Kristen Stewart’s new newest look

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had insane chemistry with RP in the Twilight movies. That’s why they’re so successful. Because of the two of them. And then she cheated on him! And Trump hates her!

I’m a fan of Indy movies and she’s in a lot of good ones. She’s a talented actress.

I don’t like most of her Chanel outfits. They seem unflattering. I’m guessing people in Europe or (what countries is Chanel targeting??) find her stylish or attractive. Chanel are no dummies. They also dress Margaret Qually a lot, another kind of quirky looking (though less quirky than Kristen) actress. Margaret is a fantastic actress - see Maid. So…l think Chanel has great taste in actresses, even though l don’t like how they dress Kristen.

This was a pure PR relationship, they were never together. It was all marketing for those shitty films.

+1, she’s clearly a full time player for the other team and can’t act interested in men, even when she really, really wants to.

Are you being homophobic?

No. I’m just saying it’s clear that Kristen isn’t interested in men and that her “relationship” with RP was a PR stunt. If anyone is homophobic, it’s the people involved in that sham, not I.

You people are weird. She and RP were clearly physically really into each other. And then the person she cheated on him with was another guy. So clearly she’s bi. But why do you even care?

I don't care either way but I do feel like she'll ultimately end up with a cis guy.

She's married to a woman

Could it be for publicity?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had insane chemistry with RP in the Twilight movies. That’s why they’re so successful. Because of the two of them. And then she cheated on him! And Trump hates her!

I’m a fan of Indy movies and she’s in a lot of good ones. She’s a talented actress.

I don’t like most of her Chanel outfits. They seem unflattering. I’m guessing people in Europe or (what countries is Chanel targeting??) find her stylish or attractive. Chanel are no dummies. They also dress Margaret Qually a lot, another kind of quirky looking (though less quirky than Kristen) actress. Margaret is a fantastic actress - see Maid. So…l think Chanel has great taste in actresses, even though l don’t like how they dress Kristen.

This was a pure PR relationship, they were never together. It was all marketing for those shitty films.

+1, she’s clearly a full time player for the other team and can’t act interested in men, even when she really, really wants to.

Are you being homophobic?

No. I’m just saying it’s clear that Kristen isn’t interested in men and that her “relationship” with RP was a PR stunt. If anyone is homophobic, it’s the people involved in that sham, not I.

You people are weird. She and RP were clearly physically really into each other. And then the person she cheated on him with was another guy. So clearly she’s bi. But why do you even care?

I don't care either way but I do feel like she'll ultimately end up with a cis guy.

She's married to a woman

Could it be for publicity?

Well they did basically no wedding publicity (it's honestly not actually for sure they are married because they have been relatively close lipped about it) and are rarely photographed together even and the wife is not a celebrity so I'd say...no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She had insane chemistry with RP in the Twilight movies. That’s why they’re so successful. Because of the two of them. And then she cheated on him! And Trump hates her!

I’m a fan of Indy movies and she’s in a lot of good ones. She’s a talented actress.

I don’t like most of her Chanel outfits. They seem unflattering. I’m guessing people in Europe or (what countries is Chanel targeting??) find her stylish or attractive. Chanel are no dummies. They also dress Margaret Qually a lot, another kind of quirky looking (though less quirky than Kristen) actress. Margaret is a fantastic actress - see Maid. So…l think Chanel has great taste in actresses, even though l don’t like how they dress Kristen.

This was a pure PR relationship, they were never together. It was all marketing for those shitty films.

+1, she’s clearly a full time player for the other team and can’t act interested in men, even when she really, really wants to.

Are you being homophobic?

No. I’m just saying it’s clear that Kristen isn’t interested in men and that her “relationship” with RP was a PR stunt. If anyone is homophobic, it’s the people involved in that sham, not I.

You people are weird. She and RP were clearly physically really into each other. And then the person she cheated on him with was another guy. So clearly she’s bi. But why do you even care?

I don't care either way but I do feel like she'll ultimately end up with a cis guy.

She's married to a woman

Could it be for publicity?

Well they did basically no wedding publicity (it's honestly not actually for sure they are married because they have been relatively close lipped about it) and are rarely photographed together even and the wife is not a celebrity so I'd say...no?

The whisper is enough...What you describe sounds potentially like a PR stunt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

I don't understand how anyone could possibly feel this strongly about a woman who has mostly been in indie movies for the last decade. WTF is she doing to you? You seem livid at her very existence. And that, to me, frankly, screams some type of prejudice. A woman who clearly doesn't give a flying eff about what people think about her? A lesbian? A woman who went through a public scandal and had the audacity to not be forced into a basement with a scarlet A? Are you a Robert Pattinson fan? Because honestly the vitriol in this thread for a fairly under the radar actress is baffling. This is too much emotion to have about someone you don't know.

+ 1 I agree with this take. That poster is nuts. Or they are enjoying at playing nuts for the sake of extending a very silly thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

Let’s turn to someone with more knowledge and credibility than you. From Manohla Dargis, one of the NYT film critics, on Stewart’s acting skills:

“Watching Kristen Stewart is always an adventure. A performer who makes good movies better and dreary movies tolerable, she has a restlessness that has made her one of the more interesting attractions in American film. She has a gift for making a character’s inner life transparently readable, and while she can be subtle and withholding, it is her fascinatingly unquiet presence that draws you in, an itchy intensity that can keep her (and you) on edge. Pauline Kael wrote that Jane Fonda’s “motor runs a little fast” — so does Stewart’s.”

You’re joking, right? Speaking of struggling finances, no one is worse off than journalists and newspapers. They have no circulation anymore and tons of competition with bloggers, etc. They’re casualties of the internet, unable to compete with changing times. AI will only make it worse in terms of bogus reviews.

Would I trust a critic in 1980? Sure, of course. But today, if you pay them a little, and I do mean, a little, they’ll publish anything you want them to say.

Kristen Stewart cannot act. I don’t care how much (or rather how little) she or whoever is trying to promote her paid Manhola Dargis to say otherwise. She cannot act!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

Let’s turn to someone with more knowledge and credibility than you. From Manohla Dargis, one of the NYT film critics, on Stewart’s acting skills:

“Watching Kristen Stewart is always an adventure. A performer who makes good movies better and dreary movies tolerable, she has a restlessness that has made her one of the more interesting attractions in American film. She has a gift for making a character’s inner life transparently readable, and while she can be subtle and withholding, it is her fascinatingly unquiet presence that draws you in, an itchy intensity that can keep her (and you) on edge. Pauline Kael wrote that Jane Fonda’s “motor runs a little fast” — so does Stewart’s.”

You’re joking, right? Speaking of struggling finances, no one is worse off than journalists and newspapers. They have no circulation anymore and tons of competition with bloggers, etc. They’re casualties of the internet, unable to compete with changing times. AI will only make it worse in terms of bogus reviews.

Would I trust a critic in 1980? Sure, of course. But today, if you pay them a little, and I do mean, a little, they’ll publish anything you want them to say.

Kristen Stewart cannot act. I don’t care how much (or rather how little) she or whoever is trying to promote her paid Manhola Dargis to say otherwise. She cannot act!

How many times have you said this already? It''s like a mantra, or dementia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

I don't understand how anyone could possibly feel this strongly about a woman who has mostly been in indie movies for the last decade. WTF is she doing to you? You seem livid at her very existence. And that, to me, frankly, screams some type of prejudice. A woman who clearly doesn't give a flying eff about what people think about her? A lesbian? A woman who went through a public scandal and had the audacity to not be forced into a basement with a scarlet A? Are you a Robert Pattinson fan? Because honestly the vitriol in this thread for a fairly under the radar actress is baffling. This is too much emotion to have about someone you don't know.

Seems like the appearance of arrogance and the possible self-indulgence on her part, might upset people.

I mean, to me that reads "seems like the fact that she likes herself upsets people". Because all she's really done is walk around new york during a press tour in provocative clothes and continue to act, both of which are things loads of other actors/actresses do without people seeming to like self implode in response.

No, she organized and paid for people to film and distribute a video of her tripping around in stilettos (and even here in DCUM). That’s what’s annoying, not that she walked around or whatever. Lots of actors and actresses live in NYC, no one chases after them unless they are invited and to do so.

What’s infuriating is the pathetic PR and the insulting of our intelligence. Why do people in the business think their audiences are so stupid? Have a little respect for us if you want us to watch your crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

Let’s turn to someone with more knowledge and credibility than you. From Manohla Dargis, one of the NYT film critics, on Stewart’s acting skills:

“Watching Kristen Stewart is always an adventure. A performer who makes good movies better and dreary movies tolerable, she has a restlessness that has made her one of the more interesting attractions in American film. She has a gift for making a character’s inner life transparently readable, and while she can be subtle and withholding, it is her fascinatingly unquiet presence that draws you in, an itchy intensity that can keep her (and you) on edge. Pauline Kael wrote that Jane Fonda’s “motor runs a little fast” — so does Stewart’s.”

You’re joking, right? Speaking of struggling finances, no one is worse off than journalists and newspapers. They have no circulation anymore and tons of competition with bloggers, etc. They’re casualties of the internet, unable to compete with changing times. AI will only make it worse in terms of bogus reviews.

Would I trust a critic in 1980? Sure, of course. But today, if you pay them a little, and I do mean, a little, they’ll publish anything you want them to say.

Kristen Stewart cannot act. I don’t care how much (or rather how little) she or whoever is trying to promote her paid Manhola Dargis to say otherwise. She cannot act!

How many times have you said this already? It''s like a mantra, or dementia.

It’s not a mantra or dementia, it’s a technical FACT.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

I don't understand how anyone could possibly feel this strongly about a woman who has mostly been in indie movies for the last decade. WTF is she doing to you? You seem livid at her very existence. And that, to me, frankly, screams some type of prejudice. A woman who clearly doesn't give a flying eff about what people think about her? A lesbian? A woman who went through a public scandal and had the audacity to not be forced into a basement with a scarlet A? Are you a Robert Pattinson fan? Because honestly the vitriol in this thread for a fairly under the radar actress is baffling. This is too much emotion to have about someone you don't know.

Seems like the appearance of arrogance and the possible self-indulgence on her part, might upset people.

I mean, to me that reads "seems like the fact that she likes herself upsets people". Because all she's really done is walk around new york during a press tour in provocative clothes and continue to act, both of which are things loads of other actors/actresses do without people seeming to like self implode in response.

No, she organized and paid for people to film and distribute a video of her tripping around in stilettos (and even here in DCUM). That’s what’s annoying, not that she walked around or whatever. Lots of actors and actresses live in NYC, no one chases after them unless they are invited and to do so.

What’s infuriating is the pathetic PR and the insulting of our intelligence. Why do people in the business think their audiences are so stupid? Have a little respect for us if you want us to watch your crap.

Are you saying that she asked them to follow her around??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

I don't understand how anyone could possibly feel this strongly about a woman who has mostly been in indie movies for the last decade. WTF is she doing to you? You seem livid at her very existence. And that, to me, frankly, screams some type of prejudice. A woman who clearly doesn't give a flying eff about what people think about her? A lesbian? A woman who went through a public scandal and had the audacity to not be forced into a basement with a scarlet A? Are you a Robert Pattinson fan? Because honestly the vitriol in this thread for a fairly under the radar actress is baffling. This is too much emotion to have about someone you don't know.

Seems like the appearance of arrogance and the possible self-indulgence on her part, might upset people.

I mean, to me that reads "seems like the fact that she likes herself upsets people". Because all she's really done is walk around new york during a press tour in provocative clothes and continue to act, both of which are things loads of other actors/actresses do without people seeming to like self implode in response.

No, she organized and paid for people to film and distribute a video of her tripping around in stilettos (and even here in DCUM). That’s what’s annoying, not that she walked around or whatever. Lots of actors and actresses live in NYC, no one chases after them unless they are invited and to do so.

What’s infuriating is the pathetic PR and the insulting of our intelligence. Why do people in the business think their audiences are so stupid? Have a little respect for us if you want us to watch your crap.

Are you saying that she asked them to follow her around??

Yes. Because she PAID them to be there and record her.

Are you stupid or just pretending to be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

I don't understand how anyone could possibly feel this strongly about a woman who has mostly been in indie movies for the last decade. WTF is she doing to you? You seem livid at her very existence. And that, to me, frankly, screams some type of prejudice. A woman who clearly doesn't give a flying eff about what people think about her? A lesbian? A woman who went through a public scandal and had the audacity to not be forced into a basement with a scarlet A? Are you a Robert Pattinson fan? Because honestly the vitriol in this thread for a fairly under the radar actress is baffling. This is too much emotion to have about someone you don't know.

Seems like the appearance of arrogance and the possible self-indulgence on her part, might upset people.

I mean, to me that reads "seems like the fact that she likes herself upsets people". Because all she's really done is walk around new york during a press tour in provocative clothes and continue to act, both of which are things loads of other actors/actresses do without people seeming to like self implode in response.

No, she organized and paid for people to film and distribute a video of her tripping around in stilettos (and even here in DCUM). That’s what’s annoying, not that she walked around or whatever. Lots of actors and actresses live in NYC, no one chases after them unless they are invited and to do so.

What’s infuriating is the pathetic PR and the insulting of our intelligence. Why do people in the business think their audiences are so stupid? Have a little respect for us if you want us to watch your crap.

Are you saying that she asked them to follow her around??

Yes. Because she PAID them to be there and record her.

Are you stupid or just pretending to be?

I hate to break it to you but KS does not have to pay anyone to follow her around. You clearly hate her, but I strongly dislike Gwyneth Paltrow but have enough of a grasp on reality to understand she's a famous person who makes the photographers who photograph her money not the other way around. KS is kind of notoriously private and only shows up like this when promoting a project. And yes when promoting a project celebrities frequently walk around in large cities in FASHION to be photographed. That is a part of their literal job to be the face of the movie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness?

Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking.

No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity.

She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off.

If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.

NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.

No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film.

Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.

Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films.

First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!!

Let’s turn to someone with more knowledge and credibility than you. From Manohla Dargis, one of the NYT film critics, on Stewart’s acting skills:

“Watching Kristen Stewart is always an adventure. A performer who makes good movies better and dreary movies tolerable, she has a restlessness that has made her one of the more interesting attractions in American film. She has a gift for making a character’s inner life transparently readable, and while she can be subtle and withholding, it is her fascinatingly unquiet presence that draws you in, an itchy intensity that can keep her (and you) on edge. Pauline Kael wrote that Jane Fonda’s “motor runs a little fast” — so does Stewart’s.”

You’re joking, right? Speaking of struggling finances, no one is worse off than journalists and newspapers. They have no circulation anymore and tons of competition with bloggers, etc. They’re casualties of the internet, unable to compete with changing times. AI will only make it worse in terms of bogus reviews.

Would I trust a critic in 1980? Sure, of course. But today, if you pay them a little, and I do mean, a little, they’ll publish anything you want them to say.

Kristen Stewart cannot act. I don’t care how much (or rather how little) she or whoever is trying to promote her paid Manhola Dargis to say otherwise. She cannot act!

You seem like a person who is deeply unhappy with your life. I hope you find peace. In the meantime, Kristen will continue to roll around in her millions and Manohla will continue to have her words read by thousands. And there’s nothing you can do about it, not if you protest until you’re blue in the face and spittle flies from your mouth.

[Anonymous]

This thread is not entertaining, at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this couldn't all be about the fact that she turned to girls after she had RP?

Does this seem likable/approachable to you? :

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4fb0_mtWvW/

I'm not her intended audience. And neither are you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did you see the video of her walking in public in panties and a top?

She’s clearly thirsty for press. When was the last time she worked?

Her haircut is awful, and she’s flat as a pancake.

I don’t get it. She’s not a sex symbol like a kardashian…lacks the beauty and curves.

And she’s not a great actress. She should find some small indie films to make. Maybe she can strike gold with a good script?

Or she should reboot twilight and just accept that she’s a one hit wonder…as long as she has hot guys around her.

I would totally hit it. Kardadhians hard pass. Different Strokes.