Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The sibling needs to reimburse the estate for that amount and then everything is split equally. I would not quit claiming it without them reimbursing me or buying it from the estate.
I opened this thread when it's 8 pages long, and this was the first post after the OP. It's the right answer - perhaps the only right answer.
If the sibling won't go for this, OP, then partition and be damned the consequences.
I think logic doesn't work with OP's sibling and BigLaw BIL. BIL is manipulating the situation to his benefit. I am guessing he blackmailed the parent into paying half and continuing to pay. Parent tried to solve it with the deed, but now BIL is just pulling the same thing on the siblings.
Yeah, after I read the rest of the thread, it's easy to see why the obvious solution hasn't worked.
OP, the last compromise you offered would have cost you and your other siblings tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The House Sibling is definitely greedy, but he is doing this because (i) the longer the estate stays open, the longer the estate is responsible for 50% of the mortgage and other expenses, and (ii) he does not believe you will take steps to enforce a partition. For 7 years, he's been right, and it's apparent that this will continue until you do. So, you have a choice to make: (i) allow this situation to continue indefinitely, (ii) give HS what he wants and be done with him, or (iii) force the executor/estate lawyer to take aggressive steps to close the estate, which means suing for partition. I'd definitely choose the third option, and I'd also do as others suggest and find a new lawyer who experienced in this type of litigation - it's a very niche specialty. I have been a BigLaw litigator for almost 30 years, and I wouldn't handle a case like this - I'd find someone who specializes in it.
Good luck.