Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Something very fishy is going on with that IEWU sub. The main mod was extremely pro-Justin but decided to hand it over to someone who is pro-Blake but still apparently somewhat neutral. I'm beginning to think they bought the sub from her.

Except there are multiple new mods and the most vocal one (the one responding to criticism in comments) is pro-JB.

I think what actually happened is that sub is just exhausting to moderate and the previous mod has to bow out quickly so the new mods have not had time to organize (especially since there are at least two from different sides and the are actively recruiting more). Also this happened at a bad time, right after Justin's claims were dismissed, because there is a lot of discord right now with Lively people feeling emboldened by the decision and some Justin people grasping at conspiracy theories to explain.

I think the mess is organic, to borrow a term.

[Anonymous]

I have seen speculation that the pro-Baldoni mod who left had been getting paid to post and didn’t want their identity uncovered, but I think that’s a conspiracy theory.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something very fishy is going on with that IEWU sub. The main mod was extremely pro-Justin but decided to hand it over to someone who is pro-Blake but still apparently somewhat neutral. I'm beginning to think they bought the sub from her.

Except there are multiple new mods and the most vocal one (the one responding to criticism in comments) is pro-JB.

The majority the last time I checked were all pro-BL, and the main mod themselves is pro-BL. And the only reason the pro-JB one is the most vocal is not because they have the most power, but because all the pro-BL mods are cowards, since they know they're going to have to deal with a large number of pro-JB posters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have seen speculation that the pro-Baldoni mod who left had been getting paid to post and didn’t want their identity uncovered, but I think that’s a conspiracy theory.

lol stop spreading your pro-BL propaganda. The rumor is that pro-BL people paid off a pro-JB poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something very fishy is going on with that IEWU sub. The main mod was extremely pro-Justin but decided to hand it over to someone who is pro-Blake but still apparently somewhat neutral. I'm beginning to think they bought the sub from her.

Except there are multiple new mods and the most vocal one (the one responding to criticism in comments) is pro-JB.

The majority the last time I checked were all pro-BL, and the main mod themselves is pro-BL. And the only reason the pro-JB one is the most vocal is not because they have the most power, but because all the pro-BL mods are cowards, since they know they're going to have to deal with a large number of pro-JB posters.

This is directly contradictory because you say they are all pro-BL but then say the pro-JB mod (who apparently doesn't exist) is vocal. Obviously there is a pro-JB mod because that person is being vocal in the comments.

I think the issue is that some pro-JB people don't want the neutral sub to be neutral. They want it to be pro-JB while also claiming it's neutral because then they can say "look, even the neutral sub is pro-JB" as evidence of his support. But when pro-BL people, who exist, post there, the JB people aggressively downvote them, argue with them, make fun of them.

The ruling on Justin's claims made the pro-BL group bolder and more willing to put up with those behaviors, so more of them are posting in the neutral sub because they have positive news to talk about. This then gets criticized as a "take over" by the pro-JB people, who are used to being able to bully pro-BL people out of the sub. But it's actually a normal result of a very favorable week for BL.

There's just a real misunderstanding in the sub of what it means to be a neutral sub. It would be normal for a neutral sub's comments to vacillate between sides depending on what is happening in the case, and for supporters of the side that is "winning" at any given moment to be more active and vocal. When JB was doing much better than BL in the case, the sub was dominated by pro-JB posts and comments and BL people didn't say they were "taking over." They just accepted that's how it was and either risked posting there, knowing they'd get downvoted, or retreated to the pro-BL sub. Now the reverse is happening and the pro-JB people aren't even being downvoted or yelled at the way pro-BL people have been, and the JB people are claiming conspiracy. It's interesting.

[Anonymous]

But when pro-BL people, who exist,

For some, this is the most controversial thing you could possibly say!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Something very fishy is going on with that IEWU sub. The main mod was extremely pro-Justin but decided to hand it over to someone who is pro-Blake but still apparently somewhat neutral. I'm beginning to think they bought the sub from her.

Except there are multiple new mods and the most vocal one (the one responding to criticism in comments) is pro-JB.

The majority the last time I checked were all pro-BL, and the main mod themselves is pro-BL. And the only reason the pro-JB one is the most vocal is not because they have the most power, but because all the pro-BL mods are cowards, since they know they're going to have to deal with a large number of pro-JB posters.

This is directly contradictory because you say they are all pro-BL but then say the pro-JB mod (who apparently doesn't exist) is vocal. Obviously there is a pro-JB mod because that person is being vocal in the comments.

I think the issue is that some pro-JB people don't want the neutral sub to be neutral. They want it to be pro-JB while also claiming it's neutral because then they can say "look, even the neutral sub is pro-JB" as evidence of his support. But when pro-BL people, who exist, post there, the JB people aggressively downvote them, argue with them, make fun of them.

The ruling on Justin's claims made the pro-BL group bolder and more willing to put up with those behaviors, so more of them are posting in the neutral sub because they have positive news to talk about. This then gets criticized as a "take over" by the pro-JB people, who are used to being able to bully pro-BL people out of the sub. But it's actually a normal result of a very favorable week for BL.

There's just a real misunderstanding in the sub of what it means to be a neutral sub. It would be normal for a neutral sub's comments to vacillate between sides depending on what is happening in the case, and for supporters of the side that is "winning" at any given moment to be more active and vocal. When JB was doing much better than BL in the case, the sub was dominated by pro-JB posts and comments and BL people didn't say they were "taking over." They just accepted that's how it was and either risked posting there, knowing they'd get downvoted, or retreated to the pro-BL sub. Now the reverse is happening and the pro-JB people aren't even being downvoted or yelled at the way pro-BL people have been, and the JB people are claiming conspiracy. It's interesting.

I said *the majority" were all pro-BL. That "all" was unnecessary, but my sentence starts off with saying the *majority* are. I think the issue is that pro-BL people don't want the neutral sub to be neutral . You're forgetting the sub was started months ago, and many people were unsure or maybe just slightly leaning one way or another, and it wasn't until more receipts from JB came out and more people started to talk amongst themselves that people began believing that Blake was lying. You can't control who ends up becoming pro-JB, and the pro-BL supporters HATE that most people took his side. It's why the pro-BL mods are banning pro-JB users.

This is going to be my last post on this topic, because I don't want to use this forum to talk about another forum, and unlike you, I'm not paid for by the word, so I don't have more time to devote to discussing this.

[Anonymous]

I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

[Anonymous]

Hudson filed a proposed stipulation signed by all the parties, just requiring Liman’s signature, that drops the two specific emotional distress counts from her complaint, with prejudice.

[Anonymous]

Also noting that some previously pro-Baldoni posters on that sub have definitely turned somewhat, and are now at least anti-Freedman and arguing that Garofalo should take over/be more involved. That seems to be real and not any kind of purchased advocacy. They still support Baldoni.

[Anonymous]

And pro-Baldoni posters used to have plenty of time to post here all weekend long when the case was going better for them — dozens of posts per weekend day. Less to say now, and casting aspersions at Lively supporters who are excited by what’s going on now and posting about it. Poor sportsmanship as always.

[Anonymous]

DP

I’m a neutral to pro Jb poster who hasn’t posted much but only because the obvious BL shills on here are so obvious and annoying to listen to. Everyone normal on here understands you two are fake/not organic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m different PP than Po above, and the one who first posted about the mod change on that sub.

I don’t know what’s going on over there. Was the change bought? Was the mod who left the one who was being paid? I dunno.

But the idea that the sub was “neutral” under prior mod is nuts. Pro-Lively posters were banned there frequently.

I saw a discussion about a mod turnover on a Swift sub, that previously criticized a Swift enemy who had bought her recordings. With the change, the site turned into a Swift snark site? I don’t know its status now.

What if that person had bought the prior IEWlawsuits mod. Now he is getting subpoenaed and might not want to have those connections. Also, remember the text between Nathan and the other PR rep, congratulating themselves on quieting a press story that could have been much worse, and ending with “at least they didn’t bring up scooter!”

This sounds like a conspiracy theory though so I’ll stop.

But the idea that the lawsuits sub was “neutral” even though it billed itself as such is a joke. Lively supporters were scorned and mocked. Similar to what Baldoni supporters do/did/are even now still doing here. PP above is still calling us bots, even though her entire weltanschauung is falling apart before her eyes because she has been wrong about everything and we, the Lively supporters, have been right.

I hope more info on the smear gets exposed and I hope Amber Heard gets vindicated, too.

You mean Blake livelys smear against justin?

Well, that claim was just tossed out by a judge for being wholly unsupported. While Lively’s claims all remain. Sorry not sorry.

He didn’t bring a legal claim about the current PR smear campaign as far as I’m aware. But you can confirm as you spend 14+ hours a day on this case, even though you’re just a ‘neutral’ Arlington mom, right? Nothing to see here, right? Totally normal.

In any event, anyone paying attention can see the desperate PR efforts all over this thread and places like Reddit and TikTok. Your team even hired a psyops CIA guy to help.

Get real.