Kane from Kaneshow divorcing and crying on air right now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have you guys seen P's birthday post about Sam? Why would he throw in that he was holding N's hand the first time he saw Sam?
Totally sign of I know I fucked up by saying way too much last Friday, so let me win back some points by saying please dont bash N and act like nothing ever happened.

I think he genuinely loved (still loves but will get over it in time) her and put it out there because that's how he feels. Don't think it was an apology or an "I screwed up" just more raw emotion. I just saw it too and thought it was odd but didn't read it that way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I do listen to the Kane show. I have heard bit & pieces about their life (on air from P&N) over the many years. I'm commenting as a listener AND as a person who has been thru an ugly divorce (with young children). I do not know either N or P.
1. P has made many comments about always letting N win an argument just to end it.Always came across as lovely to family.N came across as 'ugh don't bother me u peasant".
2. N has made rude condescending selfish comments to P. Not very lovingly.
3. Seems P was working his @ss off just to give N and girls a great life. N seems like it was/will never be enough. And believes she is entitled to things.

As a frequent listener I agree with most of your post except those 3 points... There is no way any listener of the show knows what nat is like from the few minutes she is on the air every now and again( compared to hearing Kane for hours and hours)... Especially when Kane frequently calls her after admitting that she is mad at him (news flash all couples get into fights, Kane just happens to call his wife after they get into one and that probably skews what people think of her, I have to add this before someone's chimes in saying how nat is always mad at him)...the fact that you have never read her blog just shows that you shouldn't be commenting on what N is like since you admittedly don't know much about her....I never saw her blog or other social media before Kane started this storm, but after glancing through it she seems like a great mother that works hard to make sure her daughters are stimulated ( yes being a SAHM is work)

I'm pretty sure if I called my spouse on air after fighting that morning they wouldn't speak to me very lovingly either lol...after reading her blog and other social media regarding their family life you can't honestly stand by those 3 points you made about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I'm the poster you quoted.

Perhaps but your post also came off strongly as "N did this and this and this " Following Kane's sequence of events...I agree we are all in the dark but common sense tends to suggest that those things did not happen since if it were true and she did run away with the kids and make them miss school etc than it is highly unlikely that N would still have custody of the kids this many months after the fact if she were in fact that unstable...adding into it the immediate retraction from the live recordings makes it seem more like Kane was just angry and venting and stretching the truth in the process. My hunch is he was told to take it down to try to avoid slander/defamation of character in the eventual court proceedings.

I think what the other poster was getting at is that taking your stuff and getting out while the other person is out of the house is a good tactic for somebody in an abusive relationship...as someone that works in the Heath field i can tell you one of the major reasons a person will stay in an abusive relationship is out of fear of retaliation if he/she tries to change the situation... If that is the case then grabbing everything and making a break for it while he isn't home is probably the safest bet...keep in mind that abuse comes in many forms not the least of which is emotional, so he didn't necessarily have to get physical..

You are right everyone is in the dark with what actually happened this is just a great way to pass the time for everyone trying to be dr Phil

You sound like you know Natasha and have an agenda to try to discredit Peter. Also, taking down the recording wouldn't avoid slander/defamation of character suits. He already said what he said to a wide audience. Plus, you are purposely being very literal in interpreting what he said. Saying the situation has been going on for three months doesn't mean she took the kids out of school for three months, doesn't mean she was in Florida for three months, etc. Your agenda seems to be to call him a liar by been extremely literal about the time line and what it means that the situation has been going on for three months, and then you throw in loose abuse allegations to try to discredit him further. You definitely don't sound like just another poster on the thread. You sound like someone with a vested interest in the outcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many SAHM are on here talking about N spending P's money while they're probably spending THEIR husband's money?
Woman are so ridiculously jealous its sickening. Like someone said before. It's THEIR money. Since when is it his and her money in a marriage unless you chose to keep seperate bank accounts.
I know all of you jealous SAHM's wish you had more money to spend on those nice boots you seen at Macy's.

Nat....shouldn't you be working on your blog post? Double check your grammar, too.

LOL!!!!!!

[Anonymous]

I know I'm WAY too invested in these people, but.....P's birthday post for Sam (and his posts about his daughters in general) show how much he loves them. I get the sense that he was kind of wild/a player when he was younger but that having kids really changed his life. I TRULY hope N doesn't use the kids as leverage and not let them see their dad

[Anonymous]

THIS LINK HAS THREE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY FOUR THOUSAND VIEWS!!!!!!!! Please, God Jeff, tell me this is not a record.

[Anonymous]

Let me start this by saying I am in NO way related to Natasha (friend, family, co-worker, acquaintance, etc). Never met her, never even seen her in person. I’m a 24 year old gal who somehow ended up reading her blog and really loved it. I read the whole thing like a book in about 3 days. I have no kids and I’m not married, but I liked reading her honesty. Grammar inaccuracies and all. I’ve written for a blog in the past and know how much time actually goes into it (a lot more than you’d think!). I also happen to think their kids are adorable so I loved seeing pics of them!

I don’t have any news to add, just thought I’d give my two cents after adamantly reading all 80 pages of this thread (agh, don’t tell anyone I know about this). It angers me every time I see someone say N is “spending HIS money” or just spends her days shopping for useless things. Have you all forgotten that being a SAHM means taking care of children? For those of you discrediting her life by assuming she isn’t a hard worker, or doesn’t deserve the life she has since she doesn’t work .. shame on you! I know you probably don’t want to hear it but having a SAHM as a kid is the greatest. My mom was a SAHM and it was incredible waving bye to her every morning and having her there to greet and play with me every afternoon after school. She actually raised me. No nannies, no baby-sitters. My dad didn’t work in radio, but his job caused him to be away, a LOT — like more than the average 40 hour/week office job (like P). I think N didn’t know what she wanted to do in her 20s (like 99% of 20-something year olds) and decided to be the stable parent in the relationship, just like P decided to be the stable bread-winner. BOTH are important jobs, Don’t discredit her life because she made a commitment to motherhood just because YOU decided to work. Not cool, man. Full-time motherhood is very hard work. Much harder than whatever job you’re at right now, allowing you to read the 80+ pages of this thread! I was exhausted at the end of every single one of my nannying days, and it’s half the work/pressure of being a full-time mom. I admire her and other SAHMs, as I know I probably won't do the same when I decide to have children. She may not be earning a salary, but her job is just as (if not more) important. Also, I wouldn’t say P is working so hard just for them .. obviously he likes caring for his family but he has also confessed to being a workaholic. I think he definitely chose work over N a lot.

Now that that's out of the way (sorry for the mouthful), I’m assuming because they have a history of very passionate fighting, his recent diagnoses, her own sickness, AND the stress that comes from being a full-time mom in a relationship where the other is always working (even when he’s at home) all led to their demise. Especially since she has a past of PPD. It’s sad, because on social media they appeared to be a perfect family, but I suppose it’s what they both wanted, so hopefully it leads them and their children to happier lives. So, I know it's easier to beat up on N because of the little info P provided us with, but I don't think attacking her life without perspective is the kinda gossip that's worth reading! Am I right?

In the meantime, I look forward to N's return to blogging. IMO, it's much more earnest (thus more enjoyable) than the Kane show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I do listen to the Kane show. I have heard bit & pieces about their life (on air from P&N) over the many years. I'm commenting as a listener AND as a person who has been thru an ugly divorce (with young children). I do not know either N or P.
1. P has made many comments about always letting N win an argument just to end it.Always came across as lovely to family.N came across as 'ugh don't bother me u peasant".
2. N has made rude condescending selfish comments to P. Not very lovingly.
3. Seems P was working his @ss off just to give N and girls a great life. N seems like it was/will never be enough. And believes she is entitled to things.
I will not ever read nor follow her blog. She comes across as 'starts a lot of things but never finishes'. Besides the divorce is between them. I am only a listener.
(Intern john-who is not really an intern- needs to go. He seems to @ss kiss P so he can take over the show and get rid of P. Now he wants to rename Loser line to John's justice. I am starting to channel surf more and more on my commute.) Soo tired of hearing about Dani pumping every day. Rose offers no value just minimally offers a younger view.

Some say N is a golddigger. Truth will be shown once the divorce is over. How much support does she need??? Her true colors will show.
Side note- buying several $800 gift cards is not normal nor is taking pics from frames. That is being vindictive. Attorneys will tell both of them that gift cards are joint money. So amount she bought/took will be deducted from her "share".

I agree with ppl who say P shared too much. Maybe he shared due to raw emotion/ being pissed.
I would open a new account without N's name so she can't take any more money.
I would also put $ into a new account for each girl. This way P is planning for their futu[google]re thus N can't claim she needs funds for girls down the road.

As for a parent going out of state- leads to abandonment 'claims' in court. My ex took kids out of state. Attorneys told him to get his @ss back asap.

As for kids... remember your kids are learning from your behavior. If you use your kids as pawns, they Will see what you are doing. And end up hating you for it.

I am also a listener (switch between 95.5, 93.9, 99.5 and NPR) and just by chance heard the entire thing live on air. I also have a not so great impression of N based on both her blog and what P has said on air about their relationship over the years (I have been listening on and off since he started in DC, probably around 11 years ago). N always seemed entitled and materialistic. P always presented it as being their money and went on and on about how they are an equal team and how hard her job as a SAHM is. Having said that I do think he can be controlling at times related to his OCD issues. However, I believe he was truly committed (perhaps too much) to the partnership and was blindsided by what happened. I also was always annoyed when P would make comments about 'i married for life' and found him to be naive because you never know what the future holds. I wish the best for them both but must admit I wonder how N will fare after the divorce. She is extremely beautiful, but let's face it as an older divorced mom of two may not have quite the number of options she was probably used to when they got together. By all appearances P is a loving father, supportive partner, and great provider (based on an earlier comment in the thread) which is not always easy to find.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok. I know this is off topic buuuttt....i actually never saw a pic of Rose until now. So, from a dental perspective, she would be much more attractive with gingival repositioning. In other words...she has such a gummy smile that it makes her look so much older.

Agreed. Her tooth to gum ratio is way off, you'd think she could afford a little dental work. It makes her way unattractive

*runs away to Google Rose*

OMG! she needs to smile with her mouth closed. I'm sorry, I'm a horrible person but that was too much for me on a Tuesday.

YIKES! she has a face for radio.

This is terribly rude and petty. As a thread that started about P and N, to be commenting on Rose's looks is just mean. She is an incredibly sweet person, and all you're saying is that her worth is determined by how she looks. I bet you all could use some "work" too.

She has the personality of a nickel.

Best reply of this whole 80 paged post.

[Anonymous]

ALL I WANT TO KNOW IS WHO HAS THE AUDIO AND WHEN WILL THAT BE POSTED ON LIKE YOUTUBE[i][u]

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:THIS LINK HAS THREE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY FOUR THOUSAND VIEWS!!!!!!!! Please, God Jeff, tell me this is not a record.

Right now, this thread has the 4th most views in DCUM history. See this list from not long ago:

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/472284.page

Since that list was made, the thread about the family being murdered and their house being set on fire moved into the number 2 position and pushed the rest down.

[Anonymous]

Danni is a fake ass bitch.

[Anonymous]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasocial_interaction

please just stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasocial_interaction

please just stop.

I don't think any of us are under the impression that we are "friends" with P and N or that we have a one-sided relationship. It's just gossip, curiosity, and speculation based on a public figure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasocial_interaction

please just stop.

Please just stop posting.