Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
You had no problem believing all those women who accused Bill Clinton from years ago. |
Um... no.
|
|
I'd argue there's a difference between Hillary and Melania. Hillary stuck by Bill Clinton for political reasons and was also part of the effort to demean the women accusing Bill Clinton of sexism or propositions. She was part of the Clinton machine one way or another. The same machine that sacrificed all ethics and values for political gains.
Melania, as far as I can tell, has no political game to play. She never wanted the role. She has no further ambitions. And she's been one-upping the Donald in subtle ways over the past two years. After all, this was the woman when asked what her First Lady platform would be, responded by saying: attacking cyber-bullying! Come on, this was not unintentional. |
Malania has the money game to play. You get more as an current wife than Ex. |
|
I wouldn't be happy either. How many times did she have unprotected sex with him after Trump had his Stormy nights?
ewwwwwww |
| This is an unseemly topic to discuss on a public forum. I call for moderator review of this content. |
Ole Bill had strange ways of showing his respect...just ask Colin Powell about Bill's behavior with "bimbos." Don't know about you, but that's certainly not how I'd want my husband or significant other treating me. |
So money is less offensive than politics as far as motivation is concerned is what you are saying |
The blame rests squarely on your president. |
Melania is an enabler who is also an Obama birther. She deserves all the scorn coming her way. The whole family is utterly vile except Barron. |
Chelsea had the same parenting examples and she seems to have turned out ok. |
Snowflake. Go clutch your pearls. |
Of course I was concerned about Chelsea during that time. What a strange comment. |
+1 I find it so amusing that the same people defending Bill Clinton's womanizing are the very ones lambasting Trump for doing the same thing. I just can't take liberals seriously. |
No one can. It’s not a valid political philosophy. |