|
All youth soccer players are spoiled by having amazing expensive kits. Which one is nicer in your opinion ? Adidas, Nike? Puma?
Adidas seem to be the majority of the clubs and have a more sophisticated design than Nike. Agreed? |
| Anything but Capelli. |
| Adidas has the best, Hummel, Puma are fine. No experience with Nike and while I don't hate capelli, lots do. |
+100 Two years the uniforms arrived after Fall season was over. Customer service was awful |
| I liked Nike better than adidas |
| Joma sees to be very nice quality and style |
|
I prefer Nike because its women's uniforms are actually cut for female bodies.
OP, I don't think anyone is spoiled. These are clothes that kids are wearing weekly or more, that has to stand up to sweat, dirt, tears, being thrown on the ground, stuffed in a smelly bag etc. Additionally, you may have a young player, but as they get older, you need a uniform that can last (as they don't grow out of them) and that can handle the stress and strain that comes with a 120-150-lb body vs. a 75 lb body. Older kids are on the field more often and need a higher quality uniform -- and they need one uniform for the whole team! |
| Adidas uniforms are boxy and not made for women or girls. I think their fabric is too thick, too. |
Spoke like a soccer.com rep |
| the Adidas shorts are terrible for the girls. Nike is a slimmer cut. |