Do you want a gold star or something? Do you get off on looking down your nose at people? These programs exist to help people when they need it. Why should anyone be ashamed to take help if they qualify for it? I have a close family member who left an abusive relationship with a baby. She needed EBT until she could get back on her feet. It doesnt mean she didn't have any pride. She needed to feed her kid. I wish people could try a little bit of compassion instead of being so nasty. |
No, but I and the other poster (at least one) have pointed out that not only is there no recognition of the effort put forth by people who make their own way - but they're actually put down for it! Sorry, but while I understand that people need help, SOME credit should go to people who manage it on their own. Instead, they're attacked. When instances are pointed out where people are exploiting the system, they're defended. It's the upside-down world of liberals where responsible, self-sufficient people are criticized, and people who are on government assistance are almost applauded by comparison. I don't look down on those who go on programs, but yes....I do admire the people who want to make it on their own. |
Yes, they used to. Now the party is full of clowns and lizards. It is really sad how the GOP has been destroyed. |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the time limit extends only to childless adults between 18 and 60. If you have children or are over 60, you can stay on SNAP indefinitely. |
So you do want a gold star. You are like the good son in the prodigal son parable. It is okay to help your brother. There is love/room for you too. Some need more help than others. It is good that you could do it on your own and it is good that there is help for those that need it. |
Exactly. I admire those who do it on their own but there's no need to play the martyr. The help was there if you wanted it. You chose not to take it. |
I am the woman who posted about the ER - my reason for not taking assistance is bolded. Brought it to the back of the bus for you. |
I have a friend, who happens to be a conservative fundamentalist christian--has 8 kids with DH--and gets EBT. And has an iphone. And dines at Golden Corral. Wonder if OP saw her? They will be voting for Trump, according to her facebook page.
Her wealthier parents subsidize the luxuries and pay for private christian school for the kids. |
I see this every year at the Salvation Army Angel Tree Distribution. There I am with my family looking hot and disheveled, dragging out bags of new selected gifts and bicycles to mom who have been to the beauty salon that morning, have decorated fingernails two inches long, makeup, tight new clothes, boots, new purses and better iphones than I use. In fact they don't even put down the phone to bother to thank us - the donors to the salvation army - nor do they even respond when I wish them a "Merry Christmas". Most, if they check their backs, complain that the microwaved they asked for it is not in there. I'm done with the attitude of entitlement. ANd yes all of these moms are perfectly capable of working from what I can observe. |
So she has wealthy (or wealthier) parents who can pay for private school for her eight kids - and then underwrite life's luxuries as well - while the taxpayers fund the basics of living? That's not what EBT is for - for middle-class taxpayers to cover your necessities so money your parents allocate can pay for things the middle class can't afford. And for all you liberal do-gooders who say it's none of my business how she spends her "other" money, it is when she spends "my" ("our") money for her basics. I'll give an example. A woman I know has a dsughter (the daughter's in her 40s) who lives paycheck to paycheck, so when her car broke down, she said she didn't have the $1300 to fix it. She told her mother, saying she needed the car to get to work, buy groceries, you know - the basics - and the mother (who herself didn't have a lot extra to spare) gave her the money so she could cover her daily needs. Three weeks later, the woman flew to California for a vacation. The reason she was able to enjoy that luxury was because she didn't have to spend her OWN money on the car. Her mother was furious when she found out. |
I agree. It's amazing how other people become practically enraged when a financially responsible citizen criticizes the people her taxes support for how they spend "their" money - and comments on how they live a better lifestyle than a new college grad in her "salad days." (I'm the one who posted how I struggled with the bills in my 20s, while the teenager with the baby, on assistance, lived in an apartment three times the size of mine and dressed to the nines every day.) And what makes it worse, as you observe, is the absolute entitlement they have. |
I had the same experience with distributing "angel tree" gifts. (Not sure it was the Salvation Army program....it was similar, though.) It was more than 20 years ago, so I don't remember the logistics of how we did the distribution, but I know that we (the individual gift-givers) actually handed our gifts to the specific families. (We had been given a list of wishes from each family, and some of the items they were asking for were a fortune. I stuck with the more modest gifts for a fsmily of three children and ended up spending about $100.) On "distribution day," we handed out the gifts - and as I gave a big Meeey Christmas to each of the kids, they took the gift and left. No smile. No thank you. Nothing. And the mother was with the kids, of course, and SHE didn't even say thank you. They just figured that they're poor, I'm "rich," and they're entitled. |
This is why I stopped contributing to charities in this area. Most of those toys and gifts are re-sold for things the mothers want because the children receive so much through other sources. Through the Salvation Army I found other charities in less affluent areas where the gifts stay with the children. I am also involved with a local charity which allows me to earmark donations for things like medicine rather than rent or food. Recipients charity shop and know how to get food first, then payment of utility bills, followed by rent, school supplies and weekend food backpacks and last medicine. I earmark the money for medicine because the pharmacies are paid directly Donations are also more likely to go to people who are not covered by government or charity programs. |
I'm the PP. Yes, I stopped with the angel tree gifts after that experience 20 years ago. (I started giving to local homeless shelters instead, and now I also like to give to veterans' organizations.) But what you say about the mothers selling their kids' gifts for their own wants (since the kids already get from multiple sources) is infuriating. Call me naive, but it never occurred to me the recipients of charity gifts scammed people like that. |
It's important to their world view, political beliefs, and sense of self that the recipients of government assistance be blameless folks who just happen to be down on their luck. Evidence that challenges this notion makes them very upset. |