| Because the front yard is measured from the forward-most wall, the addition shrinks that significantly. there might be just enough area for two car wide pad, but it is very close to hitting 30%, and very well could go over. |
I don't have measurements, but it doesn't look like the addition extends forward from house enough that there wouldn't be space between the addition and the sidewalk. Maybe not for a Surburban, but a car should fit fine. And if that's enough for one, then it should be enough for two- with the other one next to it. Unless that would push them over 30% of the front yard. Which it very well could. |
Street parking is already allowed and done in that neighborhood. That's not an adverse impact. It has a side effect of slowing cars down on the road. |
That’s irrelevant since Fairfax County requires off street parking. |
So is tge homeowner just deliberately building whatever he wants in complete violation of zoning laws and in contradiction to his permits, with a plan to just get approval after the fact? So can everyone else doing renovations in Fairfax County use the same method? |
Yes, and if he creates two spots then there isn't anything to complain about there. |
We have a side by side with a single car entryway from the road. You need around a minimum of 8-10 feet of driveway from the back bumper to the entry point to get both cars into the driveway without driving through the yard. This is for cars and smaller SUV type cars. For larger SUVs, minivans and trucks, you need the full 10 feet from the back bumper. |
The second spot will not be functional with a shortened driveway and single entry. The 2nd spot will essentially be a weird front yard concrete patio. |
It is expressly allowed to have parking spots that are only accessible by moving another parked car. |
You're making up a requirement. |
But if the driveway is as long as the car, he cannot access the spot even if he mives the other car, without driving over the sidewalk and easement. It is not going to be a functional parking spot |
No, I am explaining logistics of a single entry driveway. |
Momentarily setting aside the side setback, everything else that has been brought up seems to be correctible. There seems to be just enough room for a second parking spot. And if there are stairs going into the new addition that create a new setback problem, those could be removed. The side sideback isn't correctible. It is a mistake that never should have happened, but it did. It would be a grossly disproportionate response to require a teardown over 6 inches, both in this case and in general. If there's really a concern about encouraging such mistakes, a better deterrent would be a fine, not a teardown when there is no meaningful impact. I don't think that's a realistic concern, though. |
Ok, but you suggested that that additional 8-10 ft is necessary here, but it isn't. At least, not to be compliant with code for parking. |
You don't need that much extra space to pull in and sufficiently straighten out the car. Certainly not 10 ft. And you already have to drive to over the sidewalk to reach the spots, so I'm not sure why you're complaining about that. |