Stuyvesant class of 2025 colleges

[Anonymous]

Stuy class of 2025 College Destinations

https://www.instagram.com/stuy2025grads/?hl=en

MIT - 6
Harvard - 6
Yale - 11
Princeton - 7
Cornell - 22
NYU - 11
UMich - 9
UC Berkeley - 3
Duke - 3
UNC Chapel Hill - 1
Stanford University - 1
Johns Hopkins - 1
Northwestern - 4
U Penn - 4
University of Chicago - 3
Brown - 6
Columbia - 3
Dartmouth - 1
UCLA - 1
Rice - 2
Vanderbilt - 4
Carnegie Mellon - 3
Georgetown - 7
USC (L.A.) - 1

[Anonymous]

Class of 2025 (original freshman year students-
a) Asian: 78.2%

b) Black: 2.4%

c) Hispanic or Latinx: 4.9%

d) White: 19.9%

e) Other: 2.0%

[Anonymous]

Free/reduced lunch 49%

Admissions based SOLELY on an admissions test.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Class of 2025 (original freshman year students-
a) Asian: 78.2%

b) Black: 2.4%

c) Hispanic or Latinx: 4.9%

d) White: 19.9%

e) Other: 2.0%

That is not so different from TJ, where 19% of the students are whites, although the Hispanic or Latinx are 7%.

[Anonymous]

Notably, the FARM percentage stays relatively stable at Stuyvesant.

The FARM percentage at TJ see significant drop off.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Free/reduced lunch 49%

Admissions based SOLELY on an admissions test.

Yes, but with Stuyvesant, it is 1 of several high school options admitted off of the same test, Competitive, yes, but not without good back up options if Stuy was the first choice but didn't make the cut. At my alma mater, Stuy and Bronx science were pretty equally represented with a spattering of other NYC specialized high schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Free/reduced lunch 49%

Admissions based SOLELY on an admissions test.

Impressive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Free/reduced lunch 49%

Admissions based SOLELY on an admissions test.

Yes, but with Stuyvesant, it is 1 of several high school options admitted off of the same test, Competitive, yes, but not without good back up options if Stuy was the first choice but didn't make the cut. At my alma mater, Stuy and Bronx science were pretty equally represented with a spattering of other NYC specialized high schools.

I guess the point I was trying to make was that a test only admissions process selects plenty of poor kids.

Bronx science also very high FARM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Free/reduced lunch 49%

Admissions based SOLELY on an admissions test.

Yes, but with Stuyvesant, it is 1 of several high school options admitted off of the same test, Competitive, yes, but not without good back up options if Stuy was the first choice but didn't make the cut. At my alma mater, Stuy and Bronx science were pretty equally represented with a spattering of other NYC specialized high schools.

I guess the point I was trying to make was that a test only admissions process selects plenty of poor kids.

Bronx science also very high FARM.

NYC school must do a much better job of educating their FARMS students than FCPS…..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Notably, the FARM percentage stays relatively stable at Stuyvesant.

The FARM percentage at TJ see significant drop off.

At TJ, political agenda has made racial balancing a priority over FARMS. If race based essay selection was removed, TJ would have had more FARMS but then Asian American percent would have gone up too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Free/reduced lunch 49%

Admissions based SOLELY on an admissions test.

Yes, but with Stuyvesant, it is 1 of several high school options admitted off of the same test, Competitive, yes, but not without good back up options if Stuy was the first choice but didn't make the cut. At my alma mater, Stuy and Bronx science were pretty equally represented with a spattering of other NYC specialized high schools.

I guess the point I was trying to make was that a test only admissions process selects plenty of poor kids.

Bronx science also very high FARM.

NYC school must do a much better job of educating their FARMS students than FCPS…..

It's a few things

Asians in NYC are largely poor immigrants that value education more than other groups.

Most of the wealthy kids go to private school.

Most of the UMC kids move to the suburbs.

A lot of the conspicuously high performing URM kids go to private on scholarship ( the private schools in NYC have a program to find and recruit them).

And three whole district is pretty much FARM so their programs are geared towards that group. FCPS is mostly middle class so that's who it is built for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Free/reduced lunch 49%

Admissions based SOLELY on an admissions test.

Yes, but with Stuyvesant, it is 1 of several high school options admitted off of the same test, Competitive, yes, but not without good back up options if Stuy was the first choice but didn't make the cut. At my alma mater, Stuy and Bronx science were pretty equally represented with a spattering of other NYC specialized high schools.

I guess the point I was trying to make was that a test only admissions process selects plenty of poor kids.

Bronx science also very high FARM.

NYC school must do a much better job of educating their FARMS students than FCPS…..

It's a few things

Asians in NYC are largely poor immigrants that value education more than other groups.

Most of the wealthy kids go to private school.

Most of the UMC kids move to the suburbs.

A lot of the conspicuously high performing URM kids go to private on scholarship ( the private schools in NYC have a program to find and recruit them).

And the whole of NYCDOE is pretty much FARM so their programs are geared towards that group. FCPS is mostly middle class so that's who it is built for.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Free/reduced lunch 49%

Admissions based SOLELY on an admissions test.

Yes, but with Stuyvesant, it is 1 of several high school options admitted off of the same test, Competitive, yes, but not without good back up options if Stuy was the first choice but didn't make the cut. At my alma mater, Stuy and Bronx science were pretty equally represented with a spattering of other NYC specialized high schools.

I guess the point I was trying to make was that a test only admissions process selects plenty of poor kids.

Bronx science also very high FARM.

Largely because more poor kids attend an urban public school district than a wealthy suburban one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Free/reduced lunch 49%

Admissions based SOLELY on an admissions test.

As it should be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Free/reduced lunch 49%

Admissions based SOLELY on an admissions test.

As it should be.