
What is the question was -- does it violate your code of conduct to call for the death of every person in Gaza? Or every african american. Or every catholic?
That was the question they messed up -- is it a violation of your code to call for the murder of all jews. Answer has to be yes or if it does not it should. There is not a lot else you can say. |
When people show you who they are, believe them. They condoned the behavior and only retreated after finding out that people that don't live on campus have very different and highly valuable ($$$) opinions. |
Asking if a call for the genocide of Jews is against Penn/Harvard/MIT Code of conduct of harassment and bullying is a pretty simple question. But you hate the messenger, not the message. |
+1 |
Well, this is a perfect example of the double standard. Pro Palestinian protestors can say “There is only one solution” and “From the River to the Sea” and have paragliders and guns on their posters and praise the “heroes” of 10/7, and Jews aren’t allowed to infer that they are anti-Semitic and want to harm Jewish people. However, if anyone points out that Claudine Gay, with her singularly unimpressive history as an academic, her mismanagement of the disciplinary process at the University, as well as her terrible performance as a Congressional witness (and follow-up after), doesn’t seem good at her job other than the fact that she checks several DEI boxes at once, they are a racist. And it would be impossible for “right wing nut jobs…to regulate speech more than” the liberal administrations of these campuses. Among many other things, Harvard Title IX training identifies “sizeism & fat-phobia” & “culture & identity abuse” including “objectifying identity, language, religion, culture, gender expression, etc, or using the wrong pronouns” as violations. (But of course, whether or not it’s ok to endorse the killing of Jewish people depends on the “context.”) ![]() |
I don’t think donors should dictate policy. |
Agree |
Yup, they were clearly coached to equivocate. |
My apologies if you have been in a coma for the last two months, but open a web browser, there are plenty of examples. |
There is a super easy solution, don't accept donor money. |
+1 |
Wonder how the new president will seek out the none israel supporters? First up will be Palestinians, Muslims and blacks. Next bet they go after the Catholics. |
Also agree! |
Are you paying attention? These dipshits in the IDF cannot even use bleeding edge technology gifted by the U.S. to successfully root out Hamas. There’s been a minimum 2:1 ratio of innocent civilian-to-combatant deaths since 10/7, and that’s using the notoriously dishonest IDF as a source. So, no, I don’t find the fact that the racist clowns who identify as Zionists haven’t completed their STATED mission of dispossessing every last indigenous person of their land in the region to be contra-evidence of that mission. They’re just really incompetent, which explains a lot. But incompetence doesn’t absolve them of their sins. |
Yeah, an “2:1 ratio of innocent civilian-to-combatant deaths since 10/7” is what happens when terrorists deliberately and cynically embed themselves in dense civilian centers. You obviously expect Israelis to just quietly accept the occasional massacre with a side helping of rape and torture and kidnapping. I mean, they already get rocket fire on the regular, what’s the big deal? Unless you are willing to accept that happening on American soil, without military response, you are a hypocrite. Hamas started this conflict. They don’t get to dictate Israel’s response to an act of war. Neither do you. |