Judges consider setting up armed security in response to MAGA terrorism

[Anonymous]

This is the world we live in now, I guess.

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/trump-judges-security-marshals-6e080ac6?st=uKC3u7&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

[Anonymous]

This needs to happen: “ On Thursday, Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey introduced legislation that would allow the Chief Justice and Judicial Conference to appoint the head of the Marshals, placing the courts in charge of their own security. In a statement, Booker said the legislation was necessary because Trump “has made it abundantly clear through his words and actions that he does not respect the law, court orders, the safety of our judges, or our institutions.””

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This needs to happen: “ On Thursday, Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey introduced legislation that would allow the Chief Justice and Judicial Conference to appoint the head of the Marshals, placing the courts in charge of their own security. In a statement, Booker said the legislation was necessary because Trump “has made it abundantly clear through his words and actions that he does not respect the law, court orders, the safety of our judges, or our institutions.””

Does Booker still have any credibility left? He was the only democrat to vote in favor of appointing Trump's pal, Kushner

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This needs to happen: “ On Thursday, Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey introduced legislation that would allow the Chief Justice and Judicial Conference to appoint the head of the Marshals, placing the courts in charge of their own security. In a statement, Booker said the legislation was necessary because Trump “has made it abundantly clear through his words and actions that he does not respect the law, court orders, the safety of our judges, or our institutions.””

This would place the courts in charge of the executive branch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This needs to happen: “ On Thursday, Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey introduced legislation that would allow the Chief Justice and Judicial Conference to appoint the head of the Marshals, placing the courts in charge of their own security. In a statement, Booker said the legislation was necessary because Trump “has made it abundantly clear through his words and actions that he does not respect the law, court orders, the safety of our judges, or our institutions.””

This would place the courts in charge of the executive branch.

No, it would put the courts in a position of ensuring they are not slaughtered by idealogues.

Why would you put your safety in the hands of people who want you dead or compromised?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This needs to happen: “ On Thursday, Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey introduced legislation that would allow the Chief Justice and Judicial Conference to appoint the head of the Marshals, placing the courts in charge of their own security. In a statement, Booker said the legislation was necessary because Trump “has made it abundantly clear through his words and actions that he does not respect the law, court orders, the safety of our judges, or our institutions.””

Does Booker still have any credibility left? He was the only democrat to vote in favor of appointing Trump's pal, Kushner

Booker is loyal to his paymasters, even if they are traitors.

https://newrepublic.com/post/195475/cory-booker-democrat-vote-confirm-jared-kushner-father-charles

[Anonymous]

This should have happened last term.
The judicial branch should have been given the ability to enforce while Biden was still in office.
Elected officials should have been banned from shilling crypto.
Hatch act should have been extended to the president.
The democrats had 2 years to close obvious loopholes and they decided that strongly worded letters would suffice, if/when MAGA came back to town.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This needs to happen: “ On Thursday, Democratic Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey introduced legislation that would allow the Chief Justice and Judicial Conference to appoint the head of the Marshals, placing the courts in charge of their own security. In a statement, Booker said the legislation was necessary because Trump “has made it abundantly clear through his words and actions that he does not respect the law, court orders, the safety of our judges, or our institutions.””

Does Booker still have any credibility left? He was the only democrat to vote in favor of appointing Trump's pal, Kushner

You can keep your purity tests. This is more important in the scheme of things.