Downtown DC is a storefront ghost

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not "downtown" but still in the middle of DC-- I had to run an errand at Union Market today around 2 pm, and it was absolutely hopping. I drove to save time and I shouldnt have-- lot at UM was totally full, 6th Street spots totally full, no street parking on surrounding streets. Finally found a spot in the garage under the Latin market over on 4th. UM itself was packed, lines at bunch of stalls, indoor tables full, many outdoor tables as well. This was Wednesday afternoon, a lot of the weekend stalls were not even open, same with the bars. The Latin market was more dead but I popped into trader Joe's for a minute and it was busy too.

I've had similar experiences recently in Navy Yard, the Wharf, and Georgetown.

There is absolutely no reason you can't recreate this downtown with the right investment.


La Cosecha lost a bunch of tenants!

Not only do they have no dedicated parking, they turned the street parking in front into a parklet. Hopefully they figure it out before the whole concept fails.


Why would it be the parking given that Union Market is doing great? Two cars parked in the parklet space make zero difference. This is a city - there isn’t unlimited space for parking anyway. What actually will help is redoing Dave Thomas Circle to make it easier to walk/bike there. A better pedestrian connection from NoMa metro as well.

Because Union Market has an adjacent and convenient surface parking lot.


La Cosecha is steps away. Try again.

Blocks away. Do you even live in this city?


La Cosecha is like two blocks away. And there are small shops in between. This is a city- if people are that lazy they can’t walk two blocks then they are going to have complaints no matter what.

You have no idea how consumer behavior works. You wonder why this place is not doing as well as Urban Market and you cannot figure out that someone who parks at Urban Market would probably just rather eat something there than walk several blocks away. Seriously LOL.


It’s not a mall. It’s a city. And the restaurants around La Cosecha seem to be doing fine. Also there’s no place for additional parking so what are you even arguing about.

I guess it will just continue to only he a mystery to you and only you.


La Cosecha and its tenants chose to locate there. Where do you think they should have demanded parking?
And their tenants are choosing not to continue to do business there after discovering that its location is not conducive to profitability.

Starbucks spends ungodly sums of money to determine which corner of an intersection will be the most profitable to put a store but I appreciate your attitude. “It’s a city, people can walk”. LOL.


Is your vision that everyone should be able to drive everywhere and park for free right in front of the venue in DC? Because that is frankly bizarre. The business model of dense urban areas is for people to arrive by modes that don’t require parking, by definition. And Union Market doesn’t seem to lack for tenants.

You seem peeved that you cannot drive your car from NW and park wherever you want downtown for free. That’s as clueless as me complaining that I cannot take Metro to a rural stripmall.

The difference between me and you is that I have no personal views or agenda.

I am just pointing out patterns of consumer behavior and that seems to make you mad.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not "downtown" but still in the middle of DC-- I had to run an errand at Union Market today around 2 pm, and it was absolutely hopping. I drove to save time and I shouldnt have-- lot at UM was totally full, 6th Street spots totally full, no street parking on surrounding streets. Finally found a spot in the garage under the Latin market over on 4th. UM itself was packed, lines at bunch of stalls, indoor tables full, many outdoor tables as well. This was Wednesday afternoon, a lot of the weekend stalls were not even open, same with the bars. The Latin market was more dead but I popped into trader Joe's for a minute and it was busy too.

I've had similar experiences recently in Navy Yard, the Wharf, and Georgetown.

There is absolutely no reason you can't recreate this downtown with the right investment.

It’s hilarious that you don’t see the pattern.


PP here and I genuinely do not know what you are talking about. These are all neighborhoods that saw a ton of economic investment, do you mean that pattern? That is also what I think they should do downtown.

Also while Georgetown has been nice for a while, Union Market, Navy Yard, and the Wharf were all really rough neighborhoods before all this development went in. I live on Capitol Hill and the transformation is dramatic. As little as 10-15 years ago, these were neighborhoods you would not walk around in at night comfortable, they were just warehouses and crappy little shops, or empty lots. Union Market used to just be permanently filled with trash. There was violent crime and drug activity. Now these places are the bougie-est parts of DC. So there is absolutely no reason we can't do the same think downtown. It might look a little different because it's converting an office district instead of warehouses and industrial properties, but this idea it's impossible just does not add up. It obviously is.

The pattern is available parking (but not enough.


Navy Yard barely has any parking now (except for baseball games) and is inconveniently located but that hasn’t slowed its popularity. Downtown is central and served by every metro line. And there is some parking. If there was stuff bringing people downtown, they’d go.


Navy Yard has plenty of parking but is also easy to get to by Metro. I find parking in the Wharf to be much less practical and far more expensive.

DC government gave into the GGW ideologues and drastically cut available parking at the Wharf. It was a bad mistake that is dragging the Wharf down as a destination location. Cars are more routinely doubled parked along Maine Ave causing traffic congestion and people, like you, rightly second guess going due to the parking hassle. But there is minimally enough parking right now that it will survive but not really thrive as much as it could.

It’s funny though that the PPP is all gung ho about car free downtown DC living while documenting his exploits trying to find parking at Union Market.

The lack of convenient and reasonably priced parking will be a long term drag on downtown DC as both a neighborhood and a destination location.


I am not aware of any significant urban core that either lives or dies based on parking. Even downtown LA which is kind of hot these days has expensive parking…and everyone drives in LA.


I spend quite a lot of time in LA during the winter, specifically around Hollywood, Westwood, and downtown, and I have only rarely failed to find street parking within a block or two of where I needed to be. Compared to DC, LA is a parking spot paradise.


I actually rarely have trouble finding parking in DC, sometimes on the street and easily in any garage. However, I often Uber or metro…kind of based on the mood.

I just don’t see why parking is somehow uniquely critical to DC’s resurgence.


If I have to pay $40 to park, as is common in downtown DC during the day or at the Wharf any time ... then I'm not going. I can't be alone in this. The Wharf in particular is such bullshit. There's no street parking option, realistically, and the Metro is a shooty 3-block walk in the dark.

Or I suppose I could embrance the crazily jacked-up 2024 rates for an Uber ($50 round trip from my address in NWDC).


Ok then its not for you? I haven’t heard about Wharf businesses failing and it appears to be busy when I go. You can’t simultaneously demand no traffic, free street parking, and crowded urban entertainment. Just does not add up …


Have you followed the thread? Multiple people have advocated for plentiful and reasonably priced parking in (newly built) garages, as one element in successfully reimagining the downtown DC core. See Bethesda for a thriving real-life example.

The Wharf businesses are bustling with vacationing tourists and expense-account business travelers. Yay. Neither group blanches at the eye-watering parking prices because they’re taking ubers they don’t pay for or they’re on that once- a-year special anniversary hotel stay.

You can’t create an entire downtown on the backs of these two groups without canibalizing other parts of DC. You need to be attractive to a broader swath of the public — and $50-$75 transportation/ day doesn’t do that.
Anonymous
I just wanted to note that La Cosecha has a large parking garage underneath it where you can park for free for the first three hours. It is also used as overflow parking for Union Market.

Every large building being built in the Union Market area has a parking garage, there is zero reason to rely on street parking there. Eventually they'll get rid of the lot at UM to build another building there (with underground parking). Also eventually none of the parking in that neighborhood will be free unless you are shopping at Trader Joe's.

This is how urban development works.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I just wanted to note that La Cosecha has a large parking garage underneath it where you can park for free for the first three hours. It is also used as overflow parking for Union Market.

Every large building being built in the Union Market area has a parking garage, there is zero reason to rely on street parking there. Eventually they'll get rid of the lot at UM to build another building there (with underground parking). Also eventually none of the parking in that neighborhood will be free unless you are shopping at Trader Joe's.

This is how urban development works.

Surface parking lots and then above ground garages are more highly preferred than underground garages from a consumer standpoint. All of the surface lots at Pike and Rose fill first before the garages. In downtown Bethesda, the above ground lots fill before the underground lots which never fill. People will circle the garage in Bethesda Row for 15 minutes and not even consider parking in the underground garage just around the corner that has 700 spaces.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not "downtown" but still in the middle of DC-- I had to run an errand at Union Market today around 2 pm, and it was absolutely hopping. I drove to save time and I shouldnt have-- lot at UM was totally full, 6th Street spots totally full, no street parking on surrounding streets. Finally found a spot in the garage under the Latin market over on 4th. UM itself was packed, lines at bunch of stalls, indoor tables full, many outdoor tables as well. This was Wednesday afternoon, a lot of the weekend stalls were not even open, same with the bars. The Latin market was more dead but I popped into trader Joe's for a minute and it was busy too.

I've had similar experiences recently in Navy Yard, the Wharf, and Georgetown.

There is absolutely no reason you can't recreate this downtown with the right investment.


La Cosecha lost a bunch of tenants!

Not only do they have no dedicated parking, they turned the street parking in front into a parklet. Hopefully they figure it out before the whole concept fails.


Why would it be the parking given that Union Market is doing great? Two cars parked in the parklet space make zero difference. This is a city - there isn’t unlimited space for parking anyway. What actually will help is redoing Dave Thomas Circle to make it easier to walk/bike there. A better pedestrian connection from NoMa metro as well.

Because Union Market has an adjacent and convenient surface parking lot.


La Cosecha is steps away. Try again.

Blocks away. Do you even live in this city?


La Cosecha is like two blocks away. And there are small shops in between. This is a city- if people are that lazy they can’t walk two blocks then they are going to have complaints no matter what.

You have no idea how consumer behavior works. You wonder why this place is not doing as well as Urban Market and you cannot figure out that someone who parks at Urban Market would probably just rather eat something there than walk several blocks away. Seriously LOL.


I live in the neighborhood and La Cosecha has a ton of dedicated parking -- it right under the building and free for the first three hours. It's arguably much better than the parking at Union Market because it's in a parking garage so you can also park and go to La Cosecha without going outside in inclement weather, and is much more handicap accessible because there is an elevator.

People park at Union Market will walk to La Cosecha or other eateries in that part of the neighborhood. People park where they can park.

The two markets are very close -- two blocks. In between you have places like Last Call, St. Anselm, Maman bakery -- all of which are technically closer to La Cosecha actually. The new Pastis is on the same street as La Cosecha and not visible from Union Market. The Trader Joe's, Warby Parker, and Framebridge are all closer to La Cosecha.

The reason La Cosecha has struggled compared to Union Market is because they tried to scale up very quickly, I think figuring they could capitalize on the success of UM. The space is very built out with more permanent installations and fewer stalls (there's actually a lot of turnover in the stalls at Union Market, but it's not that hard for them to get replacement tenants because the stalls are fairly cheap to rent -- much harder to turnover a larger cafe space with a bar and seating, or a full restaurant build out like the one at the now-closed Las Gemelas at La Cosecha).

I also think La Cosecha has struggled with identity. By billing themselves as a Latin market, they narrow the potential businesses that can go in there (no such restriction at UM). It also means there's slightly less variety there, which might impact consumer interest. I say this as someone who love Las Gemelas and went often, and hits up Peruvian Bros. for empanadas once a week. Living in the neighborhood, I have friends come here often and it's harder to convince people to meet up at La Cosecha than Union Market, because I think people are unsure what to make of it and feel Union Market offers more options. La Cosecha is actually nicer (better seating, more pleasant outdoor area, and because it's less crowded, it's easier to sit) but I get that UM is more convenient to people.

The problem with La Cosecha is NOT lack of parking (they have free parking). It has to do with other things related to pricing and concept. They also got pretty screwed with their timing, due to the pandemic, which compacted their already accelerated scale up time.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just wanted to note that La Cosecha has a large parking garage underneath it where you can park for free for the first three hours. It is also used as overflow parking for Union Market.

Every large building being built in the Union Market area has a parking garage, there is zero reason to rely on street parking there. Eventually they'll get rid of the lot at UM to build another building there (with underground parking). Also eventually none of the parking in that neighborhood will be free unless you are shopping at Trader Joe's.

This is how urban development works.

Surface parking lots and then above ground garages are more highly preferred than underground garages from a consumer standpoint. All of the surface lots at Pike and Rose fill first before the garages. In downtown Bethesda, the above ground lots fill before the underground lots which never fill. People will circle the garage in Bethesda Row for 15 minutes and not even consider parking in the underground garage just around the corner that has 700 spaces.


It doesn't matter. Pike and Rose is in the suburbs. Surface lots are incredibly inefficient in the urban core and surface lots don't last. The surface lot at Union Market will be eliminated in the next few years. It's not even well maintained now -- it's nothing like the lots at Pike and Rose which were built to last a long time.

The developers who are building up Union Market are going to force all the parking underground because it allows them to put up buildings with street level retail and then high rise apartments, greatly increasing the value of the lot. Also, since the build up of the neighborhood involves so many apartments, the development is building in a customer base that does not even need a car, on top of the people who live nearby in NoMa. None of those people are going to drive to Union Market. These are people who bought there specifically so they could walk to all the amenities.

Development in the city and in the suburbs operates differently. Eventually it will be close to impossible to park in Union Market, and when you do, it will cost a lot of money, just like in Navy Yard or the Wharf. And suburbanites will complain. And no one will care because the neighborhood will have enough well off residents to sustain business there, and people from outside the city will just have to suck it up and pay a premium for underground parking, or use public transportation. And many of you will, because you actually like these destinations and they offer a lot more than anything you have in the burbs. Even at a place like Pike and Rose or the Mosaic District, which ultimately are just facsimiles of what the city offers. Sorry.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just wanted to note that La Cosecha has a large parking garage underneath it where you can park for free for the first three hours. It is also used as overflow parking for Union Market.

Every large building being built in the Union Market area has a parking garage, there is zero reason to rely on street parking there. Eventually they'll get rid of the lot at UM to build another building there (with underground parking). Also eventually none of the parking in that neighborhood will be free unless you are shopping at Trader Joe's.

This is how urban development works.

Surface parking lots and then above ground garages are more highly preferred than underground garages from a consumer standpoint. All of the surface lots at Pike and Rose fill first before the garages. In downtown Bethesda, the above ground lots fill before the underground lots which never fill. People will circle the garage in Bethesda Row for 15 minutes and not even consider parking in the underground garage just around the corner that has 700 spaces.


This is truly maddening behavior by drivers. They will circle, they will park in a bus stop/bike lane/fire hydrant zone, throw on their flashers in a travel lane for thirty minutes when a free or cheap garage is right there to use.

What is even going through their heads? Do they not know about the garage?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not "downtown" but still in the middle of DC-- I had to run an errand at Union Market today around 2 pm, and it was absolutely hopping. I drove to save time and I shouldnt have-- lot at UM was totally full, 6th Street spots totally full, no street parking on surrounding streets. Finally found a spot in the garage under the Latin market over on 4th. UM itself was packed, lines at bunch of stalls, indoor tables full, many outdoor tables as well. This was Wednesday afternoon, a lot of the weekend stalls were not even open, same with the bars. The Latin market was more dead but I popped into trader Joe's for a minute and it was busy too.

I've had similar experiences recently in Navy Yard, the Wharf, and Georgetown.

There is absolutely no reason you can't recreate this downtown with the right investment.


La Cosecha lost a bunch of tenants!

Not only do they have no dedicated parking, they turned the street parking in front into a parklet. Hopefully they figure it out before the whole concept fails.


Why would it be the parking given that Union Market is doing great? Two cars parked in the parklet space make zero difference. This is a city - there isn’t unlimited space for parking anyway. What actually will help is redoing Dave Thomas Circle to make it easier to walk/bike there. A better pedestrian connection from NoMa metro as well.

Because Union Market has an adjacent and convenient surface parking lot.


La Cosecha is steps away. Try again.

Blocks away. Do you even live in this city?


La Cosecha is like two blocks away. And there are small shops in between. This is a city- if people are that lazy they can’t walk two blocks then they are going to have complaints no matter what.

You have no idea how consumer behavior works. You wonder why this place is not doing as well as Urban Market and you cannot figure out that someone who parks at Urban Market would probably just rather eat something there than walk several blocks away. Seriously LOL.


It’s not a mall. It’s a city. And the restaurants around La Cosecha seem to be doing fine. Also there’s no place for additional parking so what are you even arguing about.

I guess it will just continue to only he a mystery to you and only you.


La Cosecha and its tenants chose to locate there. Where do you think they should have demanded parking?
And their tenants are choosing not to continue to do business there after discovering that its location is not conducive to profitability.

Starbucks spends ungodly sums of money to determine which corner of an intersection will be the most profitable to put a store but I appreciate your attitude. “It’s a city, people can walk”. LOL.


Is your vision that everyone should be able to drive everywhere and park for free right in front of the venue in DC? Because that is frankly bizarre. The business model of dense urban areas is for people to arrive by modes that don’t require parking, by definition. And Union Market doesn’t seem to lack for tenants.

You seem peeved that you cannot drive your car from NW and park wherever you want downtown for free. That’s as clueless as me complaining that I cannot take Metro to a rural stripmall.

The difference between me and you is that I have no personal views or agenda.

I am just pointing out patterns of consumer behavior and that seems to make you mad.


No you’re not objectively pointing out a “pattern of consumer behavior.” You’re actively claiming the obvious pattern of consumer behavior in a city isn’t happening.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just wanted to note that La Cosecha has a large parking garage underneath it where you can park for free for the first three hours. It is also used as overflow parking for Union Market.

Every large building being built in the Union Market area has a parking garage, there is zero reason to rely on street parking there. Eventually they'll get rid of the lot at UM to build another building there (with underground parking). Also eventually none of the parking in that neighborhood will be free unless you are shopping at Trader Joe's.

This is how urban development works.

Surface parking lots and then above ground garages are more highly preferred than underground garages from a consumer standpoint. All of the surface lots at Pike and Rose fill first before the garages. In downtown Bethesda, the above ground lots fill before the underground lots which never fill. People will circle the garage in Bethesda Row for 15 minutes and not even consider parking in the underground garage just around the corner that has 700 spaces.


Lol just stop. So not only are dense urban spaces supposed to cater to drivers, but it also has to be surface parking? Total clown show.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just wanted to note that La Cosecha has a large parking garage underneath it where you can park for free for the first three hours. It is also used as overflow parking for Union Market.

Every large building being built in the Union Market area has a parking garage, there is zero reason to rely on street parking there. Eventually they'll get rid of the lot at UM to build another building there (with underground parking). Also eventually none of the parking in that neighborhood will be free unless you are shopping at Trader Joe's.

This is how urban development works.

Surface parking lots and then above ground garages are more highly preferred than underground garages from a consumer standpoint. All of the surface lots at Pike and Rose fill first before the garages. In downtown Bethesda, the above ground lots fill before the underground lots which never fill. People will circle the garage in Bethesda Row for 15 minutes and not even consider parking in the underground garage just around the corner that has 700 spaces.


This is truly maddening behavior by drivers. They will circle, they will park in a bus stop/bike lane/fire hydrant zone, throw on their flashers in a travel lane for thirty minutes when a free or cheap garage is right there to use.

What is even going through their heads? Do they not know about the garage?


This is why I don’t like areas like Bethesda. All the worst parts of a suburb with none of the charm of the city or actual space of a suburb. I much prefer actual urban areas friendly to pedestrians, even if the open space is shared (eg parks) instead of my own backyard.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just wanted to note that La Cosecha has a large parking garage underneath it where you can park for free for the first three hours. It is also used as overflow parking for Union Market.

Every large building being built in the Union Market area has a parking garage, there is zero reason to rely on street parking there. Eventually they'll get rid of the lot at UM to build another building there (with underground parking). Also eventually none of the parking in that neighborhood will be free unless you are shopping at Trader Joe's.

This is how urban development works.

Surface parking lots and then above ground garages are more highly preferred than underground garages from a consumer standpoint. All of the surface lots at Pike and Rose fill first before the garages. In downtown Bethesda, the above ground lots fill before the underground lots which never fill. People will circle the garage in Bethesda Row for 15 minutes and not even consider parking in the underground garage just around the corner that has 700 spaces.


It doesn't matter. Pike and Rose is in the suburbs. Surface lots are incredibly inefficient in the urban core and surface lots don't last. The surface lot at Union Market will be eliminated in the next few years. It's not even well maintained now -- it's nothing like the lots at Pike and Rose which were built to last a long time.

The developers who are building up Union Market are going to force all the parking underground because it allows them to put up buildings with street level retail and then high rise apartments, greatly increasing the value of the lot. Also, since the build up of the neighborhood involves so many apartments, the development is building in a customer base that does not even need a car, on top of the people who live nearby in NoMa. None of those people are going to drive to Union Market. These are people who bought there specifically so they could walk to all the amenities.

Development in the city and in the suburbs operates differently. Eventually it will be close to impossible to park in Union Market, and when you do, it will cost a lot of money, just like in Navy Yard or the Wharf. And suburbanites will complain. And no one will care because the neighborhood will have enough well off residents to sustain business there, and people from outside the city will just have to suck it up and pay a premium for underground parking, or use public transportation. And many of you will, because you actually like these destinations and they offer a lot more than anything you have in the burbs. Even at a place like Pike and Rose or the Mosaic District, which ultimately are just facsimiles of what the city offers. Sorry.


^^exactly. PP in denial about what the market actually wants (dense, walkable, transit). You’ll always be able to drive and park in city centers - but you’re going to have to pay a premium (which is logical since there’s more demand for space) and deal with traffic (also logical). PP wants the suburbs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not "downtown" but still in the middle of DC-- I had to run an errand at Union Market today around 2 pm, and it was absolutely hopping. I drove to save time and I shouldnt have-- lot at UM was totally full, 6th Street spots totally full, no street parking on surrounding streets. Finally found a spot in the garage under the Latin market over on 4th. UM itself was packed, lines at bunch of stalls, indoor tables full, many outdoor tables as well. This was Wednesday afternoon, a lot of the weekend stalls were not even open, same with the bars. The Latin market was more dead but I popped into trader Joe's for a minute and it was busy too.

I've had similar experiences recently in Navy Yard, the Wharf, and Georgetown.

There is absolutely no reason you can't recreate this downtown with the right investment.

It’s hilarious that you don’t see the pattern.


PP here and I genuinely do not know what you are talking about. These are all neighborhoods that saw a ton of economic investment, do you mean that pattern? That is also what I think they should do downtown.

Also while Georgetown has been nice for a while, Union Market, Navy Yard, and the Wharf were all really rough neighborhoods before all this development went in. I live on Capitol Hill and the transformation is dramatic. As little as 10-15 years ago, these were neighborhoods you would not walk around in at night comfortable, they were just warehouses and crappy little shops, or empty lots. Union Market used to just be permanently filled with trash. There was violent crime and drug activity. Now these places are the bougie-est parts of DC. So there is absolutely no reason we can't do the same think downtown. It might look a little different because it's converting an office district instead of warehouses and industrial properties, but this idea it's impossible just does not add up. It obviously is.

The pattern is available parking (but not enough.


Navy Yard barely has any parking now (except for baseball games) and is inconveniently located but that hasn’t slowed its popularity. Downtown is central and served by every metro line. And there is some parking. If there was stuff bringing people downtown, they’d go.


Navy Yard has plenty of parking but is also easy to get to by Metro. I find parking in the Wharf to be much less practical and far more expensive.

DC government gave into the GGW ideologues and drastically cut available parking at the Wharf. It was a bad mistake that is dragging the Wharf down as a destination location. Cars are more routinely doubled parked along Maine Ave causing traffic congestion and people, like you, rightly second guess going due to the parking hassle. But there is minimally enough parking right now that it will survive but not really thrive as much as it could.

It’s funny though that the PPP is all gung ho about car free downtown DC living while documenting his exploits trying to find parking at Union Market.

The lack of convenient and reasonably priced parking will be a long term drag on downtown DC as both a neighborhood and a destination location.


I am not aware of any significant urban core that either lives or dies based on parking. Even downtown LA which is kind of hot these days has expensive parking…and everyone drives in LA.


I spend quite a lot of time in LA during the winter, specifically around Hollywood, Westwood, and downtown, and I have only rarely failed to find street parking within a block or two of where I needed to be. Compared to DC, LA is a parking spot paradise.


I actually rarely have trouble finding parking in DC, sometimes on the street and easily in any garage. However, I often Uber or metro…kind of based on the mood.

I just don’t see why parking is somehow uniquely critical to DC’s resurgence.


If I have to pay $40 to park, as is common in downtown DC during the day or at the Wharf any time ... then I'm not going. I can't be alone in this. The Wharf in particular is such bullshit. There's no street parking option, realistically, and the Metro is a shooty 3-block walk in the dark.

Or I suppose I could embrance the crazily jacked-up 2024 rates for an Uber ($50 round trip from my address in NWDC).


Or you could take the free shuttle to the metro.


Or bike or take a short uber ride. Somehow people are managing to get to the Wharf. PP is essentially saying he feels entitled to access all parts of the city for free in his personal car, apparently because he lives in an expensive NW house. It’s laughable.


Does GGW staff a full time intern to obsessively monitor this and similar sites?





Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just wanted to note that La Cosecha has a large parking garage underneath it where you can park for free for the first three hours. It is also used as overflow parking for Union Market.

Every large building being built in the Union Market area has a parking garage, there is zero reason to rely on street parking there. Eventually they'll get rid of the lot at UM to build another building there (with underground parking). Also eventually none of the parking in that neighborhood will be free unless you are shopping at Trader Joe's.

This is how urban development works.

Surface parking lots and then above ground garages are more highly preferred than underground garages from a consumer standpoint. All of the surface lots at Pike and Rose fill first before the garages. In downtown Bethesda, the above ground lots fill before the underground lots which never fill. People will circle the garage in Bethesda Row for 15 minutes and not even consider parking in the underground garage just around the corner that has 700 spaces.


It doesn't matter. Pike and Rose is in the suburbs. Surface lots are incredibly inefficient in the urban core and surface lots don't last. The surface lot at Union Market will be eliminated in the next few years. It's not even well maintained now -- it's nothing like the lots at Pike and Rose which were built to last a long time.

The developers who are building up Union Market are going to force all the parking underground because it allows them to put up buildings with street level retail and then high rise apartments, greatly increasing the value of the lot. Also, since the build up of the neighborhood involves so many apartments, the development is building in a customer base that does not even need a car, on top of the people who live nearby in NoMa. None of those people are going to drive to Union Market. These are people who bought there specifically so they could walk to all the amenities.

Development in the city and in the suburbs operates differently. Eventually it will be close to impossible to park in Union Market, and when you do, it will cost a lot of money, just like in Navy Yard or the Wharf. And suburbanites will complain. And no one will care because the neighborhood will have enough well off residents to sustain business there, and people from outside the city will just have to suck it up and pay a premium for underground parking, or use public transportation. And many of you will, because you actually like these destinations and they offer a lot more than anything you have in the burbs. Even at a place like Pike and Rose or the Mosaic District, which ultimately are just facsimiles of what the city offers. Sorry.


Hm. The ratio of 28 yr olds without kids or a mortgage relative to the rest of the adults in DC and the close suburbs is lopsided in favor of the latter. Spoiler alert - the group that doesn’t live in the micro apartments has more disposable income.

But, feel free to push the vision that the younger, carless renters alone can sustain the kind of CRE conversion needed in downtown DC
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Not "downtown" but still in the middle of DC-- I had to run an errand at Union Market today around 2 pm, and it was absolutely hopping. I drove to save time and I shouldnt have-- lot at UM was totally full, 6th Street spots totally full, no street parking on surrounding streets. Finally found a spot in the garage under the Latin market over on 4th. UM itself was packed, lines at bunch of stalls, indoor tables full, many outdoor tables as well. This was Wednesday afternoon, a lot of the weekend stalls were not even open, same with the bars. The Latin market was more dead but I popped into trader Joe's for a minute and it was busy too.

I've had similar experiences recently in Navy Yard, the Wharf, and Georgetown.

There is absolutely no reason you can't recreate this downtown with the right investment.

It’s hilarious that you don’t see the pattern.


PP here and I genuinely do not know what you are talking about. These are all neighborhoods that saw a ton of economic investment, do you mean that pattern? That is also what I think they should do downtown.

Also while Georgetown has been nice for a while, Union Market, Navy Yard, and the Wharf were all really rough neighborhoods before all this development went in. I live on Capitol Hill and the transformation is dramatic. As little as 10-15 years ago, these were neighborhoods you would not walk around in at night comfortable, they were just warehouses and crappy little shops, or empty lots. Union Market used to just be permanently filled with trash. There was violent crime and drug activity. Now these places are the bougie-est parts of DC. So there is absolutely no reason we can't do the same think downtown. It might look a little different because it's converting an office district instead of warehouses and industrial properties, but this idea it's impossible just does not add up. It obviously is.

The pattern is available parking (but not enough.


Navy Yard barely has any parking now (except for baseball games) and is inconveniently located but that hasn’t slowed its popularity. Downtown is central and served by every metro line. And there is some parking. If there was stuff bringing people downtown, they’d go.


Navy Yard has plenty of parking but is also easy to get to by Metro. I find parking in the Wharf to be much less practical and far more expensive.

DC government gave into the GGW ideologues and drastically cut available parking at the Wharf. It was a bad mistake that is dragging the Wharf down as a destination location. Cars are more routinely doubled parked along Maine Ave causing traffic congestion and people, like you, rightly second guess going due to the parking hassle. But there is minimally enough parking right now that it will survive but not really thrive as much as it could.

It’s funny though that the PPP is all gung ho about car free downtown DC living while documenting his exploits trying to find parking at Union Market.

The lack of convenient and reasonably priced parking will be a long term drag on downtown DC as both a neighborhood and a destination location.


I am not aware of any significant urban core that either lives or dies based on parking. Even downtown LA which is kind of hot these days has expensive parking…and everyone drives in LA.


I spend quite a lot of time in LA during the winter, specifically around Hollywood, Westwood, and downtown, and I have only rarely failed to find street parking within a block or two of where I needed to be. Compared to DC, LA is a parking spot paradise.


I actually rarely have trouble finding parking in DC, sometimes on the street and easily in any garage. However, I often Uber or metro…kind of based on the mood.

I just don’t see why parking is somehow uniquely critical to DC’s resurgence.


If I have to pay $40 to park, as is common in downtown DC during the day or at the Wharf any time ... then I'm not going. I can't be alone in this. The Wharf in particular is such bullshit. There's no street parking option, realistically, and the Metro is a shooty 3-block walk in the dark.

Or I suppose I could embrance the crazily jacked-up 2024 rates for an Uber ($50 round trip from my address in NWDC).


Or you could take the free shuttle to the metro.


Or bike or take a short uber ride. Somehow people are managing to get to the Wharf. PP is essentially saying he feels entitled to access all parts of the city for free in his personal car, apparently because he lives in an expensive NW house. It’s laughable.


Does GGW staff a full time intern to obsessively monitor this and similar sites?



Someone’s obsessive, and it’s not the people pointing out the obvious fact that people walk/metro in city areas like Union Market and the Wharf, and if you do drive, it will be expensive and inconvenient.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I just wanted to note that La Cosecha has a large parking garage underneath it where you can park for free for the first three hours. It is also used as overflow parking for Union Market.

Every large building being built in the Union Market area has a parking garage, there is zero reason to rely on street parking there. Eventually they'll get rid of the lot at UM to build another building there (with underground parking). Also eventually none of the parking in that neighborhood will be free unless you are shopping at Trader Joe's.

This is how urban development works.

Surface parking lots and then above ground garages are more highly preferred than underground garages from a consumer standpoint. All of the surface lots at Pike and Rose fill first before the garages. In downtown Bethesda, the above ground lots fill before the underground lots which never fill. People will circle the garage in Bethesda Row for 15 minutes and not even consider parking in the underground garage just around the corner that has 700 spaces.


It doesn't matter. Pike and Rose is in the suburbs. Surface lots are incredibly inefficient in the urban core and surface lots don't last. The surface lot at Union Market will be eliminated in the next few years. It's not even well maintained now -- it's nothing like the lots at Pike and Rose which were built to last a long time.

The developers who are building up Union Market are going to force all the parking underground because it allows them to put up buildings with street level retail and then high rise apartments, greatly increasing the value of the lot. Also, since the build up of the neighborhood involves so many apartments, the development is building in a customer base that does not even need a car, on top of the people who live nearby in NoMa. None of those people are going to drive to Union Market. These are people who bought there specifically so they could walk to all the amenities.

Development in the city and in the suburbs operates differently. Eventually it will be close to impossible to park in Union Market, and when you do, it will cost a lot of money, just like in Navy Yard or the Wharf. And suburbanites will complain. And no one will care because the neighborhood will have enough well off residents to sustain business there, and people from outside the city will just have to suck it up and pay a premium for underground parking, or use public transportation. And many of you will, because you actually like these destinations and they offer a lot more than anything you have in the burbs. Even at a place like Pike and Rose or the Mosaic District, which ultimately are just facsimiles of what the city offers. Sorry.


Hm. The ratio of 28 yr olds without kids or a mortgage relative to the rest of the adults in DC and the close suburbs is lopsided in favor of the latter. Spoiler alert - the group that doesn’t live in the micro apartments has more disposable income.

But, feel free to push the vision that the younger, carless renters alone can sustain the kind of CRE conversion needed in downtown DC


I don’t even understand what that word salad meant.

The rest of us get that driving to a city center and parking in a surface lot or street for cheap, right in front of the restaurant you want to go to, is not really a thing.

If you chose to live driving distance away from the city core and won’t take metro, it is what it is.

I don’t think turning downtown DC into a stripmall is anyone’s notion of an economic turnaround plan.
post reply Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Message Quick Reply
Go to: