Be careful what you wish for Gray supporters

[Anonymous]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/31/gray-campaign-falls-short-on-foia-stance/?page=1

[Anonymous]

If that's all you have. I'll take it.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, I think someone said that when I voted for Fenty four years ago.

At least I remember people complaining about Sinclair Skinner even back then. Now he seems to be biting everyone in the ass. Linda Cropp, wherever you are, I apologize!

But back to the issue that was raised. I wonder what the Washington Times thinks Gray is hiding? What do you think he is hiding, OP? Or is it that you think he is sloppy?

[Anonymous]

It's too late to run "What is he hiding? Hmmmm.." stories. At this point we know enough about Gray. Innuendo attacks don't fly just ahead of the vote.

[Anonymous]

Really, who reads the Washington Times. Is that paper still around.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:Really, who reads the Washington Times. Is that paper still around.

Rev. Moon just bought it back for $1. Seriously.

[Anonymous]

He overpaid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He overpaid.

You misunderestimate the number of imbeciles out there in the wild. I read recently that Moon spent an estimated $1bn over the life of the paper to keep it afloat. One could argue that he--or at least the conservative movement--got their money's worth. More bang for his buck than the Kock brothers, or Coors for that matter.

[Anonymous]

"Koch" of course...

[Anonymous]

"misunderestimate" is not a word, unless you are GW Bush.

[Anonymous]

Just you wait. Give it another year or two. You're like Canute, standing on the strand.

[Anonymous]

14:52 again -- OP, I'm still waiting to hear what Gray is supposed to be hiding.