Industry peer sent article decrying the MSMs biased reporting
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
- I don’t completely disagree that there is some bias- but then linked to some publications he views as ‘fact based’ and focused on ‘issues important to center right readers’. He claims the MSM (‘dinosaur’ media) slanders this ‘new media’ by calling it ‘right wing’ and that he can’t ever forgive Obama for some quote he made about ‘guns and bibles’.
Again, I felt open to the idea of some bias so I went to these new media sites- daily caller, daily signal. It was mostly a pile of complete garbage rehashing of alleged Dem failures. Hunter laptop, Biden wasn’t sharp as a tack, Biden was involved in hunters crooked business dealings, blah blah. Seriously? This is what these ‘fact based’ publications are focused on? This is important news? What in the world? |
Anonymous
|
I'm always confused that the right claims the MSM is biased, but yet also cannot offer any alternate source. I mean, Fox News is a joke and also the best they've got to offer?
FWIW, I read National Review sometimes which is conservative, but it's also still more opinion than basic factual. |
Anonymous
|
Pretty much all media is a complete joke now. Legacy media, new media, left, right, all of it. It’s all garbage now, for myriad reasons.
- a 30+ year photojournalist |
Anonymous
Can you explain why it’s all garbage? Do you think the NYT and the WSJ are equally as garbage as say Fox or the Daily Caller? |
Anonymous
I know right? CRAZY TALK! Biden is as sharp as ever!! |
Anonymous
+1 |
Anonymous
Maybe not, but it’s months later. Haven’t they moved on? Aren’t there other important issue to discuss rather than someone who is no longer president and his sons laptop? |
Anonymous
Running stories about Biden at this point is just diversion from running relevant news that they don't want their readers to know. Please tell me that you know that. |
Anonymous
You really cannot discuss the current state of mainstream media in the U.S. while entirely ignoring how we arrived where we are today. |
Anonymous
Is Biden the president? No? So who the eff cares? |
Anonymous
This. The right wing wants to sow distrust in legacy media, yet the right wing "alternative" is even less fact-based, and even more dishonest, untrustworthy and biased than the legacy media. |
Anonymous
Geeze. I know Biden's past his prime and not all there, but I'll take Joe with all his stuttering and gaffes and confusion any day of the week over this chaotic dementia-brain freak show we have going on right now. |
Anonymous
The point is to make one side meet impossible standards (and criticize them severely when they fall short), while the other side does not claim to meet any standards at all. It's supposed to be a paradox that dissuades Joe Public from having any standards at all and give up their liberty & rights to an elite clique. |
Anonymous
Just ignore the media's bias and lying on those issues. Move on and assume there is no bias and lying on what they say now. |
Anonymous
| but hillary clintons emails |