| OP, it is almost fall. What did you decide? |
| I would let 17 year old go to Europe or the anglosphere but not Vietnam (might change my answer if they spoke the language or had family etc.). Europe/Canada/Australia/NZ are safer and more culturally/legally/economically similar, so there would less adjustment and less chance for real trouble. Plenty of options and places to see there. |
This is so ignorant and racist. Vietnam is not Thailand and the laws on prostitution are completely different. That said, I would let two boys go after a year of college, but there are so many dangers that they have never been exposed to: scammers abound in those youth hostels. I remember in my 20s traveling alone though SE Asia there were lots of young people probably a decade older than these boys looking to score drugs, party, and scam people out of their money. Not a lot of them. But enough not to trust my 17 year olds not to get into trouble, especially boys. I would also be worried about what would happen if they got hurt or sick. Would they know what to do? The medical system in Vietam is like France's where they go to pharmacists for so many things. Also, the traffic laws, or lack thereof makes getting on a motorbike or even crossing the street a real hazard. Also, there are a lot of scammers on beaches and touristy areas of the bigger cities. Some are very convincing. It's just an intense place, even if you are fluent in the language, which I am. They just don't have the life experiences to handle what could go wrong. I hope if you let them go, I hope it works out. |
Why? WTF? No we don’t do emerging markets without a local or actual adult or a guide. I assume this 17 yo is very mature, logical and street smart? I would never send an immature or adhd or asd or only book smart kid there alone. They’d be an easy and obvious mark. |
| Nope |
So what if they can get visas. that’s beyond moot. Are they smart? Loads of common sense? Well-traveled? Not a sucker? Don’t drink much or at all? Know some martial arts? |
Agree. This is a troll post. And it makes little sense even at that. Lame. |
| I would do a hybrid of this. Mom also goes to Vietnam but stays in a different hotel, does her own trip things but available if needed. |
I tend to agree with this. Pretty sure a lot of people of my parents generation were living fully independently at 17 or 18. It's kind of funny that people are saying no, but then they're sending their kids off to college, where they face many of the same risks – rape, people taking advantage of you, robberies, driving risks. One could argue that going to Vietnam would be safer than going to NYU for example |
| I moved to the US at 18 from Europe. My kids are planning on Europe for college. I don’t know about Vietnam specifically, but if the boys are responsible and not risk takers, I would allow it. |
| No |
In that case I would say yes. |
You should try traveling abroad. And reading the comments before you post. It’s absolutely possible and even at a much younger age in Vietnam, as discussed extensively above. |
Depends on where in Asia. Going to developed market Tokyo with your parents is way different than Vietnam or Cambodia or Phuket with your 17 yo peer. |
| I don't even let my kid go to NYC alone at 18. (Yes, with a friend. But at that age, if an unusual situation arises, kids need a support system. And if they're out late or in an untrafficked area, I want them to be in pairs.) |