Some charters (MV, TR) require kids to wear shirts bearing the school’s name or logo. |
Its also not any cheaper. I find the thrift stores more than what I pay new and most of the clothing is worn looking. I pay $3-5 new for jeans for my son (up to size 18) and same for shirts. I pay $15 or so for sneakers when I see a good price but the next size up. You can do it off season on uniforms if no logo or specific requirements but most have specific requirements. |
That's kinda sad for your kid assuming you can afford it. |
No, most don't. I don't know any DCPSes with specific requirements and that's what this thread is about. Charters make their own rules. |
Poor, unfortunate homely kid. Stop being so cheap! I bet you’ve bought yourself new clothes in the past 12 years. |
Hardly. How unfortunate that you feel the need to fall into consumerism and purchase new clothes every year. Because people like you exist, I get clothes all the time with tags still on them for a fraction of the price as you buy brand new. My kid and I are very well dressed. Thrifting and buying second hand does not equate to being homely. We are also doing our part to save the planet. |
|
I hope they keep uniforms, I’m,pretty sure some school already don’t have them. Working in a title 1 there’s definitely a difference in clothing.
If you want your child to look stylish there’s shoes, etc. One of my students walked in with little cat Charlotte Olympia shoes and I’m pretty sure I was one of the only people who could tell they’re like $300+ but I’m a sucker for shoes lol |
I have to buy uniform clothes more than once a year to deal with growing kids. They also have preferences for materials, fit, style within the uniform standard. We wouldn't qualify for free nor would we accept if offered. Just because we can afford it doesn't mean it's where are resources belong or that we should be coerced to [...wait for it...] CONSUME! more overall clothing to fit school requirements. |