IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire Biden Ukraine cover story is collapsing. It turns out the Obama administration didn’t want to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma, but Biden went rogue. He fired Shokin, because Hunter asked him to and now the fired prosecutor is speaking out. He says he believes Biden was bribed by Burisma and if it wasn’t for Joe, Ukraine probably wouldn’t be at war with Russia today.

Another example of Joe being Joe.

You people are unbelievably dense and gullible. Every sentence you wrote is 100% false and easily refuted by any source from that time.

DP
You mean, refuted by the narrative that was promoted at the time.
Recent state department docs are proving that what pp wrote is correct. And, testimony by Hunter's partner.

Please provide evidence of this. The VP, who basically doesn't have any official duties except to be a heartbeat away from the Presidency, unilaterally did this, if I understand you correctly? Yeah, um, that seems to be another hot take from low information voters.

[Anonymous]

Obama was more focus on domestic issues and gave Joe many of the foreign policy issues. Many articles address this and even words by both men confirm it. Officially the VPs job is morr ceremony but that wasnt the case over the 8 years. Did Obama know about Biden Inc... I'm sure he did and let it happen. Why did he come to the WH for an unscheduled lunch this summer? The legacy of Obama.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The entire Biden Ukraine cover story is collapsing. It turns out the Obama administration didn’t want to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma, but Biden went rogue. He fired Shokin, because Hunter asked him to and now the fired prosecutor is speaking out. He says he believes Biden was bribed by Burisma and if it wasn’t for Joe, Ukraine probably wouldn’t be at war with Russia today.

Another example of Joe being Joe.

You people are unbelievably dense and gullible. Every sentence you wrote is 100% false and easily refuted by any source from that time.

DP
You mean, refuted by the narrative that was promoted at the time.
Recent state department docs are proving that what pp wrote is correct. And, testimony by Hunter's partner.

Please provide evidence of this. The VP, who basically doesn't have any official duties except to be a heartbeat away from the Presidency, unilaterally did this, if I understand you correctly? Yeah, um, that seems to be another hot take from low information voters.

https://nypost.com/2023/08/22/state-department-was-impressed-with-ex-prosecutor-biden-pressured-ukraine-to-fire-report/

Former President Barack Obama’s State Department and several other administration officials were happy enough with Ukraine’s former top prosecutor’s anti-corruption efforts to sign off on $1 billion in US aid weeks before a pressure campaign spearheaded by then-Vice President Joe Biden forced him from office, documents show.

The government memos, obtained by Just the News and released on Monday, contradict the prevailing narrative put forward by Democrats arguing that Biden’s threat in December 2015 to withhold US loan guarantees for Ukraine in exchange for the ouster of Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin from office was consistent with US policy goals.

Several officials in the weeks leading up to Biden’s December 2015 visit to Kyiv had said they were “impressed” with the “progress” Shokin’s office had made in the preceding months.

One of the documents setting forth conditions for the loans, drafted one month before the vice president’s trip, listed no issues with granting the funds and said nothing about firing the prosecutor.

[Anonymous]

Here you go, dense delusional gaslighter

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20191211/110331/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD046.pdf

[Anonymous]

[mastodon]

Anonymous wrote:Here you go, dense delusional gaslighter

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20191211/110331/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD046.pdf

And another contemporary source:
https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-shokin-resignation-approved/27641545.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[mastodon]

Anonymous wrote:Here you go, dense delusional gaslighter

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20191211/110331/HMKP-116-JU00-20191211-SD046.pdf

And another contemporary source:
https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-shokin-resignation-approved/27641545.html

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-ukraine-prosecutor-idAFKCN0WI1TU

[Anonymous]

Can someone explain how this isn’t as bad as it looks?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how this isn’t as bad as it looks?

No. Nobody legitimately can. Because it is worse than it looks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how this isn’t as bad as it looks?

No. Nobody legitimately can. Because it is worse than it looks.

Pp - well, I tried

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how this isn’t as bad as it looks?

The allegations about Shokin and Baturina are easily disproven. There is still no evidence of a crime other than Hunter’s taxes. Everything else is innuendo and conjecture based on misinformation. Read a legitimate source.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how this isn’t as bad as it looks?

The allegations about Shokin and Baturina are easily disproven. There is still no evidence of a crime other than Hunter’s taxes. Everything else is innuendo and conjecture based on misinformation. Read a legitimate source.

Thanks, but it looks bad based on legitimate sources like the NYT, CNN, etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how this isn’t as bad as it looks?

The allegations about Shokin and Baturina are easily disproven. There is still no evidence of a crime other than Hunter’s taxes. Everything else is innuendo and conjecture based on misinformation. Read a legitimate source.

Thanks, but it looks bad based on legitimate sources like the NYT, CNN, etc.

Name a crime supported by evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how this isn’t as bad as it looks?

The allegations about Shokin and Baturina are easily disproven. There is still no evidence of a crime other than Hunter’s taxes. Everything else is innuendo and conjecture based on misinformation. Read a legitimate source.

Thanks, but it looks bad based on legitimate sources like the NYT, CNN, etc.

Name a crime supported by evidence.

That’s why an impartial investigation is so important. I’m glad we’re working on that now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Obama was more focus on domestic issues and gave Joe many of the foreign policy issues. Many articles address this and even words by both men confirm it. Officially the VPs job is morr ceremony but that wasnt the case over the 8 years. Did Obama know about Biden Inc... I'm sure he did and let it happen. Why did he come to the WH for an unscheduled lunch this summer? The legacy of Obama.

You all keep using thjis right wing term, "Biden Inc"

There is no such thing, and the continued use simply makes you look stupid. I get it, it is short hand for * waves hands * all of this, but there is no there there. It is no different than Benghazi and her emailzzzzzz

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain how this isn’t as bad as it looks?

Because it isn't. Anyone can take a serious of unrelated events and try to tie them together and call it a thing, when in reality it is a conspiracy theory. That is what we have here. No different than John Podesta with "coded" language that really means a pedophile ring being run out of a non-existent basement at Comet Pizza. this is the same thing, boosted by russian trolls and bots and amplified on right wing media to distract you from the former president's men being rounded up for their coup attempt and trying to both sides the criming that took place in the Trump Administration.