Elementary Students from Key Taken to Hospital After Eating Edibles at School

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:wow, people like to be apologists! There were public forums on it. It was a significant set of acts of racism that the the principal and AP handled by never reaching out to the kids who were on the receiving side, and on the other side assured the parents of the biggest instigating kid not to worry about it and then allowed that kid to become school president. It took months to deal with. It ended up with the DCPS officials issuing public apologies and statements about the hate incidents... It was significant and tore the community apart for a period of time. It is also likely why Landeryou will never leave - after what went down he'll never get another job in today's environments.


I never liked the "allowed that kid to become school president" line of attack. He was elected by his classmates. Are you staying that student council elections ought to be rigged?


OMG - are you for real? For kids who have not met the criteria - including regularly and aggressively calling kids racial slurs, segregating games at recess, engaging in fights - it's the administration's job to apply the required disciplinary actions to not allow kids to participate in student LEADERSHIP (or even other actions).


If they have criteria, that's fine. But they didn't. You're saying school leadership should say, "OMG, THAT kid might get elected student council president, we'd better rig the election"?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:wow, people like to be apologists! There were public forums on it. It was a significant set of acts of racism that the the principal and AP handled by never reaching out to the kids who were on the receiving side, and on the other side assured the parents of the biggest instigating kid not to worry about it and then allowed that kid to become school president. It took months to deal with. It ended up with the DCPS officials issuing public apologies and statements about the hate incidents... It was significant and tore the community apart for a period of time. It is also likely why Landeryou will never leave - after what went down he'll never get another job in today's environments.


I never liked the "allowed that kid to become school president" line of attack. He was elected by his classmates. Are you staying that student council elections ought to be rigged?


OMG - are you for real? For kids who have not met the criteria - including regularly and aggressively calling kids racial slurs, segregating games at recess, engaging in fights - it's the administration's job to apply the required disciplinary actions to not allow kids to participate in student LEADERSHIP (or even other actions).


If they have criteria, that's fine. But they didn't. You're saying school leadership should say, "OMG, THAT kid might get elected student council president, we'd better rig the election"?


They did and do have criteria. And they have a legal requirement to follow against discrimination and racism - and to take disciplinary action or intervention to protect kids who have been harmed - including not allowing someone who committed a hate crime to be able to run for and win the school presidency. They are required to be in loco partenis. These are 10 year olds. This is not like adults and dominion and Trump. The administration were beyond negligent in their responsibilities.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:wow, people like to be apologists! There were public forums on it. It was a significant set of acts of racism that the the principal and AP handled by never reaching out to the kids who were on the receiving side, and on the other side assured the parents of the biggest instigating kid not to worry about it and then allowed that kid to become school president. It took months to deal with. It ended up with the DCPS officials issuing public apologies and statements about the hate incidents... It was significant and tore the community apart for a period of time. It is also likely why Landeryou will never leave - after what went down he'll never get another job in today's environments.


I never liked the "allowed that kid to become school president" line of attack. He was elected by his classmates. Are you staying that student council elections ought to be rigged?


OMG - are you for real? For kids who have not met the criteria - including regularly and aggressively calling kids racial slurs, segregating games at recess, engaging in fights - it's the administration's job to apply the required disciplinary actions to not allow kids to participate in student LEADERSHIP (or even other actions).


If they have criteria, that's fine. But they didn't. You're saying school leadership should say, "OMG, THAT kid might get elected student council president, we'd better rig the election"?


They did and do have criteria. And they have a legal requirement to follow against discrimination and racism - and to take disciplinary action or intervention to protect kids who have been harmed - including not allowing someone who committed a hate crime to be able to run for and win the school presidency. They are required to be in loco partenis. These are 10 year olds. This is not like adults and dominion and Trump. The administration were beyond negligent in their responsibilities.


There was no hate crime. Come on.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: