2024 Girls Lax WCAC ISL Outlook

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ISL is wide open right now. Visi SSAS coming up. What's the tiebreaker for palyoffs? Playing Potomac in the semis is a automatic win.

Potomac troll is back. Great to hear from you again. Wonder when you'll come out from under bridge again.

I don't know why we have to keep breaking it to you: there are way more than one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC beat SJC 16-7

Yet SJC beat the following teams

Ireton 18-6
Cicero 19-8
Bullis 19-7
Seton 19-8
Holy Cross 17-6

What are we even talking about here?

Sadly for SJC those teams r not even in the same ball park as GC. Good for Seton to score 8.

I think the OP was trying to make a point on running up the score which didn't land.

Either way, what that post also shows is that SJC is really good, and GC is still playing at a different level.

SJC will give GC a game in WCAC tournament. Guaranteed. Write it down.

[Anonymous]

SJC needs to get to the championship first. Remember last year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SJC needs to get to the championship first. Remember last year.

That was last year. Don't see Ireton or anyone else upsetting them in semi's this year.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC beat SJC 16-7

Yet SJC beat the following teams

Ireton 18-6
Cicero 19-8
Bullis 19-7
Seton 19-8
Holy Cross 17-6

What are we even talking about here?

Sadly for SJC those teams r not even in the same ball park as GC. Good for Seton to score 8.

I think the OP was trying to make a point on running up the score which didn't land.

Either way, what that post also shows is that SJC is really good, and GC is still playing at a different level.

SJC will give GC a game in WCAC tournament. Guaranteed. Write it down.

What makes you think this?

[Anonymous]

SJC players and parents have been talking a big game the last few years. After this year they will struggle quite a bit so they need to hang on to whatever they can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ISL is wide open right now. Visi SSAS coming up. What's the tiebreaker for palyoffs? Playing Potomac in the semis is a automatic win.

Potomac troll is back. Great to hear from you again. Wonder when you'll come out from under bridge again.

I don't know why we have to keep breaking it to you: there are way more than one.

Why so much hate? You have a school a school that’s hard to get into and a team that’s doing better than it’s ever done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC beat SJC 16-7

Yet SJC beat the following teams

Ireton 18-6
Cicero 19-8
Bullis 19-7
Seton 19-8
Holy Cross 17-6

What are we even talking about here?

Sadly for SJC those teams r not even in the same ball park as GC. Good for Seton to score 8.

I think the OP was trying to make a point on running up the score which didn't land.

Either way, what that post also shows is that SJC is really good, and GC is still playing at a different level.

SJC will give GC a game in WCAC tournament. Guaranteed. Write it down.

You all spent the whole season whining about your coach and now your going to give GC a game?

I guess you're all back on your meds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:You are correct. They also had fast breaks but then would slow the play down to turn over the ball. Not sure what the strategy is, but it does not work for them. And none of them were aggressive on the goal. GC has 20+ girls that would start on any team. sJC has at most 8. They were no match for GC, but who is in this area??

Why would anyone choose a team that deep? Good for the program but there are other schools with better academic reputations and where talented players would actually play. It’s one thing to choose a college program knowing you might not play but care more about winning a championship but for high school I would think most players would rather just play on a competitive team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC beat SJC 16-7

Yet SJC beat the following teams

Ireton 18-6
Cicero 19-8
Bullis 19-7
Seton 19-8
Holy Cross 17-6

What are we even talking about here?

Sadly for SJC those teams r not even in the same ball park as GC. Good for Seton to score 8.

I think the OP was trying to make a point on running up the score which didn't land.

Either way, what that post also shows is that SJC is really good, and GC is still playing at a different level.

SJC will give GC a game in WCAC tournament. Guaranteed. Write it down.

You all spent the whole season whining about your coach and now your going to give GC a game?

I guess you're all back on your meds. [/quote

No whining here. I believe SJC thrives in playoffs. Should be a great game vs GC in finals.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GC beat SJC 16-7

Yet SJC beat the following teams

Ireton 18-6
Cicero 19-8
Bullis 19-7
Seton 19-8
Holy Cross 17-6

What are we even talking about here?

Sadly for SJC those teams r not even in the same ball park as GC. Good for Seton to score 8.

I think the OP was trying to make a point on running up the score which didn't land.

Either way, what that post also shows is that SJC is really good, and GC is still playing at a different level.

SJC will give GC a game in WCAC tournament. Guaranteed. Write it down.

You all spent the whole season whining about your coach and now your going to give GC a game?

I guess you're all back on your meds. [/quote

No whining here. I believe SJC thrives in playoffs. Should be a great game vs GC in finals.

Thrives in the playoffs? Last year in the semi-final SJC lost, at home, to a team you had already beat by 4. Then backed out of the DC championship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are correct. They also had fast breaks but then would slow the play down to turn over the ball. Not sure what the strategy is, but it does not work for them. And none of them were aggressive on the goal. GC has 20+ girls that would start on any team. sJC has at most 8. They were no match for GC, but who is in this area??

Why would anyone choose a team that deep? Good for the program but there are other schools with better academic reputations and where talented players would actually play. It’s one thing to choose a college program knowing you might not play but care more about winning a championship but for high school I would think most players would rather just play on a competitive team.

Here we go again with this nonsense…

[Anonymous]

Hard to beat a team twice.PVI wrote in an article that they studied SJC. Good for them. SJC underestimated and the outcome was not great for them. That game was a lot of things but poor coaching was one of them. They were so outmatched on the draw and adjusted way too late on everything. That was probably SJCs most talented team, you had new D1 commits and NU, Harvard, Gettysburg.

There is a post about SJC parents and kids talking a “good game.” Of all the teams, they seem to talk the least. Seems everyone else talks more about what they are not. That should motivate them but regardless GC will require more from SJC than they may have. One poster is spot on, you can’t win off 8 meters. SJC has to connect in the run of play and be aggressive to the cage.

But they need to get past BI because they will come with a different game. Look to playoff not the championship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are correct. They also had fast breaks but then would slow the play down to turn over the ball. Not sure what the strategy is, but it does not work for them. And none of them were aggressive on the goal. GC has 20+ girls that would start on any team. sJC has at most 8. They were no match for GC, but who is in this area??

Why would anyone choose a team that deep? Good for the program but there are other schools with better academic reputations and where talented players would actually play. It’s one thing to choose a college program knowing you might not play but care more about winning a championship but for high school I would think most players would rather just play on a competitive team.

Here we go again with this nonsense…

Not sure why it’s nonsense? The end game is college—with or without lacrosse and even with lacrosse these girls will have careers. So if GC is the best academic fit and the girl is ok not playing as much as at another school then great, but otherwise why wouldn’t girls choose schools where they’d play more and perhaps have stronger academics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You are correct. They also had fast breaks but then would slow the play down to turn over the ball. Not sure what the strategy is, but it does not work for them. And none of them were aggressive on the goal. GC has 20+ girls that would start on any team. sJC has at most 8. They were no match for GC, but who is in this area??

Why would anyone choose a team that deep? Good for the program but there are other schools with better academic reputations and where talented players would actually play. It’s one thing to choose a college program knowing you might not play but care more about winning a championship but for high school I would think most players would rather just play on a competitive team.

Here we go again with this nonsense…

Not sure why it’s nonsense? The end game is college—with or without lacrosse and even with lacrosse these girls will have careers. So if GC is the best academic fit and the girl is ok not playing as much as at another school then great, but otherwise why wouldn’t girls choose schools where they’d play more and perhaps have stronger academics.

Oh I don’t know…maybe $50,000+ over 4 years? You have no sense of reality.