Third round options on Woodward Boundary study

Anonymous
Sounds like the district will share new maps in early December, with new engagement sessions (virtual and in person). So, an added step to the previously communicated process. Any insights into what we expect to see?
Anonymous
Well, the did JUST distribute an email mentioning, "Board Puts Equity and Access First in Boundary Study and Program Analysis Update." So I'm guessing we're back to Round 1, Option 4.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the district will share new maps in early December, with new engagement sessions (virtual and in person). So, an added step to the previously communicated process. Any insights into what we expect to see?


I think these new options will mainly be to show the potential options if SSIMS were approved to become a holding school, how its students could be divided up between Sligo and Eastern.
Anonymous
I hope so! The drama of Option 4 was seriously exhausting
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Well, the did JUST distribute an email mentioning, "Board Puts Equity and Access First in Boundary Study and Program Analysis Update." So I'm guessing we're back to Round 1, Option 4.


That doesn't mean anything. Anytime the BOE or MCPS use the word equity just replace it with a blank space to translate what they actually mean when they use that word.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Well, the did JUST distribute an email mentioning, "Board Puts Equity and Access First in Boundary Study and Program Analysis Update." So I'm guessing we're back to Round 1, Option 4.


That doesn't mean anything. Anytime the BOE or MCPS use the word equity just replace it with a blank space to translate what they actually mean when they use that word.


THIS ^^^^^^
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like the district will share new maps in early December, with new engagement sessions (virtual and in person). So, an added step to the previously communicated process. Any insights into what we expect to see?


I think these new options will mainly be to show the potential options if SSIMS were approved to become a holding school, how its students could be divided up between Sligo and Eastern.


That's what they've said -- additional option will just be accounting for this. It would only be some vague divergence from the second round options.
Anonymous
PP, thank you. Can you just share the source for this?
Anonymous
These will be the leaders. If your neighborhood is zoned to something that makes you unhappy with, quickly get in your private school applications. Expect to be unhappy bc the equity train trumps all other concerns.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:These will be the leaders. If your neighborhood is zoned to something that makes you unhappy with, quickly get in your private school applications. Expect to be unhappy bc the equity train trumps all other concerns.


That was only true in one of the first round options. The round two options didn't emphasize equity at all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:These will be the leaders. If your neighborhood is zoned to something that makes you unhappy with, quickly get in your private school applications. Expect to be unhappy bc the equity train trumps all other concerns.


What specifically do you mean by "equity" here? What do you think MCPS is doing to promote equity?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:These will be the leaders. If your neighborhood is zoned to something that makes you unhappy with, quickly get in your private school applications. Expect to be unhappy bc the equity train trumps all other concerns.


What specifically do you mean by "equity" here? What do you think MCPS is doing to promote equity?


Compare A, B, C and D borders for Woodward and WJ and it will be crystal clear for you.

When new option(s) come out next week, it will be closest to the most “equitable” of those 4.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:These will be the leaders. If your neighborhood is zoned to something that makes you unhappy with, quickly get in your private school applications. Expect to be unhappy bc the equity train trumps all other concerns.


What specifically do you mean by "equity" here? What do you think MCPS is doing to promote equity?


Compare A, B, C and D borders for Woodward and WJ and it will be crystal clear for you.

When new option(s) come out next week, it will be closest to the most “equitable” of those 4.


Option D
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:These will be the leaders. If your neighborhood is zoned to something that makes you unhappy with, quickly get in your private school applications. Expect to be unhappy bc the equity train trumps all other concerns.


What specifically do you mean by "equity" here? What do you think MCPS is doing to promote equity?


Compare A, B, C and D borders for Woodward and WJ and it will be crystal clear for you.

When new option(s) come out next week, it will be closest to the most “equitable” of those 4.


Why do you put "equitable" in quotes? What does "equity" mean to you and what are the competing priorities?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:These will be the leaders. If your neighborhood is zoned to something that makes you unhappy with, quickly get in your private school applications. Expect to be unhappy bc the equity train trumps all other concerns.


What specifically do you mean by "equity" here? What do you think MCPS is doing to promote equity?


Compare A, B, C and D borders for Woodward and WJ and it will be crystal clear for you.

When new option(s) come out next week, it will be closest to the most “equitable” of those 4.


Why do you put "equitable" in quotes? What does "equity" mean to you and what are the competing priorities?



Ask the govt to tell you since you’re having difficulty comprehending.

As the meme goes ::insert Dr Evil air quote gif::
post reply Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Message Quick Reply
Go to: