That is exactly why we went for piece of mind. I think they pick a select group of kids/parents and go out of their way to help those who have been with them for years. Mary is probably better about it. I had heard it is a service they provide but I think either only Mary does it or it is something they did years ago as they used to practice together before he went to Vanderbilt. We went to have an outsider review what we and the providers were doing to make sure we were doing everything we could for our child and see if they had any adjustments or suggestions to do it in a way better for our child. |
You’re right that getting pulled during recess or specials is not going to happen. They aren’t allowed. Specials may seem like throwaway classes but they are a mandatory part of the curriculum and are basically impossible to make up because they are only once a week. They are not allowed to just not give your child part of the curriculum. And they are not going to take away his social/break time at recess to give services, either. I’ve heard of social supports during recess, but never missing it entirely and I think that’s not a reasonable expectation. |
A "full evaluator" is almost always a neuropsychologist, not a special in language disorders. An SLP will be a specialist in language disorders, but will typically be not a full evaluator. The Camaratas are SLPs by training and the majority of their experience. I think National Speech takes insurance. KKI definitely does, and they have people who can evaluate almost anything. |
Only dr. C can "fully evaluate." His wife isn't certified to this. SLPs can do full evaluations, but they need special certification, which most do not. |
| Also pp, pysychologists can do full evaluations. |
Well that's illegal. All you need to do is not sign an IEP. You do not need to pay anyone money to do this. It's your right. If th school isn't following the IEP that's also illegal. If your kid is doing well you and the school isn't following an IEP, just don't sign. |
What exactly are you looking for? |
We were told that we didn't need to sign it. I know from everything I've read here it is all wrong but my energy is better focusing on my child than focusing on a system that doesn't care. Maybe I should take you to my next IEP. You may be more helpful than anyone.
|
Back to this. OP, give up on the Camarata's as they are not the right fit now. You need to find a better SLP fit and interview a bunch. Ours did all kinds of things including reading comprehension. If your child is struggling that much it does sound like something more, such as autism at this point. I would get him into speech with an SLP who can also do a multi-approach including reading comprehension, find a reading specialist as it gets much harder in 3rd with far more demands on reading comprehension and do workbooks at home to address it. This isn't just an expressive issue. If it were your child could change topics easier but will probably have a lot of pauses and need more time to think through the answer or just get stuck. I agree with neuropsych parents at this point because of the reading comprehension issues to get a full one done for the educational component but also get a full language assessment done, maybe at one of the local universities. Your child might also like speech better at a University where the student SLP's can make it more fun. Also, remember just because a child tests out of receptive issues meeting low average it doesn't mean that they will not struggle with them longer term. Its just once it hits low average, schools no longer recognize it as an issue even though it is. I would expect "normal conversations" but that goes a little beyond a regular expensive issue at this point. It is more around 5-6 for kids. |
She generally refers people to her husband if they need or want that testing. She did for us. Either way, they've been twice and they need another perspective. National speech is good as is Maryland. But, they need more than an speech evaluation. They need a speech evaluation but they need full testing at this point. |
This is not about a child's receptive language or reading skills. This kid may have a language disorder but being unable to interact with peers is a big problem at age 8. This could be autism, selective mutism, anxiety, OCD. This pp needs an evaluation that's more comprehensive than speech. |
Receptive language can interfere with the expressive and ability to speak. It sounds like autism or a language disorder. At this point it sounds more like autism than a language disorder if child is 8. It doesn't sound like selective mutism as child is talking or OCD nor anxiety. Articulating what you are reading is common in kids with language disorders. But, what isn't common is the random comments that don't belong anywhere. |
Random? I don't disagree that receptive and expressive abilities influence one another, but a kid who can play with his brother but can or will not initiate/communicate with his peers could definitely have selective mutism, anxiety, or OCD. Have a language disorder or autism doesn't preclude any of these. Bottom line: no one can diagnose your kid over the internet. That's why the pp with the 8 year old needs to get a neuropsychological evaluation pronto. |
My child is very funny about who he will talk to. Its not selective mutism but an understanding who will be accepting and who will not be. Its pretty typical with kids I know with language issues. My child is very different at home, private speech, and other places. With some teachers he has talked non-stop, with others he barely speaks at all. Kids are good at gauging reactions, especially at that age. Having a language disorder autism doesn't preclude any of those, but playing with a sibling is not equal to his peers, especially with a 3 year age difference. Either way, I agree they need a full neuropsych and not with with the Camarata's but I would do a separate language evaluation as well. |