|
Some parents have unrealistic expectations of their children and think that anyone who tries to hold their child back is really cheating them in some way.
HOpefully very few of those parents will apply to BASIS. If they do, there will be trouble when their kids can't meet the academic expectations |
It's not hard to understand. The law is that every public school has to accept every student and then accommodate that student's needs. It's pretty simple. If you want an exclusive school, you have choices: 1) private, 2) magnet. Charter exclusivity is not an option. Why is this simple fact (presented over and over and over and OVER again) so difficult for you to comprehend? And, considering those circumstances (you being so dim) what makes you think your snowflake has the intellectual aptitude for a rigorous education anyway? |
PP, please cite the law that requires DC charter schools to accommodate every student's needs. I have been unable to find it, but would love to read it. Thanks |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_Restrictive_Environment
Schools are required to educate students in a least restrictive environment. That means that if a student goes to Basis and has a learning disability then the student is still a student at that school. They must educate the child and can't counsel them out or deny them education. It is federal and District law. |
|
Seems to me there are some persistent trollers here, no doubt directly invested in some other part of the system who are intimidated by the fact that finally schools like Basis will finally be meeting the unmet needs of DC students who have college potential.
|
I agree It is as if they only want "one size fits all" education that is geared toward the lowest common denominator and no choices in DC.
If there were no choices in DC, then 41% of the DC student population would be stuck with lousy DC public schools. |
Exactly! I am not interested in sending my child to any Ivy but I want him to be educated. I grew up overseas and went to various schools in several countries. I had good teachers and not so good teachers. However the emphasis was always on teaching and learning. There was transparency in what was expected from students. There was transparency in what the lesson the teacher was presenting. Every time I try to know what is being done in my child's classroom, I get a very vague answer. Every time I ask the teachers for some thing specific, it's some general long range plan I hear about. Homework is quite scant. And then, there are so many of these fancy graphic organizers to fill out and cut and paste activities and so on. Everything seems to be subjective. I don't understand why upper elementary has to have such little content. No wonder many children are learning next to nothing in school. BASIS seems to have a clear objective -- educate kids and set high expectations. Any kid without too many learning disabilities should be able to make it, if enough time is spent studying to master the material. Is that so bad? |
PP, the least restrictive environment principle only applies to students with a documented disability covered by IDEA. Earlier you, or another PP, posted the following:
In response, I posted the following:
IDEA does not require DC charter schools to accommodate the needs of all students, only of those students with disabilities covered by IDEA. Can you cite a law that applies to all students? |
Nobody's intimidated, hon. Latin and Deal have been around for a while. People are just very clear on the fact that it is not legal to counsel a student out for academic under-performance. |
So say you. Can you offer any authority for this claim? |
As I hear it, Latin's one of the schools losing a lot of students to Basis. |
+1000 |