Marjorie Taylor Greene… Is an idiot!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

That obviously shows that the GOP has absolutely NO principles left. Not even an illusion of any.

+1 Ladies and gentlemen, behold the member of House Homeland Security Committee who doesn’t think a plane hit the Pentagon.

She is a goddamn disgrace. I think maybe on one of the first meetings of the Homeland Security Committee, they should wait til she gets in, clear the room, lock the doors, then pull out all of the files and documents and photos and data, and spend the next 8 hours educating this complete moron on the TRUTH regarding all of the idiotic batshit conspiracy theories she spouts.

Sorry, the disgrace is any GOP politician (or supporter really) who doesn’t full throatedly rebuke the current GOP. There have always been crazies. It’s what those in power do with them.

Let’s see all the Jan 6th footage please

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

Evidence of Jewish Space Lasers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

They have no credibility. Their whole careers are based on delusions and paranoia and bigotry. Only their fellow cult members will believe anything they say.

[Anonymous]

MTG in the house!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

That obviously shows that the GOP has absolutely NO principles left. Not even an illusion of any.

+1 Ladies and gentlemen, behold the member of House Homeland Security Committee who doesn’t think a plane hit the Pentagon.

She is a goddamn disgrace. I think maybe on one of the first meetings of the Homeland Security Committee, they should wait til she gets in, clear the room, lock the doors, then pull out all of the files and documents and photos and data, and spend the next 8 hours educating this complete moron on the TRUTH regarding all of the idiotic batshit conspiracy theories she spouts.

Sorry, the disgrace is any GOP politician (or supporter really) who doesn’t full throatedly rebuke the current GOP. There have always been crazies. It’s what those in power do with them.

Let’s see all the Jan 6th footage please

Everyone who says this hasn’t even watched what has been released.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

Maybe it will be evidence of a congressman who was elected on a fraudulent resume and who stole money from a go-fund-me for a dying service dog who belonged to a disabled veteran?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

I hope they investigate why the dinosaurs died. The astroid hitting the Yucatán is bs.

[Anonymous]

I heard there is a lot of talk about investigating this stuff about the earth going around the sun. Doing my own research it is obvious the sun goes around the earth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

Evidence of Jewish Space Lasers?

I think it will have more to do with what Twitter has been revealing, with 50k rent payments, etc. But I’m sure Dems are not even concerned about 50K rent payments per month on a 500K home. Totes normal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.

[Anonymous]

Oh, and I’d like to see footage from the second camera which had a great view of the J6 bomber.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.

Something that an attorney can take to a court without facing sanctions. We've yet to see even that minuscule bar passed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are we not going to talk about how utterly bizarre and inappropriate it is that McCarty is putting Marjorie Taylor Greene on the Homeland Security Committee?

Remember, she is a ringleader of the Insurrection Caucus. She actually said that if she had been the leader of the J6 attack on the Capitol, it "would have been armed" and that she "would have won."

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-armed-jan6-capitol-riot-insurrection-1766266

Greene is exactly the kind of extremist that the Homeland Security Committee should be investigating. Why is she there? To warn her extremist friends if investigators are on to them? To obstruct? To weaken federal response to a future attack?

I think we all need some answers from Republicans on this.

This was obviously one of the concessions he agreed to in order to secure his position.

+1 That’s the answer from Republicans you’re going to get.

I’m a Republican and can’t WAIT to see what she and the others turn up

What are you people going to do with yourselves now that they have the power to investigate whatever they want, yet STILL won't be able to prove "the election was stolen" or "Epps is a fed who masterminded J6" or any of the rest?

What is proof in the eyes of a leftist? What I’d like to see is information being hidden from the American people, such as more J6 tapes for starters.

Something that an attorney can take to a court without facing sanctions. We've yet to see even that minuscule bar passed

We are seeing it in AZ right now, despite leftist judges. It doesn’t take a judge to release J6 tapes. It doesn’t take a judge to release the second camera footage of the J6 bomber. If someone trying to prevent the release of those in a court of law, they have something to hide.