lol so true. |
Yeah, it's weird when people are chiming in from SF or Seattle, or talking about Lawrenceville admission results. Kids who would otherwise go to Langley are sometimes also looking at Potomac, Landon, Gonzaga, and to a lesser extent some of the more academic DMV privates like Sidwell or St. Albans or NCS. What happens at elite boarding schools really doesn't matter. |
So the OP sys Junior DC does not stand out in Public school. So should the younger ones be sent to one of those privates so they can stand out more from their peers? |
Honestly, I don't think the OP's kid goes to Langley, so I'm not that inclined to give specific advice. The line that every kid at Langley is gunning for T20 is laughable. The bottom half of Langley is not even thinking about T50, much less T20. |
DP. You public school parents are so defensive. I just don't understand it. |
So it should be easier to stand out at Langely? |
| Langley* |
Sigh, you also lack creativity. |
This is way too generic of a question. Langley has close to 600 kids in each class. The top 10 percent is 60 kids, which is almost as many as the entire graduating class at a school at like St. Albans. The top 50% at St. Albans (30 kids) are probably comparable to the top 5% at Langley (30 kids). It is just apples and oranges. This is a stupid way to pick a high school. |
|
Bay Area parent back again- one note.
The kids at our private school accepted their spots at the private colleges they were accepted to. Even though they were also excepted to one or both of Cal and UCLA. The drop off to the UC’s doesn’t happen until you get to Tufts for example. I suspect the private high schools result in higher yield for the T 20 (probably T30 and top SLAC’s) than the top public high schools. I don’t know whether that is part of the difference but it could be |
This. It's okay to be poor, PP. No one is judging you. You are the only one being judgemental. |
well it is how the OP wants to pick a HS. |
It seems the the answer is that it is about the same degree of difficulty. |
|
As I said before from my experience in the Bay Area- yes for the very top students but not for the next tier. Those kids from the public high schools don’t seem to get in to the top privates or Cal and UCLA. Look at the Stanley Zhong example- Gunn HS, was in the top 9% of his class but had at least one B in junior year and took stem AP’s but not the humanities side. Best acceptance was UC Davis. Similar kids from our local independent high schools (and there are several very good private high schools) have better/more choices.
I know nothing of Langley HS but what I do know is AO are assigned by region so the AO who reviews applicants from Langley also reviews the applicants from the local private high schools. Students in a geographic area are necessarily competing with each other . . |
Which is why I specifically noted what patterns I’d seen regionally from one top school but that set off an angry Langley parent. |