|
DS did fine freshman year but grades improved markedly sophomore and junior year, like a maturity switch went off.
Grades freshman year weren't horrible, mainly B+, but just different from subsequent years. |
|
A positive trajectory is good. Also, some schools do not consider freshman year grades. Emory is one example
|
| Stanford and the University of California schools do not consider grades from freshmen year. |
Not true, for both schools. They discount the grades, but they are certainly "considered". |
True, while of the 13 UC factors in admission is the UC GPA which is 10th and 11th years, they look at the whole transcript. |
|
1. I dont think they're that important.
2. GPA is important and 99.9% won't be recalculating GPA without 9th grade (ie UC). And 9th grade sinks a lot of GPAs, unfortunately 3. if in this situation, ONLY saving grace is swift and sustained uptrend. |
| If positive trend. It’s good my dc has B+ in 9th grade and straight A afterwards and got into an ivy and all public’s so it’s helps to have a positive trend. |
UC schools definitely count first year grades for OOS, which is just about everyone here. |
Is this written somewhere? I have never seen this policy. I am a grad (was in state at the time) and my older had acceptances and I have a high school senior now applying. They are pretty transparent about requirements, just surprised I have never seen this. |
| Ask the specific school to whichbyourbkidbisbappkuing. Each college weights factors differently. A blanketed generalization is not accurate. |
| I think this is really common for 14-15 yo boys who lag girls in maturity and executive functioning. |
| If you can’t have straight A’s starting freshman year, the next best thing is to show improvement year over year. Those grades are fine. |
How are 1 and 2 not saying the opposite things? |
| They 100% matter. When they apply to college, their GPA will be calculated from 9-11th grades. |