I could swear I used to be able to fit a regular small roller under the seat in front of me, like around 20 years ago. Is this just a false memory? I haven't any problems dealing with luggage now. It's not a complaint. I just find it peculiar that I seem to remember a different experience when I started flying, but I can't find any evidence of that online. I may just be getting old though. |
A very small roller may fit. Many airlines with seatback entertainment have boxes under the seats that provide the equipment for the screen.
Just put your bag in the overhead? |
the average legroom or pitch has decreased from a comfortable 35 inches to a cramped 28 inches, often found on low-cost carriers. Seat width has also shrunk by as much as four inches over the past 30 years, leaving many seats with a narrow 16-inch width.
https://www.travelpulse.com/news/airlines-airports/shrinking-seat-sizes-and-disappearing-legroom-impacting-airline-experience-for-americans#:~:text=Consider%20this%3A%20the%20average%20legroom,a%20narrow%2016%2Dinch%20width. Supposedly they're slowly starting to increase again. |
hey, I appreciate it, but like I said in the first post, I don't have a problem with how things work. I adapted just fine. I'm just trying to remember how it used to be, because I can't tell whether that memory is accurate. I think the post under you had it right. |
That's more like what I remember. A small roller would fit in front of my feet, and I'd tuck a small purse at the lower curve of my back when buckled in (mostly because it was more comfortable that way). Interesting that it's changing. The whole "gate lice"/juggling for line position seems tied to baggage issues and getting room for carry-ons. I'm sure the market will continue to adapt. Thanks, PP. |
(OP) PS: Also do appreciate this point. I'd forgotten about that change. |
Ha ha ridiculously overstated stats. No standard US airline has had economy legroom of 35 inches ever. 32 was standard 30 years ago, and now it's generally 31 or 30. Only Spirit/Frontier go below 30, and 28 in very uncommon in the US- although airlines like Ryanair have that on some planes. And again, there is no way that 20 inches was a normal economy width ever. The standard A320/737 seat width has not changed at all in probably 40 years. Have never seen a standard narrow body 737/A320 seat less than 17 inches width. |
If I dropped something on the floor in the past I could bend over and pick it up. Now I just bang my head on the tray in the seat back in front and have to remember to pick up the item at the end of the flight. |
I don't remember underseat space ever holding a normal roll on. Soft sided bags and back packs are about all they can handle. No doubt the space has gotten tighter given the entertainment equipment they've added. |
This is so obvious that this doesn't need to be instructed. But in saying this you actually are accusing the OP of asking a stupid question, which she is not. |
OP here. I just think I remember -- maybe 30 years ago? I'm in my 50s now -- that I was a little puzzled by why the flight attendants would direct you to put the larger bag up overhead and the smaller at your feet. My small-ish roller fir just fine under the seat in front of me, and that way I didn't have to lift something heavy. I do believe I was flying a lot in Canada at the time, so that may be it. |
OP. Hey, thanks. ![]() |
I flew Delta a lot at that time in the US. You definitely used to be able to fit rollers under the seats. |
THANK you. I really appreciate it. That's been nagging at me for awhile. |
A very tiny roller would fit under the seat. Think of a roller the size used for computer bags now. Normal carryon rollers, including EU size rollers, never fit. |