Top Feeders to Tech and Wall Street

[Anonymous]

Tech:

1. Berkeley, 1041 employed (Google, Amazon, Facebook)
2. Univ. of Illinois, 598 employed (Google, Amazon, Microsoft)
3. UMich, 568 employed (Microsoft, Amazon, Google)
4. Carnegie, 530 employed (google, Microsoft, Facebook)
5. UWash, 511 employed (Microsoft, Amazon, Google)


Top Feeders to Wall Street and investment banking.

1. NYU, 386 employed (morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan, citi)
2. UMich, 296 employed (Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs)
3. Cornell, 279 employed (J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America)
4. Columbia, 259 empliyed (Jo Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley)
5. Berkeley, 233 employed (Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs)

[Anonymous]

Moral of the story? The ivies are overrated.

[Anonymous]

It's a very tough year for tech. The majority of the NGs could not land a job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Moral of the story? The ivies are overrated.

These numbers are not normalized.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Moral of the story? The ivies are overrated.

These numbers are not normalized.

Nah, the larger the school, the more impressive actually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Moral of the story? The ivies are overrated.

They are but not by this data. Adjust for enrollment and you get a very different story. The tech schools are ok but the investment banking list is crap. Lazy work copying a college transitions webpage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Moral of the story? The ivies are overrated.

These numbers are not normalized.

Nah, the larger the school, the more impressive actually.

Why would yo make such a statement?

[Anonymous]

Bucknell.

[Anonymous]

You need to normalize the numbers.

[Anonymous]

Harvey Mudd beats top 5 by a mile, per capita.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Moral of the story? The ivies are overrated.

These numbers are not normalized.

Nah, the larger the school, the more impressive actually.

Why would yo make such a statement?

For instance, by your logic Arizona state and university of central Florida should be top of the list based on population . It’s much more impressive to open your doors to a wider range of students and still manage produce this kind of result.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harvey Mudd beats top 5 by a mile, per capita.

I don’t know about finance, but from my experience in tech, managers get googly eyes when they see Berkeley. Something about the work ethic of depressed kids that had to fend for themselves. I know one who straight up said he avoids Stanford grads lol.

[Anonymous]

Columbia is the winner for Wall Street by a long shot. They only have about 2,000 grads per year.
Cornell is twice the size.

[Anonymous]

And number of kids Wall Street and tech is the measure of what exactly? Oh for the days of kids wanting to do good, not just get rich 😞

[Anonymous]

For tech? San Jose state is the number one feeder.