Wouldn’t deporting criminals backfire?

[Anonymous]

Everyone seems fine with deporting violent convicted felons but won’t this backfire? If I commit a crime and know that I won’t go to prison, then why would I hesitate to commit crimes if I’m a criminal. If I’m serving a life sentence for murder and then I’m sent home where I’m free, didn’t I just get out of jail free?

How will this serve justice for the victim?

[Anonymous]

They'll be deported after serving their sentences.

[Anonymous]

They go to prison in their country.

[Anonymous]

why can't we implement faster death penalty for heinous crimes committed by illegals? This would scare them in doing anything bad which is so easy to do now.

[Anonymous]

I'm pretty sure illegal migrants who commit violent crimes must serve their sentence before they are deported.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure illegal migrants who commit violent crimes must serve their sentence before they are deported.

We should bill their home countries for the cost of detention and give those countries the option to transfer them to their own prison if they don't like the US cost of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They'll be deported after serving their sentences.

This is correct. I’m a prosecutor and this issue comes up frequently.

They’ll serve their sentence in whatever prison facility they get sent to. Either before or during that time, ICE will get a detainer, which is a legal request to the prison to keep the person in custody for a finite period of time after completion of the sentence to allow ICE to take custody of them. Once the sentence is over, if everything works correctly, ICE will take custody of the person and handle the removal process.

[Anonymous]

At least in the future perhaps they won't be our problem to address, because they won't have made it past the border to begin with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure illegal migrants who commit violent crimes must serve their sentence before they are deported.

We should bill their home countries for the cost of detention and give those countries the option to transfer them to their own prison if they don't like the US cost of it.

+100

[Anonymous]

Won’t pardoning violent (J6) felons backfire?

[Anonymous]

People keep arguing they’re not subject to the jurisdiction of the US, so good luck keeping them in prison if the court entertains this idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:why can't we implement faster death penalty for heinous crimes committed by illegals? This would scare them in doing anything bad which is so easy to do now.

Because we aren't evil animals and believe in justice for all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Won’t pardoning violent (J6) felons backfire?

It already is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure illegal migrants who commit violent crimes must serve their sentence before they are deported.

I wish violent J6 criminals would have had to serve time but Dumpy needed to form a violent militia and now they are all out sitting for him like good little lap dogs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Everyone seems fine with deporting violent convicted felons but won’t this backfire? If I commit a crime and know that I won’t go to prison, then why would I hesitate to commit crimes if I’m a criminal. If I’m serving a life sentence for murder and then I’m sent home where I’m free, didn’t I just get out of jail free?

How will this serve justice for the victim?

It's a lot more difficult being a criminal in many other countries where you would die in a jail in less than a year because of horrible conditions or the cops would beat you to death or shoot you because the jails are overcrowded.