This isn't what it looks like, right?

Anonymous
Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/
Anonymous
It has been and will be used to stop people from protesting.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Some people on Twitter X (I know!) said that this, and particularly point 4, is the beginning of martial law. Please talk me off the ledge and tell me why it isn't. Thank you.


https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/strengthening-and-unleashing-americas-law-enforcement-to-pursue-criminals-and-protect-innocent-citizens/


The hangman has become the judge.
Anonymous
They are going to need martial law when there is nothing on the shelves and people get desperate.
Anonymous
unlawfully engage in discrimination or civil-rights violations under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives that restrict law enforcement activity or endanger citizens.


Who decides what 'endanger citizens' means?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
unlawfully engage in discrimination or civil-rights violations under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives that restrict law enforcement activity or endanger citizens.


Who decides what 'endanger citizens' means?


Law enforcement. It's their job. We have laws.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
unlawfully engage in discrimination or civil-rights violations under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives that restrict law enforcement activity or endanger citizens.


Who decides what 'endanger citizens' means?


Dear Leader, of course.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
unlawfully engage in discrimination or civil-rights violations under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives that restrict law enforcement activity or endanger citizens.


Who decides what 'endanger citizens' means?


Law enforcement. It's their job. We have laws.


Who decides who is law enforcement?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
unlawfully engage in discrimination or civil-rights violations under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives that restrict law enforcement activity or endanger citizens.


Who decides what 'endanger citizens' means?


Law enforcement. It's their job. We have laws.


No, the answer is the courts. The courts decide.
Anonymous
Yes, it’s exactly what it looks like. It’s timed for the many scheculed protests that have been planned for May Day (5/1) and the likely disarray that will surely follow from the empty shelves that will be coming soon in response to Trump’s completely unnecessary tariffs. This has been in the planning for quite some time.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:They are going to need martial law when there is nothing on the shelves and people get desperate.


This. Martial Law is the only way to stop the MAGA revolt that's going to happen.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
unlawfully engage in discrimination or civil-rights violations under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives that restrict law enforcement activity or endanger citizens.


Who decides what 'endanger citizens' means?


Law enforcement. It's their job. We have laws.


No, the answer is the courts. The courts decide.


Long after people are terrorized and lives are ruined by Trump’s brown shirts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
unlawfully engage in discrimination or civil-rights violations under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives that restrict law enforcement activity or endanger citizens.


Who decides what 'endanger citizens' means?


Law enforcement. It's their job. We have laws.


No, the answer is the courts. The courts decide.


There is already codified law. I'm sure people here are intelligent enough to determine what behavior endangers the public. I know it's a tough concept to wrap your heads around but law enforcement's purpose is to enforce the established laws.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
unlawfully engage in discrimination or civil-rights violations under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives that restrict law enforcement activity or endanger citizens.


Who decides what 'endanger citizens' means?


If this is a serious question I'd be happy to answer it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
unlawfully engage in discrimination or civil-rights violations under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives that restrict law enforcement activity or endanger citizens.


Who decides what 'endanger citizens' means?


Law enforcement. It's their job. We have laws.

You guys never took civics? Law ENFORCEment enforces the law, they do not get to interpret the law. Except in an authoritarian regime.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: