Redshirting consequences at Lafayette

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:“I’ve lost faith in our public schools,” says parent trying to get another year of public school.


LOL
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So this is only happening at Lafayette? Why do these parents keep getting airtime?


These parents keep getting airtime because they are trying to get airtime. Parents at other schools have sensibly kept their mouth shut and have been able to quietly convince their principals to allow the redshirting. But you can’t bow to a public tantrum.


So much is focused on the (admittedly bad) central office while it appears central told the schools you handle it here's a framework and Lafayette seemed to make the final decision.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine if these parents devoted as much energy to getting their kids IEPs or tutoring instead of trying to get them enrolled in kindergarten. If their kids are really so much slower at learning than other kids in the neighborhood, what magic do they think is going to happen in kindergarten?


It's really obvious the kids have no special needs and the parents know it. They don't want to get their kid an IEP or a tutor, they want their son to effortlessly excel and be told by every teacher that he's the very smartest, the tallest, the cleverest, the most impressive kid in the grade. If it's not looking like something that's going to happen organically they'll just put them in a class with younger kids so they "stand out" the way mom and dad wanted/expected them to.

It's funny because I'm from Texas where redshirting parents are *extremely* upfront about this - they want their sons to have the height/weight/testosterone/muscle advantage when they get to high school so they can start on their sports teams and maybe even get a scholarship. In DC people want the same thing - an unearned advantage for their son - but twist themselves into pretzels to pretend that they aren't trying to rig the system. In fact, they pretend the system is the unfair thing! How could they say that kids with a certain birthday should enroll by a certain date and then . . . have the nerve to enforce it??! Rules that apply to other kids also apply to my kid? How is that fair? Not for my dear Henry!


Texas is NOT DC. Name one wealthy parent who cares about football. Most won’t even let their children play football


Yes. This is the point. Both wealthy DC and Texas parents want their kids to redshirt for advantages, just different advantages. It's just the Texas parents are upfront about it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine if these parents devoted as much energy to getting their kids IEPs or tutoring instead of trying to get them enrolled in kindergarten. If their kids are really so much slower at learning than other kids in the neighborhood, what magic do they think is going to happen in kindergarten?


It's really obvious the kids have no special needs and the parents know it. They don't want to get their kid an IEP or a tutor, they want their son to effortlessly excel and be told by every teacher that he's the very smartest, the tallest, the cleverest, the most impressive kid in the grade. If it's not looking like something that's going to happen organically they'll just put them in a class with younger kids so they "stand out" the way mom and dad wanted/expected them to.

It's funny because I'm from Texas where redshirting parents are *extremely* upfront about this - they want their sons to have the height/weight/testosterone/muscle advantage when they get to high school so they can start on their sports teams and maybe even get a scholarship. In DC people want the same thing - an unearned advantage for their son - but twist themselves into pretzels to pretend that they aren't trying to rig the system. In fact, they pretend the system is the unfair thing! How could they say that kids with a certain birthday should enroll by a certain date and then . . . have the nerve to enforce it??! Rules that apply to other kids also apply to my kid? How is that fair? Not for my dear Henry!


Texas is NOT DC. Name one wealthy parent who cares about football. Most won’t even let their children play football


Yes. This is the point. Both wealthy DC and Texas parents want their kids to redshirt for advantages, just different advantages. It's just the Texas parents are upfront about it.


If for whatever reason you think my kid is in competition with your kid, that’s very funny to me. They’re not in competition.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine if these parents devoted as much energy to getting their kids IEPs or tutoring instead of trying to get them enrolled in kindergarten. If their kids are really so much slower at learning than other kids in the neighborhood, what magic do they think is going to happen in kindergarten?


It's really obvious the kids have no special needs and the parents know it. They don't want to get their kid an IEP or a tutor, they want their son to effortlessly excel and be told by every teacher that he's the very smartest, the tallest, the cleverest, the most impressive kid in the grade. If it's not looking like something that's going to happen organically they'll just put them in a class with younger kids so they "stand out" the way mom and dad wanted/expected them to.

It's funny because I'm from Texas where redshirting parents are *extremely* upfront about this - they want their sons to have the height/weight/testosterone/muscle advantage when they get to high school so they can start on their sports teams and maybe even get a scholarship. In DC people want the same thing - an unearned advantage for their son - but twist themselves into pretzels to pretend that they aren't trying to rig the system. In fact, they pretend the system is the unfair thing! How could they say that kids with a certain birthday should enroll by a certain date and then . . . have the nerve to enforce it??! Rules that apply to other kids also apply to my kid? How is that fair? Not for my dear Henry!


Texas is NOT DC. Name one wealthy parent who cares about football. Most won’t even let their children play football


Yes. This is the point. Both wealthy DC and Texas parents want their kids to redshirt for advantages, just different advantages. It's just the Texas parents are upfront about it.


If for whatever reason you think my kid is in competition with your kid, that’s very funny to me. They’re not in competition.


OK, Avra.
Tell it to your reporter friends.
Maybe your kid is not in competition with anyone but you sure seem to be.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine if these parents devoted as much energy to getting their kids IEPs or tutoring instead of trying to get them enrolled in kindergarten. If their kids are really so much slower at learning than other kids in the neighborhood, what magic do they think is going to happen in kindergarten?


It's really obvious the kids have no special needs and the parents know it. They don't want to get their kid an IEP or a tutor, they want their son to effortlessly excel and be told by every teacher that he's the very smartest, the tallest, the cleverest, the most impressive kid in the grade. If it's not looking like something that's going to happen organically they'll just put them in a class with younger kids so they "stand out" the way mom and dad wanted/expected them to.

It's funny because I'm from Texas where redshirting parents are *extremely* upfront about this - they want their sons to have the height/weight/testosterone/muscle advantage when they get to high school so they can start on their sports teams and maybe even get a scholarship. In DC people want the same thing - an unearned advantage for their son - but twist themselves into pretzels to pretend that they aren't trying to rig the system. In fact, they pretend the system is the unfair thing! How could they say that kids with a certain birthday should enroll by a certain date and then . . . have the nerve to enforce it??! Rules that apply to other kids also apply to my kid? How is that fair? Not for my dear Henry!


Texas is NOT DC. Name one wealthy parent who cares about football. Most won’t even let their children play football


Yes. This is the point. Both wealthy DC and Texas parents want their kids to redshirt for advantages, just different advantages. It's just the Texas parents are upfront about it.


If for whatever reason you think my kid is in competition with your kid, that’s very funny to me. They’re not in competition.


OK, Avra.
Tell it to your reporter friends.
Maybe your kid is not in competition with anyone but you sure seem to be.


Aren’t you clever? Not Avra 🙄
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine if these parents devoted as much energy to getting their kids IEPs or tutoring instead of trying to get them enrolled in kindergarten. If their kids are really so much slower at learning than other kids in the neighborhood, what magic do they think is going to happen in kindergarten?


It's really obvious the kids have no special needs and the parents know it. They don't want to get their kid an IEP or a tutor, they want their son to effortlessly excel and be told by every teacher that he's the very smartest, the tallest, the cleverest, the most impressive kid in the grade. If it's not looking like something that's going to happen organically they'll just put them in a class with younger kids so they "stand out" the way mom and dad wanted/expected them to.

It's funny because I'm from Texas where redshirting parents are *extremely* upfront about this - they want their sons to have the height/weight/testosterone/muscle advantage when they get to high school so they can start on their sports teams and maybe even get a scholarship. In DC people want the same thing - an unearned advantage for their son - but twist themselves into pretzels to pretend that they aren't trying to rig the system. In fact, they pretend the system is the unfair thing! How could they say that kids with a certain birthday should enroll by a certain date and then . . . have the nerve to enforce it??! Rules that apply to other kids also apply to my kid? How is that fair? Not for my dear Henry!


Texas is NOT DC. Name one wealthy parent who cares about football. Most won’t even let their children play football


Yes. This is the point. Both wealthy DC and Texas parents want their kids to redshirt for advantages, just different advantages. It's just the Texas parents are upfront about it.


If for whatever reason you think my kid is in competition with your kid, that’s very funny to me. They’re not in competition.


OK, Avra.
Tell it to your reporter friends.
Maybe your kid is not in competition with anyone but you sure seem to be.


It sounds like Avra is exactly the kind of person you want fighting for DCPS, not against.

Central office being laid-off, threat of Trump’s involvement in DCPS loom, and elite support, which was already low, only falls.

Good job DCPS, and good luck.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Imagine if these parents devoted as much energy to getting their kids IEPs or tutoring instead of trying to get them enrolled in kindergarten. If their kids are really so much slower at learning than other kids in the neighborhood, what magic do they think is going to happen in kindergarten?


It's really obvious the kids have no special needs and the parents know it. They don't want to get their kid an IEP or a tutor, they want their son to effortlessly excel and be told by every teacher that he's the very smartest, the tallest, the cleverest, the most impressive kid in the grade. If it's not looking like something that's going to happen organically they'll just put them in a class with younger kids so they "stand out" the way mom and dad wanted/expected them to.

It's funny because I'm from Texas where redshirting parents are *extremely* upfront about this - they want their sons to have the height/weight/testosterone/muscle advantage when they get to high school so they can start on their sports teams and maybe even get a scholarship. In DC people want the same thing - an unearned advantage for their son - but twist themselves into pretzels to pretend that they aren't trying to rig the system. In fact, they pretend the system is the unfair thing! How could they say that kids with a certain birthday should enroll by a certain date and then . . . have the nerve to enforce it??! Rules that apply to other kids also apply to my kid? How is that fair? Not for my dear Henry!


Texas is NOT DC. Name one wealthy parent who cares about football. Most won’t even let their children play football


Yes. This is the point. Both wealthy DC and Texas parents want their kids to redshirt for advantages, just different advantages. It's just the Texas parents are upfront about it.


If for whatever reason you think my kid is in competition with your kid, that’s very funny to me. They’re not in competition.


OK, Avra.
Tell it to your reporter friends.
Maybe your kid is not in competition with anyone but you sure seem to be.


It sounds like Avra is exactly the kind of person you want fighting for DCPS, not against.

Central office being laid-off, threat of Trump’s involvement in DCPS loom, and elite support, which was already low, only falls.

Good job DCPS, and good luck.


DP but this makes no sense. There's nothing about these parents that say they give a single fig about DCPS as a whole. The only defining characteristics they have demonstrated in their interviews are self interest and entitlement.
post reply Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Message Quick Reply
Go to: