Sidwell or NCS for middle school?

[Anonymous]

Similar to a previous post, wondering about Sidwell or NCS for middle school. What can people with kids at either school share about Sidwell versus NCS for a kid entering in middle school?

[Anonymous]

Both rigorous with smart kids. One is obviously single sex while the other is coed. One Episcopal while the other Quaker. Can go wrong with either on academics. Community feel a bit different. NCS being a little more conservative community. Sidwell student body is more diverse and more international.

[Anonymous]

Sidwell by a country mile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell by a country mile.

Can you share more about your reasoning?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Both rigorous with smart kids. One is obviously single sex while the other is coed. One Episcopal while the other Quaker. Can go wrong with either on academics. Community feel a bit different. NCS being a little more conservative community. Sidwell student body is more diverse and more international.

sidwell sounds so much better.

[Anonymous]

Sidwell 100%. A lot of my friends had kids who tried to transfer out of NCS/STA to join Sidwell and were unsuccessful. I assume the opposite is easier.

Sidwell's middle school is fantastic. The campus and MS building are beautiful, the community is warm and nurturing, and the rigorous academics prepare the kids extremely well for upper school. Reading ability is heavily emphasized, and accelerated math courses are rigorous and great. My DC told me that it didn't feel cliquey, and the kids who had been there since lower school were welcoming. There was also a considerably large entering class, which made it easy to make friends and hit the ground running on day 1. I have also found the parent community here to be very down-to-earth, kind, friendly, and involved with the school. The generalizations that Sidwell families are snobby/stuck-up are untrue. I can't speak for NCS, but I haven't heard amazing things across the board.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sidwell 100%. A lot of my friends had kids who tried to transfer out of NCS/STA to join Sidwell and were unsuccessful. I assume the opposite is easier.

Sidwell's middle school is fantastic. The campus and MS building are beautiful, the community is warm and nurturing, and the rigorous academics prepare the kids extremely well for upper school. Reading ability is heavily emphasized, and accelerated math courses are rigorous and great. My DC told me that it didn't feel cliquey, and the kids who had been there since lower school were welcoming. There was also a considerably large entering class, which made it easy to make friends and hit the ground running on day 1. I have also found the parent community here to be very down-to-earth, kind, friendly, and involved with the school. The generalizations that Sidwell families are snobby/stuck-up are untrue. I can't speak for NCS, but I haven't heard amazing things across the board.

LOL!

[Anonymous]

The only significant difference is co-ed vs. single sex. Otherwise, it’s the same admin, faculty, students and parents.

Does your daughter want all-girls?

[Anonymous]

A quick read of recent posts of the pressure cooker vibe that NCS has with current students (and echoed by alumni and parents of current NCS US girls) would give me great pause about sending my MS daughter there.

[Anonymous]

I would echo what a previous poster said. Does your child want an all-girls school? If so, I think it is a great environment for girls to grow and gain confidence.

I would say that the parent community is welcoming at NCS. While people keep commenting that people are snobby, my observation is that a lot of the parent community is more introverted, nerdy and at times socially awkward.

[Anonymous]

I've taught at both schools and have friends who still teach there, a few who have also jumped between schools. Academics at both schools are on par with each other. They're essentially the same kind of school, except the differences people have already mentioned (e.g., coed v. single sex, Quaker v. Episcopalian). Students are mostly from upper-middle/wealthy families who live in upper NW, Bethesda/CC, Potomac, McLean, Arlington/Alexandria. Tons of parents from big law, doctors, lobbyists, business owners/CEOS/CFOs, and some high-level feds and academics. Throw in a politico or two and there you have it. Some racial diversity in each school, though not much socioeconomic diversity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've taught at both schools and have friends who still teach there, a few who have also jumped between schools. Academics at both schools are on par with each other. They're essentially the same kind of school, except the differences people have already mentioned (e.g., coed v. single sex, Quaker v. Episcopalian). Students are mostly from upper-middle/wealthy families who live in upper NW, Bethesda/CC, Potomac, McLean, Arlington/Alexandria. Tons of parents from big law, doctors, lobbyists, business owners/CEOS/CFOs, and some high-level feds and academics. Throw in a politico or two and there you have it. Some racial diversity in each school, though not much socioeconomic diversity.

There you have it! If you are thinking about next year, consider applying to both. Both are hard to get into, so you may find that your choice will be made for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I've taught at both schools and have friends who still teach there, a few who have also jumped between schools. Academics at both schools are on par with each other. They're essentially the same kind of school, except the differences people have already mentioned (e.g., coed v. single sex, Quaker v. Episcopalian). Students are mostly from upper-middle/wealthy families who live in upper NW, Bethesda/CC, Potomac, McLean, Arlington/Alexandria. Tons of parents from big law, doctors, lobbyists, business owners/CEOS/CFOs, and some high-level feds and academics. Throw in a politico or two and there you have it. Some racial diversity in each school, though not much socioeconomic diversity.

THIS!!! 100% agree!