DC bike group says fewer now riding bikes to work than in 2012 (?!?!)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between the bus bump outs and the bikes lanes, Columbia Rd in AM has been destroyed for cars. It is absolutely awful, but I suppose that was their intention. It seems less safe for bikes now.

Seems sad what DDOT did there. All it does is permanently reduce the number of people who will go there.

DDOT: Helping Washingtonians rediscover Virginia and Maryland.

The economy is absolutely booming, and pretty much every neighborhood in DC is a pale shadow of what it was 10 years ago. So many empty storefronts, so few people on the streets. It's sad. The city used to seem so much more vibrant.

Congratulations on both dating yourself and saying something totally dumb and untrue.

Someone's letting their recent transplant status show

Exactly the opposite. Several neighborhoods are a lot worse than 10-20 years ago. You just would not know because you haven’t been here long enough.

Cleveland Park on both Connecticut and Wisconsin are a shadow of what they once were. Friendship Heights used to be the Rodeo Drive of the city. Just to name a couple neighborhoods.

But you wouldn’t know because you were in middle school in some midwestern suburb then.

How is Cleveland Park a shadow on Wisconsin…there’s 10x more stuff happening there than 10 years ago with City Ridge and the Giant redevelopment.

CP on CT isn’t much changed other than normal business churn.

FH was killed by the Internet and Covid…but the new Mazza building and Trader Joe’s should help with reviving. It was never the Rodeo Drive of DC, just tried to be that on the MD side and then City Center (which is also doing well) stole its mojo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a few questions for the people who are determined to prove that families with kids can replace cars with bikes in DC if we just build more bike lanes and encourage biking.

- What do you do when your kids outgrow riding on your cargo bike but are still not really safe to ride a bike on their own behind you? I have a 7 yr old now who is already borderline for the back of a cargo bike. She can ride a bike on her own and I'm happy to take her own on certain trails and less-busy streets near our home during off peak hours. But I would not feel comfortable having her ride on her own bike in front of me during normal commuting hours to school -- there is too much traffic and drivers are so impatient that time of day and I don't think she has the awareness needed for that yet (it stresses me out sometimes and I'm and adult).

- What about the time and logistic crunch? My kid has an activity at 4:30pm one day a week. It requires some gear and that she change clothes from her school uniform and the venue doesn't have a place to change. Right now I pick her up from school on foot and then we walk home, she changes, and then I drive to the venue which takes about 15 minutes. On a bike it would take closer to 25 minutes. Even if I bike home from school cutting that commute in half over walking, I don't know how we'd get to the activity on time, plus I think the bike would be a little unwieldy with the equipment. And currently I often do grocery shopping while she's at the activity and then bring the groceries home in the car, but I don't see that being as feasible if we were on a cargo bike.

I like the idea of switching to a cargo bike in theory and if it were just me going to work, it would be a nobrainer (I currently take public transportation or walk to work though, so it wouldn't get a car off the road). But with a middle grade elementary kid it just doesn't make a ton of sense -- she's not a toddler who can easily pop on the back of a cargo bike and in a year or two that will be out of the question. And when I look at our schedule I ony see a few places where a bike would meaningfully compete with a car. For some things it's out of the question -- I can't take a cargo bike on a freeway to get her to her swim lessons or gymanstics camp. For other things like the weekday activity I just described it just seems inconvenient and inefficient.

I hear people raving about their cargo bikes around DC and especially other parents saying how it's replaced their car in so many ways and it makes life easier. The one thing I think would be nice on a cargo bike is grocery shopping (right now I either do it on foot and only get as much as I can carry or I take my car). But that's just once or twice a week, max. For everything else it makes more sense for us to walk (and let our kid scooter or bike if she wants but under our close supervision on foot) or drive.

I don’t have all the answers for you except to say that there are very few people claiming that you can/should NEVER drive. Just that we should make biking possible for many more trips.

In answer to some of your questions, obviously if we had better biking infrastructure you would feel safer letting your child bike on her own. In terms of logistics, you just invest in some gear (like panniers) to hold clothes etc. And often times biking is as fast or faster than driving, or you just build in an extra 15 mins. For example my bike commute downtown from the Hill is about only 5 minutes slower than driving and about 20 minutes faster than metro.

But if the goal is to make driving around DC harder than it is now, then yes people are arguing for people to replace cars with bikes/walking/transit, at least for local trips. But as someone who already does most of my travel on foot or via public transit, the idea of making the few things I now do by car harder just sounds like a burden and not one that can be easily addressed with a cargo bike (or any bike). And even if we found a way to do it with all the right accessories for the cargo bike (which are not cheap), we'd still have a car because we live in the US and it is not a country with the kind of transit infrastructure that makes it easy to travel places without a car. We can visit my inlaws without a car, for instance-- it is not actually possible to fly it take a train to where they live.

So when I look at it that way, I do not understand the fixation on bike lanes and bike infrastructure to reduce car congestion in DC. Making walking and public transit better and more accessible? Yes, no question. But I think there is a pretty firm ceiling on the percent of the population who will replace cars with bikes and I don't get why we cater so much of this conversation to that group of young, mostly child-free, bike enthusiasts. Realistically you are not going to convince older people, people with kids, people who have to have a car for other reasons, people with disabilities, etc., to ride bikes.

We'd be better off trying to convince people to take the bus.

Sigh. None of the plans are intended to randomly make it harder to drive for no reason other than liking bikes better. All of the controversial DDOT plans are intended primarily to calm traffic and many also include bus priority lanes. It’s a farce and a distortion to claim that the goal is to “make it harder to drive” just due to animus towards cars.

And of course the people fixated on hatinf bikes are also against many of the bus improvements (bus lanes, bus stop bump-outs, automated camera bus enforcement.)

OK. PP here.

Using bike lanes to calm traffic makes the experience if driving worse because it eliminates driving lanes and results in more congestion. I would be fine with these outcomes if they supported methods of transportation I think are more accessible and more likely to use-- public transit and walking. I support dedicated bus lanes and pedestrian infrastructure like wider, protected sidewalks, intersections that preference pedestrians over cars (particularly in dense neighborhoods where lots of pedestrians are inevitable and sort of the point, and in residential neighborhoods where we should be protecting kids and slowing traffic no matter what).

But as often DDOT defaults to bike lanes over these options. See, for example, the proposed bike lanes on South Dakota Avenue NE, and the recently installed bike lane in K Street NE. In both of these situations, it's not clear that bike lanes are the solution. There is not a lot demand for bike lanes on SD Ave and in fact they fave heavy opposition from people who live in the neighborhood. Yet the road absolutely needs traffic calming-- speeders are a major issue. I'd love to see dedicated bus lanes, wider sidewalks, and a permanent median one SD Ave. I don't see bike lanes as a good solution there. On K Street, the bike lane was pushed through by a small number if people in the neighborhood who bike. But there are already contraflow bike lanes on G and I street to serve this population. And the issue in K isn't speeding-- it gets congested during rush hour but isn't wide enough for speeding. The real issue is pedestrian safety at intersections where impatient drivers run stop signs, block cross walks, turn without yielding, etc. Better infrastructure ate intersections would be a huge help there but what really needs to happen is to incentive more people who commute via car through that corridor not to-- it's not built for it. Are these folks going to bike? No. But the might metro or take the bus if it was clean and efficient enough.

I think DDOT defaults to bike lanes a lot because they are cheap and the bike enthusiasts are loud. But us this good urban infrastructure? Often no. But it sure does result in a lot of communication conflict in our community, so that's good I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a few questions for the people who are determined to prove that families with kids can replace cars with bikes in DC if we just build more bike lanes and encourage biking.

- What do you do when your kids outgrow riding on your cargo bike but are still not really safe to ride a bike on their own behind you? I have a 7 yr old now who is already borderline for the back of a cargo bike. She can ride a bike on her own and I'm happy to take her own on certain trails and less-busy streets near our home during off peak hours. But I would not feel comfortable having her ride on her own bike in front of me during normal commuting hours to school -- there is too much traffic and drivers are so impatient that time of day and I don't think she has the awareness needed for that yet (it stresses me out sometimes and I'm and adult).

- What about the time and logistic crunch? My kid has an activity at 4:30pm one day a week. It requires some gear and that she change clothes from her school uniform and the venue doesn't have a place to change. Right now I pick her up from school on foot and then we walk home, she changes, and then I drive to the venue which takes about 15 minutes. On a bike it would take closer to 25 minutes. Even if I bike home from school cutting that commute in half over walking, I don't know how we'd get to the activity on time, plus I think the bike would be a little unwieldy with the equipment. And currently I often do grocery shopping while she's at the activity and then bring the groceries home in the car, but I don't see that being as feasible if we were on a cargo bike.

I like the idea of switching to a cargo bike in theory and if it were just me going to work, it would be a nobrainer (I currently take public transportation or walk to work though, so it wouldn't get a car off the road). But with a middle grade elementary kid it just doesn't make a ton of sense -- she's not a toddler who can easily pop on the back of a cargo bike and in a year or two that will be out of the question. And when I look at our schedule I ony see a few places where a bike would meaningfully compete with a car. For some things it's out of the question -- I can't take a cargo bike on a freeway to get her to her swim lessons or gymanstics camp. For other things like the weekday activity I just described it just seems inconvenient and inefficient.

I hear people raving about their cargo bikes around DC and especially other parents saying how it's replaced their car in so many ways and it makes life easier. The one thing I think would be nice on a cargo bike is grocery shopping (right now I either do it on foot and only get as much as I can carry or I take my car). But that's just once or twice a week, max. For everything else it makes more sense for us to walk (and let our kid scooter or bike if she wants but under our close supervision on foot) or drive.

I don’t have all the answers for you except to say that there are very few people claiming that you can/should NEVER drive. Just that we should make biking possible for many more trips.

In answer to some of your questions, obviously if we had better biking infrastructure you would feel safer letting your child bike on her own. In terms of logistics, you just invest in some gear (like panniers) to hold clothes etc. And often times biking is as fast or faster than driving, or you just build in an extra 15 mins. For example my bike commute downtown from the Hill is about only 5 minutes slower than driving and about 20 minutes faster than metro.

But if the goal is to make driving around DC harder than it is now, then yes people are arguing for people to replace cars with bikes/walking/transit, at least for local trips. But as someone who already does most of my travel on foot or via public transit, the idea of making the few things I now do by car harder just sounds like a burden and not one that can be easily addressed with a cargo bike (or any bike). And even if we found a way to do it with all the right accessories for the cargo bike (which are not cheap), we'd still have a car because we live in the US and it is not a country with the kind of transit infrastructure that makes it easy to travel places without a car. We can visit my inlaws without a car, for instance-- it is not actually possible to fly it take a train to where they live.

So when I look at it that way, I do not understand the fixation on bike lanes and bike infrastructure to reduce car congestion in DC. Making walking and public transit better and more accessible? Yes, no question. But I think there is a pretty firm ceiling on the percent of the population who will replace cars with bikes and I don't get why we cater so much of this conversation to that group of young, mostly child-free, bike enthusiasts. Realistically you are not going to convince older people, people with kids, people who have to have a car for other reasons, people with disabilities, etc., to ride bikes.

We'd be better off trying to convince people to take the bus.

Strongly agree. But changes to remove rush hour parking restrictions on a major transit artery and the addition of concrete islands elsewhere have greatly lengthened the transit time on buses I regularly take. The bike lanes are rarely being used. It’s nonsensical.

[Anonymous]

I mean arguing for every form of traffic calming except bike lanes is not really in good faith. The NIMBYs will be out in full force equally when it’s just adding a median and dedicated bus lane and not bike lanes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between the bus bump outs and the bikes lanes, Columbia Rd in AM has been destroyed for cars. It is absolutely awful, but I suppose that was their intention. It seems less safe for bikes now.

Seems sad what DDOT did there. All it does is permanently reduce the number of people who will go there.

DDOT: Helping Washingtonians rediscover Virginia and Maryland.

The economy is absolutely booming, and pretty much every neighborhood in DC is a pale shadow of what it was 10 years ago. So many empty storefronts, so few people on the streets. It's sad. The city used to seem so much more vibrant.

Congratulations on both dating yourself and saying something totally dumb and untrue.

Someone's letting their recent transplant status show

Exactly the opposite. Several neighborhoods are a lot worse than 10-20 years ago. You just would not know because you haven’t been here long enough.

Cleveland Park on both Connecticut and Wisconsin are a shadow of what they once were. Friendship Heights used to be the Rodeo Drive of the city. Just to name a couple neighborhoods.

But you wouldn’t know because you were in middle school in some midwestern suburb then.

How is Cleveland Park a shadow on Wisconsin…there’s 10x more stuff happening there than 10 years ago with City Ridge and the Giant redevelopment.

CP on CT isn’t much changed other than normal business churn.

FH was killed by the Internet and Covid…but the new Mazza building and Trader Joe’s should help with reviving. It was never the Rodeo Drive of DC, just tried to be that on the MD side and then City Center (which is also doing well) stole its mojo.

I think I understand the problem here. You’re unintelligent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is always the craziest time of year when a few haggard crazy bike moms post pictures of them hauling Christmas trees through traffic in a bike trailer.

“A few” = two people with an insatiable need for attention

It’s interesting that these thread almost always devolve into personal attacks and caricatures of bikers, but not the other way around. Almost as if this doesn’t actually have anything to do with a bona fide attempt to talk about modes of transit, public space, and the common good to y’all, but rather is an opportunity to create a target of insults and a reaction to any change at all.

Looks like someone hit a nerve. Are you “DC Trike Mom”?

What is this fetish of social media cyclists constant urge to post pictures of themselves with their bicycles?

It’s great they had all that time to waste documenting that they cycled to a store for random food items or other concocted errands.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between the bus bump outs and the bikes lanes, Columbia Rd in AM has been destroyed for cars. It is absolutely awful, but I suppose that was their intention. It seems less safe for bikes now.

Seems sad what DDOT did there. All it does is permanently reduce the number of people who will go there.

DDOT: Helping Washingtonians rediscover Virginia and Maryland.

The economy is absolutely booming, and pretty much every neighborhood in DC is a pale shadow of what it was 10 years ago. So many empty storefronts, so few people on the streets. It's sad. The city used to seem so much more vibrant.

Bring back Anthony Williams

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between the bus bump outs and the bikes lanes, Columbia Rd in AM has been destroyed for cars. It is absolutely awful, but I suppose that was their intention. It seems less safe for bikes now.

Seems sad what DDOT did there. All it does is permanently reduce the number of people who will go there.

DDOT: Helping Washingtonians rediscover Virginia and Maryland.

The economy is absolutely booming, and pretty much every neighborhood in DC is a pale shadow of what it was 10 years ago. So many empty storefronts, so few people on the streets. It's sad. The city used to seem so much more vibrant.

Bring back Anthony Williams

Unfortunately Tony Williams day has past. DC’s progressives would spend all of their time slandering him as racist somehow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have a few questions for the people who are determined to prove that families with kids can replace cars with bikes in DC if we just build more bike lanes and encourage biking.

- What do you do when your kids outgrow riding on your cargo bike but are still not really safe to ride a bike on their own behind you? I have a 7 yr old now who is already borderline for the back of a cargo bike. She can ride a bike on her own and I'm happy to take her own on certain trails and less-busy streets near our home during off peak hours. But I would not feel comfortable having her ride on her own bike in front of me during normal commuting hours to school -- there is too much traffic and drivers are so impatient that time of day and I don't think she has the awareness needed for that yet (it stresses me out sometimes and I'm and adult).

- What about the time and logistic crunch? My kid has an activity at 4:30pm one day a week. It requires some gear and that she change clothes from her school uniform and the venue doesn't have a place to change. Right now I pick her up from school on foot and then we walk home, she changes, and then I drive to the venue which takes about 15 minutes. On a bike it would take closer to 25 minutes. Even if I bike home from school cutting that commute in half over walking, I don't know how we'd get to the activity on time, plus I think the bike would be a little unwieldy with the equipment. And currently I often do grocery shopping while she's at the activity and then bring the groceries home in the car, but I don't see that being as feasible if we were on a cargo bike.

I like the idea of switching to a cargo bike in theory and if it were just me going to work, it would be a nobrainer (I currently take public transportation or walk to work though, so it wouldn't get a car off the road). But with a middle grade elementary kid it just doesn't make a ton of sense -- she's not a toddler who can easily pop on the back of a cargo bike and in a year or two that will be out of the question. And when I look at our schedule I ony see a few places where a bike would meaningfully compete with a car. For some things it's out of the question -- I can't take a cargo bike on a freeway to get her to her swim lessons or gymanstics camp. For other things like the weekday activity I just described it just seems inconvenient and inefficient.

I hear people raving about their cargo bikes around DC and especially other parents saying how it's replaced their car in so many ways and it makes life easier. The one thing I think would be nice on a cargo bike is grocery shopping (right now I either do it on foot and only get as much as I can carry or I take my car). But that's just once or twice a week, max. For everything else it makes more sense for us to walk (and let our kid scooter or bike if she wants but under our close supervision on foot) or drive.

I don’t have all the answers for you except to say that there are very few people claiming that you can/should NEVER drive. Just that we should make biking possible for many more trips.

In answer to some of your questions, obviously if we had better biking infrastructure you would feel safer letting your child bike on her own. In terms of logistics, you just invest in some gear (like panniers) to hold clothes etc. And often times biking is as fast or faster than driving, or you just build in an extra 15 mins. For example my bike commute downtown from the Hill is about only 5 minutes slower than driving and about 20 minutes faster than metro.

But if the goal is to make driving around DC harder than it is now, then yes people are arguing for people to replace cars with bikes/walking/transit, at least for local trips. But as someone who already does most of my travel on foot or via public transit, the idea of making the few things I now do by car harder just sounds like a burden and not one that can be easily addressed with a cargo bike (or any bike). And even if we found a way to do it with all the right accessories for the cargo bike (which are not cheap), we'd still have a car because we live in the US and it is not a country with the kind of transit infrastructure that makes it easy to travel places without a car. We can visit my inlaws without a car, for instance-- it is not actually possible to fly it take a train to where they live.

So when I look at it that way, I do not understand the fixation on bike lanes and bike infrastructure to reduce car congestion in DC. Making walking and public transit better and more accessible? Yes, no question. But I think there is a pretty firm ceiling on the percent of the population who will replace cars with bikes and I don't get why we cater so much of this conversation to that group of young, mostly child-free, bike enthusiasts. Realistically you are not going to convince older people, people with kids, people who have to have a car for other reasons, people with disabilities, etc., to ride bikes.

We'd be better off trying to convince people to take the bus.

They're not trying to convince anybody to do anything. They've given up on that and went straight to trying to force people.

Most of the bike mafia has made poor career/life choices and they’re intent is to make everyone around them as miserable as they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between the bus bump outs and the bikes lanes, Columbia Rd in AM has been destroyed for cars. It is absolutely awful, but I suppose that was their intention. It seems less safe for bikes now.

Seems sad what DDOT did there. All it does is permanently reduce the number of people who will go there.

DDOT: Helping Washingtonians rediscover Virginia and Maryland.

The economy is absolutely booming, and pretty much every neighborhood in DC is a pale shadow of what it was 10 years ago. So many empty storefronts, so few people on the streets. It's sad. The city used to seem so much more vibrant.

Congratulations on both dating yourself and saying something totally dumb and untrue.

Someone's letting their recent transplant status show

Exactly the opposite. Several neighborhoods are a lot worse than 10-20 years ago. You just would not know because you haven’t been here long enough.

Cleveland Park on both Connecticut and Wisconsin are a shadow of what they once were. Friendship Heights used to be the Rodeo Drive of the city. Just to name a couple neighborhoods.

But you wouldn’t know because you were in middle school in some midwestern suburb then.

And I can think of many neighborhoods in DC that are a lot better than they were 10-20 years ago and many of these have bike lanes, whereas those that you mention do not. What’s your point?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between the bus bump outs and the bikes lanes, Columbia Rd in AM has been destroyed for cars. It is absolutely awful, but I suppose that was their intention. It seems less safe for bikes now.

Seems sad what DDOT did there. All it does is permanently reduce the number of people who will go there.

DDOT: Helping Washingtonians rediscover Virginia and Maryland.

The economy is absolutely booming, and pretty much every neighborhood in DC is a pale shadow of what it was 10 years ago. So many empty storefronts, so few people on the streets. It's sad. The city used to seem so much more vibrant.

Congratulations on both dating yourself and saying something totally dumb and untrue.

Someone's letting their recent transplant status show

Exactly the opposite. Several neighborhoods are a lot worse than 10-20 years ago. You just would not know because you haven’t been here long enough.

Cleveland Park on both Connecticut and Wisconsin are a shadow of what they once were. Friendship Heights used to be the Rodeo Drive of the city. Just to name a couple neighborhoods.

But you wouldn’t know because you were in middle school in some midwestern suburb then.

You know what neighborhood is only increasing in vibrancy? Eastern Market/Capitol Hill/Union Market. Guess where in the city also has the best bike infrastructure and which neighborhood has refused.

It's flat there. It's closer to where people work. Younger people live there and many, many, many have or will move away from those places when they have kids. Those places have very little in common with the places where residents do not want or need bike lanes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is always the craziest time of year when a few haggard crazy bike moms post pictures of them hauling Christmas trees through traffic in a bike trailer.

“A few” = two people with an insatiable need for attention

It’s interesting that these thread almost always devolve into personal attacks and caricatures of bikers, but not the other way around. Almost as if this doesn’t actually have anything to do with a bona fide attempt to talk about modes of transit, public space, and the common good to y’all, but rather is an opportunity to create a target of insults and a reaction to any change at all.

Looks like someone hit a nerve. Are you “DC Trike Mom”?

What is this fetish of social media cyclists constant urge to post pictures of themselves with their bicycles?

It’s great they had all that time to waste documenting that they cycled to a store for random food items or other concocted errands.

I am not, but thanks for demonstrating yet again that this is driven by weird animus on your part

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between the bus bump outs and the bikes lanes, Columbia Rd in AM has been destroyed for cars. It is absolutely awful, but I suppose that was their intention. It seems less safe for bikes now.

Seems sad what DDOT did there. All it does is permanently reduce the number of people who will go there.

DDOT: Helping Washingtonians rediscover Virginia and Maryland.

The economy is absolutely booming, and pretty much every neighborhood in DC is a pale shadow of what it was 10 years ago. So many empty storefronts, so few people on the streets. It's sad. The city used to seem so much more vibrant.

Congratulations on both dating yourself and saying something totally dumb and untrue.

Someone's letting their recent transplant status show

Exactly the opposite. Several neighborhoods are a lot worse than 10-20 years ago. You just would not know because you haven’t been here long enough.

Cleveland Park on both Connecticut and Wisconsin are a shadow of what they once were. Friendship Heights used to be the Rodeo Drive of the city. Just to name a couple neighborhoods.

But you wouldn’t know because you were in middle school in some midwestern suburb then.

You know what neighborhood is only increasing in vibrancy? Eastern Market/Capitol Hill/Union Market. Guess where in the city also has the best bike infrastructure and which neighborhood has refused.

It's flat there. It's closer to where people work. Younger people live there and many, many, many have or will move away from those places when they have kids. Those places have very little in common with the places where residents do not want or need bike lanes.

People bike on the Hill because all the cars have been stolen or are about to be stolen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I thought the theory was that if we build it, they will come. The number of riders seems to be shrinking even as the number of lanes increases.

That was an obvious lie.

I think bicycle commuting has declined in every city since a peak around 2015 or so, except New York. But in New York I think a lot of people are choosing to bicycle because they are afraid of the subway.

There’s nothing scary about New York’s subway these days, but biking is cheaper and easier for people comfortable with biking.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Between the bus bump outs and the bikes lanes, Columbia Rd in AM has been destroyed for cars. It is absolutely awful, but I suppose that was their intention. It seems less safe for bikes now.

Seems sad what DDOT did there. All it does is permanently reduce the number of people who will go there.

DDOT: Helping Washingtonians rediscover Virginia and Maryland.

The economy is absolutely booming, and pretty much every neighborhood in DC is a pale shadow of what it was 10 years ago. So many empty storefronts, so few people on the streets. It's sad. The city used to seem so much more vibrant.

Congratulations on both dating yourself and saying something totally dumb and untrue.

Someone's letting their recent transplant status show

Exactly the opposite. Several neighborhoods are a lot worse than 10-20 years ago. You just would not know because you haven’t been here long enough.

Cleveland Park on both Connecticut and Wisconsin are a shadow of what they once were. Friendship Heights used to be the Rodeo Drive of the city. Just to name a couple neighborhoods.

But you wouldn’t know because you were in middle school in some midwestern suburb then.

How is Cleveland Park a shadow on Wisconsin…there’s 10x more stuff happening there than 10 years ago with City Ridge and the Giant redevelopment.

CP on CT isn’t much changed other than normal business churn.

FH was killed by the Internet and Covid…but the new Mazza building and Trader Joe’s should help with reviving. It was never the Rodeo Drive of DC, just tried to be that on the MD side and then City Center (which is also doing well) stole its mojo.

I think I understand the problem here. You’re unintelligent.

No…you were just schooled on what is actually happening and now you are deflecting because I showed what a dipshit you are.