Sidwell 2023 College outcomes?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sidwell 23 family. Definitely a tough year. Many seniors and families (us included) are starting to grow frustrated with Sidwell's grade deflation and feel like there should be some sort of change going forward to communicate to colleges the rigor of the curriculum and the rarity of "high" GPAs.

To some previous posters: yes, the majority of Ivies this year have been heavy, heavy legacy - think a parent with time on the board, generational legacy, that sort of thing. Yes, UChicago accepted a very very high number of students again this year, but many of those who have been accepted will most likely end up choosing others instead.

Public universities this year were very, very scary for Sidwell students: Wisco was arguably the biggest shocker of the year and rejected/waitlisted deserving students in droves. Much less success at Michigan this year as well.

Sidwell is still just as strong as (if not stronger than) in years past when it comes to highly selective LACS and did well with EDs there.



Dalton kids are much cooler, they are engaged in more interesting activities. Who wants to take a spoiled brat kid who got handed everything from sidwell? If I was an admissions officer Id choose either the cool kids or kids who are unhooked and work their butts off from public and urms.

There are instructors at Sidwell who essentially NEVER give above a B+ on papers. So, students endlessly grind and wear themselves trying to get a decent grade in the class. What is Sidwell doing exactly?


^^ hopefully the administration is finally starting to see the negative effects of this with regards to college admissions


Umm, no they are not. We have two kids at Sidwell -- spaced a number of years apart. Older one graduated and younger DC has some time left. This has been a standard complaint about Sidwell for a while. School simply does not engage. Those interested should look at Dalton outcomes. They used to be just like Sidwell. Now, there is an ocean of a difference between the two schools.


Are there simply more legacy at Dalton?


Or are you saying Dalton has lowered its standards and is no longer “rigorous?”


No, def not saying that. I live in NYC and know a lot of Dalton parents. They all seem hooked.


DD goes to camp with girls who went to Dalton, Spence, Chapin, etc. These schools have wealthier parents than Sidwell hands down. I don’t think it’s just legacy, but probably some major donors.


How have the legacy kids done at Sidwell (non-major donor)?
Dalton is wealthier but not to the extent that large numbers of megadonors are getting their kids into school each year.


???
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It's the same story at STA and NCS this year. Top but unhooked kids were the ones with the most disappointing admissions relative to their stats. Some slipped through and did ok; many did not. It was totally random whereas it used to be a relatively sure thing: if you had "this" high GPA, you could reasonably expect an admission to "this" group of schools. This year totally random for the highest kids.

Not much these schools can do about that except for the grade deflation. I honestly don't know why these schools do this since it only hurts their own students. NCS is also notorious for English classes where out of the entire grade, less than 5 kids will be given an A from the department. Why do this? You have rigorous admissions standards and they you give everyone Bs. It makes no sense.
I'm 100% sure that if these schools would bump all grading up by half a letter grade it would improve admissions. A bump of a full letter grade and they'd knock it out of the park. The kids would still do the same work, score the same on the AP exams and SATs--they would just have competitive GPAs! Amazing.


Yes but you signed up for that
Anonymous
How many Chicago this year?
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: