keep a campaign promise.

Tell us these great Presidents

I know you'll pull out some names but your side always leaves out something.

Try to keep it in the 20th century if you can

Certainly.

President Biden (successful) - Collins v. Yellen - The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 violated the separation of powers by creating a single director for the Federal Housing Finance Agency, removable by the President only “for cause.” On the day of the decision, President Joe Biden moved forward with replacing FHFA director, Mark A. Calabria, who had been appointed under Donald Trump, "with an appointee who reflects the Administration's values".

President Obama (successful) - Zivotofsky v. Kerry - Under the Reception Clause in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, only the President may grant formal recognition to a foreign sovereign, and Congress may not pass a law under its own authority to grant formal recognition or require the President to override a prior official determination of recognition. It was an improper act for Congress to “aggrandiz[e] its power at the expense of another branch” by requiring the President to contradict an earlier recognition determination in an official document issued by the Executive Branch. Freytag v. Commissioner, 501 U. S. 868, 878 (1991) . To allow Congress to control the President’s communication in the context of a formal recognition determination is to allow Congress to exercise that exclusive power itself. As a result, the statute is unconstitutional. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a concurring opinion.

President Obama (failed) - NLRB v. Canning - The Recess Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution empowers the President to fill any existing vacancy during any recess—intra-session or inter-session—of sufficient length, but three days is not sufficient length. Justice Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court, joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Breyer, writing for the Court, stated, "We hold that, for purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause, the Senate is in session when it says it is, provided that, under its own rules, it retains the capacity to transact Senate business."

President Reagan (successful) - Bowsher v. Synar - The court held that the Comptroller General's role in exercising executive functions under the Act's deficit reduction process violated the constitutionally imposed doctrine of separation of powers because the Comptroller General is removable only by a congressional joint resolution or by impeachment, and Congress may not retain the power of removal over an officer performing executive powers. To permit the execution of the laws to be vested in an officer answerable only to Congress would, in practical terms, reserve in Congress control of the execution of the laws. The structure of the Constitution does not permit Congress to execute the laws; it follows that Congress cannot grant to an officer under its control what it does not possess.

Which one of those involves completely disrupting the rule of law?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

In any state of cognitive powers (which is totally Trumper bunk), Biden always upheld the Constitution and didn't act like the other 2 branches of government didn't exist.

You don't remember that he signed an order to forgive student loans--while admitting it was unconstitutional?

Also, Trump seems to be reclaiming Article II powers seized by the other branches. This has been done before by past presidents. That's upholding the Constitution. It will be up to the Supreme Court to decide if he's right or wrong. In the case of Biden claiming the power to forgive student loans, he never had it in the first place, but was casting about aimlessly to try and keep a campaign promise.

Tell us these great Presidents

I know you'll pull out some names but your side always leaves out something.

Try to keep it in the 20th century if you can

Certainly.

President Biden (successful) - Collins v. Yellen - The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 violated the separation of powers by creating a single director for the Federal Housing Finance Agency, removable by the President only “for cause.” On the day of the decision, President Joe Biden moved forward with replacing FHFA director, Mark A. Calabria, who had been appointed under Donald Trump, "with an appointee who reflects the Administration's values".

President Obama (successful) - Zivotofsky v. Kerry - Under the Reception Clause in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, only the President may grant formal recognition to a foreign sovereign, and Congress may not pass a law under its own authority to grant formal recognition or require the President to override a prior official determination of recognition. It was an improper act for Congress to “aggrandiz[e] its power at the expense of another branch” by requiring the President to contradict an earlier recognition determination in an official document issued by the Executive Branch. Freytag v. Commissioner, 501 U. S. 868, 878 (1991) . To allow Congress to control the President’s communication in the context of a formal recognition determination is to allow Congress to exercise that exclusive power itself. As a result, the statute is unconstitutional. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. Breyer, J., filed a concurring opinion.

President Obama (failed) - NLRB v. Canning - The Recess Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution empowers the President to fill any existing vacancy during any recess—intra-session or inter-session—of sufficient length, but three days is not sufficient length. Justice Breyer wrote the opinion of the Court, joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Breyer, writing for the Court, stated, "We hold that, for purposes of the Recess Appointments Clause, the Senate is in session when it says it is, provided that, under its own rules, it retains the capacity to transact Senate business."

President Reagan (successful) - Bowsher v. Synar - The court held that the Comptroller General's role in exercising executive functions under the Act's deficit reduction process violated the constitutionally imposed doctrine of separation of powers because the Comptroller General is removable only by a congressional joint resolution or by impeachment, and Congress may not retain the power of removal over an officer performing executive powers. To permit the execution of the laws to be vested in an officer answerable only to Congress would, in practical terms, reserve in Congress control of the execution of the laws. The structure of the Constitution does not permit Congress to execute the laws; it follows that Congress cannot grant to an officer under its control what it does not possess.

Oh my gosh, you are so smart

Now come back and list what Trump has done with his "powers." You had better warm up your keyboard

I think that typing will tire you out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At this point I'll take Dementia Joe over Destructive Dementia Donnie ant day of the week.

And, Republicans seriously need to stop lying, gaslighting and covering his dementia over. It is plain as day to see.

+1. Trump is clearly the one that is cognitively impaired and we are all experiencing the effects of his weakened state.