Katie Britt Response

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So they really decided to go full in on the trad wife role for women huh?.

Project 2025? Charlie Kirk said he was sure Katie is a sweet mom and person. Funny to see women in a GOP that wants them to stay in the kitchen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m more than a little embarrassed for those of you weirdos calling her out for “cleavage.” Seriously?? A shirt buttoned to a normal depth is considered “cleavage” to you dimwits? Goodness, grab your smelling salts!

Her shirt was buttoned in the normal place. I don't understand why we have to sexually demean every woman.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m more than a little embarrassed for those of you weirdos calling her out for “cleavage.” Seriously?? A shirt buttoned to a normal depth is considered “cleavage” to you dimwits? Goodness, grab your smelling salts!

Her shirt was buttoned in the normal place. I don't understand why we have to sexually demean every woman.

Exactly. The only people idiotically clutching their pearls about her completely normal shirt are the usual misogynistic Democrats.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so much skin paired with a cross

Such a weird comment. What skin?

Not PP but that was more cleavage than politicians usually show when they’re at work. Also, I love the color of her blouse - Ann Taylor is full of that color right now.

Please post a picture of the cleavage. I watched it and saw zero cleavage.


cleav·age
noun
1.
the hollow between a woman's breasts when supported, especially as exposed by a low-cut garment.

It’s enough to make Jesus proud

yep, there's cleavage, ever so slightly
I wonder how long it took her to figure out how to clip the mike just so, so that it would nudge the shirt over just a bit and make that shadow (and hint of unbuttoning more buttons). She could have closed one more button, and I think the cross would have still been visible. Oh, but she wanted all the skin as cross background. Nothing sexier!

I do like the color. I'm fond of deep greens.

Do you consider these “sexy” too?

Crickets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a disaster, actually, I didn't listen to this last night but ending up listening to it today after all the uproar. She sounded like someone who is drunk + reading a bedtime story. WTF, is this nonsense? They have plenty of strong women is GOP, is this the best they could do?

P.S: I don't care about the kitchen setting or cleavage, those are non issues to me.

I'm told that the tone and cadence of her presentation was pretty typical for a white woman giving "testimony" in an evangelical setting. That's not my social crowd, so I couldn't say for sure.

More like a wannabe influencer video on social media.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so much skin paired with a cross

Such a weird comment. What skin?

Not PP but that was more cleavage than politicians usually show when they’re at work. Also, I love the color of her blouse - Ann Taylor is full of that color right now.

Please post a picture of the cleavage. I watched it and saw zero cleavage.


cleav·age
noun
1.
the hollow between a woman's breasts when supported, especially as exposed by a low-cut garment.

It’s enough to make Jesus proud

yep, there's cleavage, ever so slightly
I wonder how long it took her to figure out how to clip the mike just so, so that it would nudge the shirt over just a bit and make that shadow (and hint of unbuttoning more buttons). She could have closed one more button, and I think the cross would have still been visible. Oh, but she wanted all the skin as cross background. Nothing sexier!

I do like the color. I'm fond of deep greens.

Do you consider these “sexy” too?

Crickets.

Crickets because those don’t actually show any cleavage. Go back to the dictionary definition someone posted, those aren’t it.

[Anonymous]

Probably her place in DC that isn't used much.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so much skin paired with a cross

Such a weird comment. What skin?

Not PP but that was more cleavage than politicians usually show when they’re at work. Also, I love the color of her blouse - Ann Taylor is full of that color right now.

Please post a picture of the cleavage. I watched it and saw zero cleavage.


cleav·age
noun
1.
the hollow between a woman's breasts when supported, especially as exposed by a low-cut garment.

It’s enough to make Jesus proud

yep, there's cleavage, ever so slightly
I wonder how long it took her to figure out how to clip the mike just so, so that it would nudge the shirt over just a bit and make that shadow (and hint of unbuttoning more buttons). She could have closed one more button, and I think the cross would have still been visible. Oh, but she wanted all the skin as cross background. Nothing sexier!

I do like the color. I'm fond of deep greens.

Do you consider these “sexy” too?

Crickets.

Crickets because those don’t actually show any cleavage. Go back to the dictionary definition someone posted, those aren’t it.

Whooooooooosh… that’s the point, genius. Katie Britt showed as much “cleavage” as these pictures depict, that is, ZERO. Are you always this dense?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So they really decided to go full in on the trad wife role for women huh?.

Considering she’s a United States Senator, not really. But nice try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was all so incredibly staged, from the kitchen to the prominent cross to the put upon near-tears.

I really wish these so-called “trad wives” would just go back to the kitchen and shut up already. I find the whole “women’s highest place is in the home, but not for me, I’m a Senator” thing to be really off putting. We get it, you’re #notlikeothergirls, Katie. Most other girls wouldn’t use their position of power to oppress their sisters.

She is a Hill veteran before moving back to Alabama to run for office. She is hardly a "trad wife" - it is all performative.

Exactly. She’s a hustler and she works outside the home and always has. She’s decided the “trad wife” lifestyle is a waste for her and wants power. No shame in it - I’ve decided my best and highest calling is outside the home, too. My kids would agree.

The shame is the fact that she can’t own what she is. It’s all so…whorish.

Of that, I am certain. And your “whorish” remark? Thanks for exemplifying the typical misogynistic Democrat.

[Anonymous]

Who cares about the cleavage. The point isn't that she was showing cleavage. It's that she was intentionally doing so as part of the whole strange caricature she was presenting. It's just one small obviously contrived aspect of an obviously contrived presentation that screamed inauthenticity.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so much skin paired with a cross

Such a weird comment. What skin?

Not PP but that was more cleavage than politicians usually show when they’re at work. Also, I love the color of her blouse - Ann Taylor is full of that color right now.

Please post a picture of the cleavage. I watched it and saw zero cleavage.


cleav·age
noun
1.
the hollow between a woman's breasts when supported, especially as exposed by a low-cut garment.

So provocative.

Right? Lots of pathetic sexually frustrated LWNJs claiming this was in any way revealing. So sad and yet painfully amusing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares about the cleavage. The point isn't that she was showing cleavage. It's that she was intentionally doing so as part of the whole strange caricature she was presenting. It's just one small obviously contrived aspect of an obviously contrived presentation that screamed inauthenticity.

I’m truly embarrassed for you that you consider a normal neckline to be showing “cleavage” of any kind. You don’t get out much, do you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares about the cleavage. The point isn't that she was showing cleavage. It's that she was intentionally doing so as part of the whole strange caricature she was presenting. It's just one small obviously contrived aspect of an obviously contrived presentation that screamed inauthenticity.

I’m truly embarrassed for you that you consider a normal neckline to be showing “cleavage” of any kind. You don’t get out much, do you?

don't try and change the subject. I don't care whether or not she shows cleavage.

I do find it hilarious that she thought she needed to show cleavage, and a perfectly positioned cross, to portray the weird soap opera character she was playing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who cares about the cleavage. The point isn't that she was showing cleavage. It's that she was intentionally doing so as part of the whole strange caricature she was presenting. It's just one small obviously contrived aspect of an obviously contrived presentation that screamed inauthenticity.

+1 The cleavage isn’t too weird, alone. The kitchen isn’t either. The panting line delivery is weird, but it’s the altogether that is bizarre.