AI generated pecking orders

[Anonymous]

Has anyone run into these yet. A situation where a supervisor is using AI to generate pecking orders has cropped up at my work. AI is surprisingly bringing out some unsavory colors in my current supervisor. Has anyone else found AI to be destabilizing at your office? Like for me personally productivity increases have been massive. I received numerous awards and completed several high profile projects automating several error prone and time consuming tasks reducing back logs. Just the previous metrics we used to measure productivity and measure accomplishments aren't adequate, but the goal posts are moving.

[Anonymous]

No.

[Anonymous]

I don't think I understand what you mean by pecking order. Aside from that, it wouldn't surprise me that if you can do things faster with the AI, the boss would expect you to be even more productive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't think I understand what you mean by pecking order. Aside from that, it wouldn't surprise me that if you can do things faster with the AI, the boss would expect you to be even more productive.

Funny little conversation I just had with an LLM. Turns out they are bad at turns of phrases. I used pecking order as in an "order that pecks" or the literal aggressive order with no other utility meant to establish a hierarchy. Whereas the LLM insists that a pecking order is a hierarchical system. It really didn't like this linguistic usage of a phrase in an unexpected context. I'm guessing some people would take issue with non-conventional uses of idioms, especially those that high light weakness in society. Apologies for any misunderstanding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think I understand what you mean by pecking order. Aside from that, it wouldn't surprise me that if you can do things faster with the AI, the boss would expect you to be even more productive.

Funny little conversation I just had with an LLM. Turns out they are bad at turns of phrases. I used pecking order as in an "order that pecks" or the literal aggressive order with no other utility meant to establish a hierarchy. Whereas the LLM insists that a pecking order is a hierarchical system. It really didn't like this linguistic usage of a phrase in an unexpected context. I'm guessing some people would take issue with non-conventional uses of idioms, especially those that high light weakness in society. Apologies for any misunderstanding.

I’m very confused. I think the LLM is using correctly but not sure you are. And if your posts are generated with AI then you need to work on your prompting because the original post and your post above are difficult to understand.

[Anonymous]

I have no idea what OP is asking.

[Anonymous]

I have no idea what any of this means. Did AI ask the question?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think I understand what you mean by pecking order. Aside from that, it wouldn't surprise me that if you can do things faster with the AI, the boss would expect you to be even more productive.

Funny little conversation I just had with an LLM. Turns out they are bad at turns of phrases. I used pecking order as in an "order that pecks" or the literal aggressive order with no other utility meant to establish a hierarchy. Whereas the LLM insists that a pecking order is a hierarchical system. It really didn't like this linguistic usage of a phrase in an unexpected context. I'm guessing some people would take issue with non-conventional uses of idioms, especially those that high light weakness in society. Apologies for any misunderstanding.

You can’t have a conversation with an LLM. It has no mind, so it can’t communicate. What you mean is, the random string of characters the LLM generated when you input a text string matched a description of what the phrase “pecking order” means.

[Anonymous]

Do you work in a chicken factory OP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think I understand what you mean by pecking order. Aside from that, it wouldn't surprise me that if you can do things faster with the AI, the boss would expect you to be even more productive.

Funny little conversation I just had with an LLM. Turns out they are bad at turns of phrases. I used pecking order as in an "order that pecks" or the literal aggressive order with no other utility meant to establish a hierarchy. Whereas the LLM insists that a pecking order is a hierarchical system. It really didn't like this linguistic usage of a phrase in an unexpected context. I'm guessing some people would take issue with non-conventional uses of idioms, especially those that high light weakness in society. Apologies for any misunderstanding.

You can’t have a conversation with an LLM. It has no mind, so it can’t communicate. What you mean is, the random string of characters the LLM generated when you input a text string matched a description of what the phrase “pecking order” means.

Lol, this reminded me of Ed Zitron who I learned about from DCUM.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/i-will-never-respect-a-website/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you work in a chicken factory OP?

Chicken powered AI factory. Chickens with AI.

[Anonymous]

OP if you're being managed out of the office it's not because of your productivity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OP if you're being managed out of the office it's not because of your productivity.

Bock, bock, ba bock what?

[Anonymous]

Absolutely, yes. It's only with some personalities that are easy to influence. I own a business and work with a lot of other businesses. I'd say about 5% of business owners trust AI more than their people or experts they hire (like me). It's awful when that happens. Like Randy in Southpark.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Absolutely, yes. It's only with some personalities that are easy to influence. I own a business and work with a lot of other businesses. I'd say about 5% of business owners trust AI more than their people or experts they hire (like me). It's awful when that happens. Like Randy in Southpark.

Yeah, I can see it going that route with my boss (What would Claude say? Claude said this.)

It's ironic in some cases I think my supervisor sort of realized he made some mistakes through Claude, like he didn't even realize he was the problem before, when he started quoting Claude. It's like "Oh you can do that, I didn't think people could do that." "Yeah, it isn't as hard as I thought with Claude." Sigh, at least we have Claude now. He doesn't seem to realize that to the degree he had simplified things for naive team members (and himself).

The thing is he doesn't seem to realize; I don't need him to run the prompt. I recall back in the day, "Have you googled..., devolved into. You haven't googled it yet." No, your half AI slop with half the context that I can see clearly was misguided isn't helping, don't you have something better to be doing? I can run the prompts better because I have more details about the issue right now. But somehow, he feels very strongly about that prompt he ran. "But, that was my prompt.", yeah, but anyone can run that prompt.