Biden can turn things around if...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump is gaining momentum and the current rioting in major cities plays to a conservative strongpoint: law and order.
Joe needs to reverse Trump’s momentum and fast, but what can he do?
Suddenly condemning the riots and pledging law and order may not play to his most impassioned supporters

Crisp and clear undergraduate student loan forgiveness for all low and middle class families. The plan his team put out is worthless -- forgiveness after 20 FREAKING YEARS?! Gee thanks. Which bankers and loan service provider lobbyists wrote that worthless crap.

Exec order forgiving all Federally held 2- and 4-year student loans immediately. I think that sum total is in the $500B range.

Sure, what’s another half-trillion when you’re talking about a nine trillion dollar green new deal program. How will we pay for all this, especially after the green new deal crushes the energy sector of the economy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The betting odds on Real Clear Politics make me really nervous. Last week it was like 60/40 Biden and today it's 51/49. Vegas thinks the race has tightened significantly. They often know best...

Of course it has. Rioters are tearing the country down and Joe and Kamala are cheering them on. How exactly did you think sane people would respond to that?

Hey dummy. Joe has repeatedly condemned violence and rioting. Also he does not want to defund the police. stating it once again.

Repeatedly? No. Delayed and passively? Perhaps.

+1

Repeatedly? Sorry, take your disinformation campaign elsewhere. He jumped in because of the polls. Not a word was said during the FNC. Moreover, Bigot Kamala, in a June interview with Stephen Colbert, said they will continue even after the election and should not let up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The betting odds on Real Clear Politics make me really nervous. Last week it was like 60/40 Biden and today it's 51/49. Vegas thinks the race has tightened significantly. They often know best...

Of course it has. Rioters are tearing the country down and Joe and Kamala are cheering them on. How exactly did you think sane people would respond to that?

Hey dummy. Joe has repeatedly condemned violence and rioting. Also he does not want to defund the police. stating it once again.

Repeatedly? No. Delayed and passively? Perhaps.

+1

Repeatedly? Sorry, take your disinformation campaign elsewhere. He jumped in because of the polls. Not a word was said during the FNC. Moreover, Bigot Kamala, in a June interview with Stephen Colbert, said they will continue even after the election and should not let up.

Here, from three months ago, it's even in the second paragraph so you don't have to hunt for it: https://medium.com/@JoeBiden/we-are-a-nation-furious-at-injustice-9dcffd81978f

Sorry to interrupt your lies with truth

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The betting odds on Real Clear Politics make me really nervous. Last week it was like 60/40 Biden and today it's 51/49. Vegas thinks the race has tightened significantly. They often know best...

Of course it has. Rioters are tearing the country down and Joe and Kamala are cheering them on. How exactly did you think sane people would respond to that?

Trumpsters are sane? Bizarro universe indeed.

Name-calling never is a winning strategy.

It works perfectly well for your Orange Tub-o-Lard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump’s supporters are certainly loud but are they all that numerous? Though if reports are to be believed they are crushing Biden on social media.

I don't see any Trump signs at all in my neighborhood this election. There were at least 4 of them in 2016 within 3 blocks of my house. My parents in the midwest have reported the same -- no Trump signs to be seen.

I don’t know how many times this has to be said: political signs are no measure of who might win. Especially in this climate. Putting out a yard sign - for either candidate - is just asking for it to be stolen or defaced. No one I know is interested in signaling their political preference.

Weird. In 2016, there were zero campaign signs in my neighborhood. Now, we have several Biden, BLM and hate has no home here signs. If my neighbors are like me, they didn't care enough in the past to place a sign, but now they feel they MUST make sure trump doesn't get four(+) more years.

Excuse me, but BLM is not hate? Are you nuts? Have you seen the looting? Have you seen the shootings? Have you heard the hate speech? They hide behind a legitimate sentiment to execute what is tantamount to a coup?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The betting odds on Real Clear Politics make me really nervous. Last week it was like 60/40 Biden and today it's 51/49. Vegas thinks the race has tightened significantly. They often know best...

Of course it has. Rioters are tearing the country down and Joe and Kamala are cheering them on. How exactly did you think sane people would respond to that?

Hey dummy. Joe has repeatedly condemned violence and rioting. Also he does not want to defund the police. stating it once again.

Repeatedly? No. Delayed and passively? Perhaps.

+1

Repeatedly? Sorry, take your disinformation campaign elsewhere. He jumped in because of the polls. Not a word was said during the FNC. Moreover, Bigot Kamala, in a June interview with Stephen Colbert, said they will continue even after the election and should not let up.

Not one word during the convention. Save it for the Politburo.
Here, from three months ago, it's even in the second paragraph so you don't have to hunt for it: https://medium.com/@JoeBiden/we-are-a-nation-furious-at-injustice-9dcffd81978f

Sorry to interrupt your lies with truth

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The betting odds on Real Clear Politics make me really nervous. Last week it was like 60/40 Biden and today it's 51/49. Vegas thinks the race has tightened significantly. They often know best...

Of course it has. Rioters are tearing the country down and Joe and Kamala are cheering them on. How exactly did you think sane people would respond to that?

Hey dummy. Joe has repeatedly condemned violence and rioting. Also he does not want to defund the police. stating it once again.

Repeatedly? No. Delayed and passively? Perhaps.

+1

Repeatedly? Sorry, take your disinformation campaign elsewhere. He jumped in because of the polls. Not a word was said during the FNC. Moreover, Bigot Kamala, in a June interview with Stephen Colbert, said they will continue even after the election and should not let up.

Here, from three months ago, it's even in the second paragraph so you don't have to hunt for it: https://medium.com/@JoeBiden/we-are-a-nation-furious-at-injustice-9dcffd81978f

Sorry to interrupt your lies with truth

Not one word during the convention. Save it for the Politburo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The betting odds on Real Clear Politics make me really nervous. Last week it was like 60/40 Biden and today it's 51/49. Vegas thinks the race has tightened significantly. They often know best...

Of course it has. Rioters are tearing the country down and Joe and Kamala are cheering them on. How exactly did you think sane people would respond to that?

Trumpsters are sane? Bizarro universe indeed.

Name-calling never is a winning strategy.

It works perfectly well for your Orange Tub-o-Lard.

OK I was the P, and even I have to say that was pretty funny. Well done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump’s supporters are certainly loud but are they all that numerous? Though if reports are to be believed they are crushing Biden on social media.

I don't see any Trump signs at all in my neighborhood this election. There were at least 4 of them in 2016 within 3 blocks of my house. My parents in the midwest have reported the same -- no Trump signs to be seen.

I don’t know how many times this has to be said: political signs are no measure of who might win. Especially in this climate. Putting out a yard sign - for either candidate - is just asking for it to be stolen or defaced. No one I know is interested in signaling their political preference.

Who, in this intolerant time, would put a lawn sign up? Their house would be attacked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump’s supporters are certainly loud but are they all that numerous? Though if reports are to be believed they are crushing Biden on social media.

I don't see any Trump signs at all in my neighborhood this election. There were at least 4 of them in 2016 within 3 blocks of my house. My parents in the midwest have reported the same -- no Trump signs to be seen.

I don’t know how many times this has to be said: political signs are no measure of who might win. Especially in this climate. Putting out a yard sign - for either candidate - is just asking for it to be stolen or defaced. No one I know is interested in signaling their political preference.

Weird. In 2016, there were zero campaign signs in my neighborhood. Now, we have several Biden, BLM and hate has no home here signs. If my neighbors are like me, they didn't care enough in the past to place a sign, but now they feel they MUST make sure trump doesn't get four(+) more years.

Excuse me, but BLM is not hate? Are you nuts? Have you seen the looting? Have you seen the shootings? Have you heard the hate speech? They hide behind a legitimate sentiment to execute what is tantamount to a coup?

No because the idea is much more than the organization. My neighbors have a sign. They aren't members of BLM, don't go to protests and don't approve of riots or coups. Like a lot of us, they just think nobody should die like George Floyd. They don't think that's controversial and neither do I.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The betting odds on Real Clear Politics make me really nervous. Last week it was like 60/40 Biden and today it's 51/49. Vegas thinks the race has tightened significantly. They often know best...

Of course it has. Rioters are tearing the country down and Joe and Kamala are cheering them on. How exactly did you think sane people would respond to that?

Hey dummy. Joe has repeatedly condemned violence and rioting. Also he does not want to defund the police. stating it once again.

Repeatedly? No. Delayed and passively? Perhaps.

+1

Repeatedly? Sorry, take your disinformation campaign elsewhere. He jumped in because of the polls. Not a word was said during the FNC. Moreover, Bigot Kamala, in a June interview with Stephen Colbert, said they will continue even after the election and should not let up.

Here, from three months ago, it's even in the second paragraph so you don't have to hunt for it: https://medium.com/@JoeBiden/we-are-a-nation-furious-at-injustice-9dcffd81978f

Sorry to interrupt your lies with truth

Your link shows this one line, which you helpfully highlighted:

"The act of protesting should never be allowed to overshadow the reason we protest."

Hard to read this as a condemnation of violence and rioting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The betting odds on Real Clear Politics make me really nervous. Last week it was like 60/40 Biden and today it's 51/49. Vegas thinks the race has tightened significantly. They often know best...

Of course it has. Rioters are tearing the country down and Joe and Kamala are cheering them on. How exactly did you think sane people would respond to that?

Hey dummy. Joe has repeatedly condemned violence and rioting. Also he does not want to defund the police. stating it once again.

Repeatedly? No. Delayed and passively? Perhaps.

+1

Repeatedly? Sorry, take your disinformation campaign elsewhere. He jumped in because of the polls. Not a word was said during the FNC. Moreover, Bigot Kamala, in a June interview with Stephen Colbert, said they will continue even after the election and should not let up.

Here, from three months ago, it's even in the second paragraph so you don't have to hunt for it: https://medium.com/@JoeBiden/we-are-a-nation-furious-at-injustice-9dcffd81978f

Sorry to interrupt your lies with truth

Your link shows this one line, which you helpfully highlighted:

"The act of protesting should never be allowed to overshadow the reason we protest."

Hard to read this as a condemnation of violence and rioting.

Read the previous paragraph and get your eyes checked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The betting odds on Real Clear Politics make me really nervous. Last week it was like 60/40 Biden and today it's 51/49. Vegas thinks the race has tightened significantly. They often know best...

Of course it has. Rioters are tearing the country down and Joe and Kamala are cheering them on. How exactly did you think sane people would respond to that?

Hey dummy. Joe has repeatedly condemned violence and rioting. Also he does not want to defund the police. stating it once again.

Repeatedly? No. Delayed and passively? Perhaps.

+1

Repeatedly? Sorry, take your disinformation campaign elsewhere. He jumped in because of the polls. Not a word was said during the FNC. Moreover, Bigot Kamala, in a June interview with Stephen Colbert, said they will continue even after the election and should not let up.

Here, from three months ago, it's even in the second paragraph so you don't have to hunt for it: https://medium.com/@JoeBiden/we-are-a-nation-furious-at-injustice-9dcffd81978f

Sorry to interrupt your lies with truth

Your link shows this one line, which you helpfully highlighted:

"The act of protesting should never be allowed to overshadow the reason we protest."

Hard to read this as a condemnation of violence and rioting.

Read the previous paragraph and get your eyes checked.

Yep--you're right--was misled by the highlighting. Here is the paragraph:

Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not. Violence that guts and shutters businesses that serve the community is not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The betting odds on Real Clear Politics make me really nervous. Last week it was like 60/40 Biden and today it's 51/49. Vegas thinks the race has tightened significantly. They often know best...

Of course it has. Rioters are tearing the country down and Joe and Kamala are cheering them on. How exactly did you think sane people would respond to that?

Hey dummy. Joe has repeatedly condemned violence and rioting. Also he does not want to defund the police. stating it once again.

Repeatedly? No. Delayed and passively? Perhaps.

+1

Repeatedly? Sorry, take your disinformation campaign elsewhere. He jumped in because of the polls. Not a word was said during the FNC. Moreover, Bigot Kamala, in a June interview with Stephen Colbert, said they will continue even after the election and should not let up.

Here, from three months ago, it's even in the second paragraph so you don't have to hunt for it: https://medium.com/@JoeBiden/we-are-a-nation-furious-at-injustice-9dcffd81978f

Sorry to interrupt your lies with truth

Your link shows this one line, which you helpfully highlighted:

"The act of protesting should never be allowed to overshadow the reason we protest."

Hard to read this as a condemnation of violence and rioting.

Read the previous paragraph and get your eyes checked.

Yep--you're right--was misled by the highlighting. Here is the paragraph:

Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not. Violence that guts and shutters businesses that serve the community is not.

Thank you for checking. I really mean that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump’s supporters are certainly loud but are they all that numerous? Though if reports are to be believed they are crushing Biden on social media.

I don't see any Trump signs at all in my neighborhood this election. There were at least 4 of them in 2016 within 3 blocks of my house. My parents in the midwest have reported the same -- no Trump signs to be seen.

I don’t know how many times this has to be said: political signs are no measure of who might win. Especially in this climate. Putting out a yard sign - for either candidate - is just asking for it to be stolen or defaced. No one I know is interested in signaling their political preference.

Weird. In 2016, there were zero campaign signs in my neighborhood. Now, we have several Biden, BLM and hate has no home here signs. If my neighbors are like me, they didn't care enough in the past to place a sign, but now they feel they MUST make sure trump doesn't get four(+) more years.

Excuse me, but BLM is not hate? Are you nuts? Have you seen the looting? Have you seen the shootings? Have you heard the hate speech? They hide behind a legitimate sentiment to execute what is tantamount to a coup?

No because the idea is much more than the organization. My neighbors have a sign. They aren't members of BLM, don't go to protests and don't approve of riots or coups. Like a lot of us, they just think nobody should die like George Floyd. They don't think that's controversial and neither do I.

Again, the sentiment, the message, is legitimate. Who could not support it, but that’s not the point. BLM, the organization, is a different matter altogether. You would do well to read their manifesto and the manifesto of each of their affiliate organizations. You may not be so comfortable with your statement, “the idea is much more than the organization.”