This is why AI can't take over yet

[Anonymous]

The AI search results I see are full of errors and contradictions. Here's the latest, emphasis added:

"If you are unsure about any part of this process, have an unqualified electrician perform the work."

How long will it be until these kinds of results are no longer common?

[Anonymous]

Here's where I'm at: AI isn't "Intelligence" at all. It's a Large Language Model. What does that mean? It means it's read a gazillion things in English and has learned English really well and so can "predict" what an English speaker would say. It's not actually intelligent.

[Anonymous]

You are just looking at one part of what you think is "A.I." and it is very restricted and biased and limited by the corporations.

Same as the "internet" or clear-web non-deep web, it's only 1% of the total internet.

And corporations like Google, Bing, Yahoo, etc. restrict like 99.99% of that measley 1% of the clear web.

[Anonymous]

AI is just Wikipedia on steroids. It's only as good as the information submitted. I still cannot believe people are using it for substantive research and information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are just looking at one part of what you think is "A.I." and it is very restricted and biased and limited by the corporations.

Same as the "internet" or clear-web non-deep web, it's only 1% of the total internet.

And corporations like Google, Bing, Yahoo, etc. restrict like 99.99% of that measley 1% of the clear web.

That may be true, but it doesn't change that this is a ridiculous result to an electrical question, and I've seen many more wrong "facts" come up in other searches. Also Google, Bing, and Yahoo and similar are what regular people have available to search on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are just looking at one part of what you think is "A.I." and it is very restricted and biased and limited by the corporations.

Same as the "internet" or clear-web non-deep web, it's only 1% of the total internet.

And corporations like Google, Bing, Yahoo, etc. restrict like 99.99% of that measley 1% of the clear web.

That may be true, but it doesn't change that this is a ridiculous result to an electrical question, and I've seen many more wrong "facts" come up in other searches. Also Google, Bing, and Yahoo and similar are what regular people have available to search on.

Which is why it's all so unreliable and tiresome.
You have to learn to beat the system just to get decent information in the last few years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The AI search results I see are full of errors and contradictions. Here's the latest, emphasis added:

"If you are unsure about any part of this process, have an unqualified electrician perform the work."

How long will it be until these kinds of results are no longer common?

What was your search query?

[Anonymous]

AI is a lot like people: some versions are smarter than others. The one you get for free are running in a very low thinking-power mode.

A big question is, how much will it actually cost to use the versions that generate good results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's where I'm at: AI isn't "Intelligence" at all. It's a Large Language Model. What does that mean? It means it's read a gazillion things in English and has learned English really well and so can "predict" what an English speaker would say. It's not actually intelligent.

But to be honest there are many people like that, who mostly just repeat words they've heard other people say, but couldn't explain things much deeper.

The advantage of LLM is the breadth of topics it can repeat other people's words on. Certainty it has brain parts, but usually it's a lot easier to fix an almost correct answer than do the literature search yourself.

When that goes wrong is when correcting what is wrong ISN'T easier than doing the research yourself. Think about that when you're thinking about which jobs will be replaced by AI.

[Anonymous]

*farts

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:AI is just Wikipedia on steroids. It's only as good as the information submitted. .

Will it constantly beg for money like Wikipedia does?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI is just Wikipedia on steroids. It's only as good as the information submitted. .

Will it constantly beg for money like Wikipedia does?

Will probably send out drones to collect money or ensure payments for use.

[Anonymous]

That Musk says no jobs in 10-20 years because of AI and robotics. Stick to your hobbies or find one.