Epstein Files

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When I was 14, we partied at the house of a senior boy because his parents were there and allowed it. They got drunk with us. Are you pedo cheerleaders saying these parents shouldn’t have been held accountable? We all knew we were too young to drink. What if they just said we looked 21? Where were our parents, you ask? They were at home, thinking we were at a friend’s house or at the movies. Were you people not ever teenagers sneaking around and making poor decisions?

Sure but I never went to a private island on a leer jet belonging to a 50 year old man. Out of the supposed 1000s of girls, not one parent inquired about this? No one said hey, wait, what? You are going away for a few days?! All these parents were gullible fools?


Why would these monsters target girls with involved responsible parents? It would be the opposite.

I am curious how they identified teens with irresponsible parents just by looking at them. This was even prior to social media, so it was purely based on how the girls looked? This is so bizarre.


Wow, there is really no length that you won’t go to somehow blame someone else. Congratulations?

It’s really weird, but whatever, that’s why it’s anonymous here. I’d hope that you’d never express this out loud in real life.

Why!? What is wrong with my opinion? I would and have expressed this irl. You don’t find this bizarre and unbelievable? Something stinks here. I think some parents must have been complicit, I cannot believe thousands of teens fell for this.


Blaming rape victims is wrong. Blaming child rape victims also wrong. Even if your fantasy is correct and the parents are complicit, it excuses zero of the men and women involved and the rape and trafficking.


This. What is wrong with the people who are trying to blame everyone but grown adults who raped and trafficked these girls. Full stop. And yes any adult who knew and didn't say anything will rot in hell too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Here is a list of women moderates by Donald Trump. So many that it had to be categorized.

https://open.substack.com/pub/decodingfoxnews/p/a-comprehensive-list-of-every-woman?r=1nd17&utm_medium=ios


I just read the list. Disgusting pervert with a clear pattern. I am sure Ivanka should be on that list.
Anonymous
I don’t think too many people would mistake that female posing with Prince Andrew for a woman. She was clearly a teen. They didn’t pick girls who were built like they were 25 years old.
Anonymous
Come on down MAGA where are you.
Explain why you still support child abuse.

Come on explain why you are ok with Trump not releasing these files?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think they ran in the same social circles, but it seems like once Trump realized he was a pedo in the business of blackmailing other pedos he distanced himself. It would help restore trust in the federal government if they did release an unredacted version of Epstein/Epstein Island. Hell, I’m not so sure the dude is even dead.


I can't stand Trump, but he was no protector of Epstein. Trump was immediately available to talk for hours about Epstein to a reporter (? Memory is fuzzy...maybe a prosecutor?)...which was one of the first steps toward Epstein's downfall.


Utter BS BS BS BS BS

If Trump isn't in those files, he would have released them.

How stupid are you?


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This tweet clip is the front page of Drudge right now.


Well damn, I didn’t see that coming. Not from him. Will Laura Ingram be next.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:When I was 14, we partied at the house of a senior boy because his parents were there and allowed it. They got drunk with us. Are you pedo cheerleaders saying these parents shouldn’t have been held accountable? We all knew we were too young to drink. What if they just said we looked 21? Where were our parents, you ask? They were at home, thinking we were at a friend’s house or at the movies. Were you people not ever teenagers sneaking around and making poor decisions?

Sure but I never went to a private island on a leer jet belonging to a 50 year old man. Out of the supposed 1000s of girls, not one parent inquired about this? No one said hey, wait, what? You are going away for a few days?! All these parents were gullible fools?


Why would these monsters target girls with involved responsible parents? It would be the opposite.

I am curious how they identified teens with irresponsible parents just by looking at them. This was even prior to social media, so it was purely based on how the girls looked? This is so bizarre.


Wow, there is really no length that you won’t go to somehow blame someone else. Congratulations?

It’s really weird, but whatever, that’s why it’s anonymous here. I’d hope that you’d never express this out loud in real life.

Why!? What is wrong with my opinion? I would and have expressed this irl. You don’t find this bizarre and unbelievable? Something stinks here. I think some parents must have been complicit, I cannot believe thousands of teens fell for this.


NP, so I have several thoughts:

First, I appreciate the thankless work of the commenter/s who have been tirelessly pushing back against the r*pe apologists and/or political hacks who keep flooding the thread. It’s exhausting but important to openly push back against those types of messages every. single. time.

Second, on this comment, I assume some of the parents did know and failed to protect their kids. Look at the Michael Jackson stories, with the parents dropping their kids off for sleepovers. It doesn’t excuse the crimes or those who committed and enabled those crimes, but it’s still an interesting situation to try to understand. How could parents possibly be that blind or that greedy, to simply offer up the children they were supposed to protect?

Finally, those types of questions and have gotten me curious about learning more of the factual background here, but I’m having trouble finding a deep dive. People have mentioned Julie K Brown, but the Miami Herald has a paywall and I’m not sure I’m quite interested enough to read her whole book. Can anyone point to a good source for the whole story?

There are older threads here with lots of links.
Big thread when Miami Herald story broke: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/768342.page
Short thread when Dershowitz was fingered with lots of links:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/798904.page
Thread after Epstein’s arrest covering that and the subsequent developments: https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/816762.page
Thread from a year ago similar to this one:
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1188622.page

Vicky Ward on how she tried to get this story out in 2003 but her editor Graydon Carter shut it down:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epsteins-sick-story-played-out-for-years-in-plain-sight/?via=twitter_page

Also Julie Brown has been on a ton of podcasts this week including The Atlantic today. The biggest question she wants answered is who in the Bush DOJ originally said we need to treat this guy with kid gloves. Tina Brown on the Daily Beast podcast today also goes back to the beginning - she was editing either Vanity Fair or the New Yorker when Conchita Sarnoff first published a whole series of articles about him, she eventually wrote a book called TrafficKing.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This tweet clip is the front page of Drudge right now.


Well damn, I didn’t see that coming. Not from him. Will Laura Ingram be next.


Will these people ask themselves how they got scammed so easily?
Anonymous
Trump fires Comey, the prosecutor but he's not guilty LOL

Nothing in those files about Trump but he's spewing 24 hours a day.

Nothing in those files about Trump yet, Republicans are now refusing to have Rules even MEET to avoid having to block the files YET AGAIN. What are they hiding?

If only Dems are in the files, why are Repukes so bent out of shape to not release them?

If only Dems are in the files, this should be a no-brainer?

Come on down MAGA/ Repukes can not have it both ways. If he has nothing to hide the files need to be released otherwise, he is guilty of raping little girls. Not complicated for anyone with brain cells.

Bottom line nothing to hide release the files.
Anonymous

Anonymous
“He’s in the files. A lot of people are in the files,” Mick Mulvaney said in a forthcoming interview with Al Jazeera, a clip of which was teased online.
- former Trump CoS Mick Mulvaney

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Here is a list of women moderates by Donald Trump. So many that it had to be categorized.

https://open.substack.com/pub/decodingfoxnews/p/a-comprehensive-list-of-every-woman?r=1nd17&utm_medium=ios


I just read the list. Disgusting pervert with a clear pattern. I am sure Ivanka should be on that list.


Wow. That does appear credible.
Anonymous
So now that we have health news about the president, we can all forget about this Epstein stuff.

Right? Right?

Anonymous
“I've handed the Trump administration a ready-made Epstein case involving a billionaire financier and Wall Street banks, and they have done nothing with it."
- Sen. Ron Wyden
https://www.allrisenews.com/p/wyden-trump-epstein-banks
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So now that we have health news about the president, we can all forget about this Epstein stuff.

Right? Right?



They're desperate. The people who feel sympathy are not the people who are interested in Epstein.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: