| Such as summarizing documents? |
| And is it against company policy? |
|
Yes
No |
| Nope and nope but there are very strict parameters in how we can use it. |
| No and yes, mostly. There are some instances where people can use a program my agency developed if they need it as a reasonable accommodation. |
| I use it frequently to get a quick summary of things, to proofread, and for other purposes. |
|
Forgot to add, no rule against it.
I also use a proprietary pair AI for legal research and drafting. |
| No, I'm good at my job. |
Not as good as you would be with AI! haha. |
| Yes - speeds things up |
|
No. Yes.
My company doesn't want our IP training ChatGPT. |
| We can use copilot but not ChatGPT. Copilot doesn’t use company data to train, potentially making it publicly accessible. I find it marginally helpful. I can write flow of consciousness, have it clean up the language, then edi. |
| No. I don’t even have an account. |
Some AI has its place as a tool but the OP said ChatGPT. ChatGPT has no valid function. It's an expensive toy. |
|
I tried using it for a short cut to help me. It wasn’t helpful at all because the documents require critical thinking and extrapolating information. AI still has a long way to go!!
I did have it summarize Project 2025 and focus specifically on my agency and field. |