Demi Moore on People Magazine

[Anonymous]

I really like Demi Moore, but the article in People Magazine that asks all of us to completely ignore the fact that she has had significant work done to her face and accept it as natural aging is absurd.
There is nothing wrong with having work, lots of work. I just wish that the narrative did not try to suspend reality. All the talk of acceptance, etc.
Thoughts?

[Anonymous]

Link?

[Anonymous]

I laughed at her comments about her antagonistic relationship with her body her whole life but then when she just chilled out and made peace with herself her weight effortlessly settled at 40 pounds lighter. When does that ever happen irl.

[Anonymous]

And she had ribs taken out to make herself skinnier, didn't she?

Was that just a rumor? From long ago. No PR campaign can negate the negative of that.

[Anonymous]

Yes, her face is completely different now. Wish she’d just admit that.

[Anonymous]

I think it’s sad bc she is a good actress and her movie was good, but she is physically just disfigured by surgery, and clearly starves to be thin. It feels dystopian to deem her most beautiful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I laughed at her comments about her antagonistic relationship with her body her whole life but then when she just chilled out and made peace with herself her weight effortlessly settled at 40 pounds lighter. When does that ever happen irl.

When you effortlessly start jabbing yourself with tirzepatide every Sunday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I laughed at her comments about her antagonistic relationship with her body her whole life but then when she just chilled out and made peace with herself her weight effortlessly settled at 40 pounds lighter. When does that ever happen irl.

I remember her saying something similar many years ago, and I thought she was being disingenuous. Her look is not maintained effortlessly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I laughed at her comments about her antagonistic relationship with her body her whole life but then when she just chilled out and made peace with herself her weight effortlessly settled at 40 pounds lighter. When does that ever happen irl.

I remember her saying something similar many years ago, and I thought she was being disingenuous. Her look is not maintained effortlessly.

I know someone like this in real life. A lovely person. She is always talking about her sweet tooth and how she eats so much junk food. But if you spend a couple days fully with her, you see that she eats barely anything at all. It is a weird dichotomy to act like you overindulge and don't try at all, when it's clear you're eating almost nothing at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really like Demi Moore, but the article in People Magazine that asks all of us to completely ignore the fact that she has had significant work done to her face and accept it as natural aging is absurd.
There is nothing wrong with having work, lots of work. I just wish that the narrative did not try to suspend reality. All the talk of acceptance, etc.
Thoughts?

Having work done, of itself, is an attempt to suspend the reality of aging. We shouldn't be surprised that the narrative then matches the action. Not talking about having work done is part and parcel of having the work done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I really like Demi Moore, but the article in People Magazine that asks all of us to completely ignore the fact that she has had significant work done to her face and accept it as natural aging is absurd.
There is nothing wrong with having work, lots of work. I just wish that the narrative did not try to suspend reality. All the talk of acceptance, etc.
Thoughts?

Yeah she didn't really speak about it too much about the substance campgian either. It was jarring because she edits her pics to death on IG. She clearly still has some issues with aging and shouldn't be taken that pedestal. It's unhealthy and will only lead her to a negative mind space in the future.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I really like Demi Moore, but the article in People Magazine that asks all of us to completely ignore the fact that she has had significant work done to her face and accept it as natural aging is absurd.
There is nothing wrong with having work, lots of work. I just wish that the narrative did not try to suspend reality. All the talk of acceptance, etc.
Thoughts?

Having work done, of itself, is an attempt to suspend the reality of aging. We shouldn't be surprised that the narrative then matches the action. Not talking about having work done is part and parcel of having the work done.

IDK. For me it’s ok to not talk about it, but then son’t talk about it. Don’t talk about how you’re naturally aging and whatever. Just leave the aging/appearance talk out of it if you aren’t going to be honest about the work.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s sad bc she is a good actress and her movie was good, but she is physically just disfigured by surgery, and clearly starves to be thin. It feels dystopian to deem her most beautiful.

I think thats why people don't bring it up. It's sad. All celebs get plastic surgery but she's not using it to aid aging. She's using it to reverse it.

[Anonymous]

This will just delay her from ever cutting her long hair.

[Anonymous]

Can we talk about her hair? It looks so thick and healthy. I think it looks natural, but considering how much she spends to maintain her looks, do you think she has some sort of wig/extensions?